First homes kick-start

Last updated 05:00 20/04/2009

Relevant offers

Politics

MPs' travel bills leap during election Remedial work for navy's problem ship Wait for new oil law before awarding permits, Govt urged TVNZ included in police Electoral Act investigation Sea law 'an environmental risk' Govt defends 50c an hour minimum wage lift Maori queue-jumping for SOEs raised More claims about PM's man and doco funding Peters demands apology over Whanau Ora row Today in politics: Friday, February 10

Interest-free loans for first-home buyers are among a second wave of job-creation measures being worked on by the Government as its job summit gets mixed reviews nearly two months on.

Documents made public under the Official Information Act show interest-free first-home-buyer loans of up to $10,000 were among proposals put up and worked on by private-sector chairs and senior Government officials in the lead-up to the jobs summit.

Others included a housing upgrade plan to fix leaky buildings, interest-free loans for home owners to improve heating and water efficiency; incentives for early retirement and paying employers a subsidy to hold on to apprentices.

Many did not make it into the jobs summit "top 20" thrashed out after a brainstorming session on February 27 involving public service and private sector bosses and Government ministers.

But many continue to be worked on by ministers, including loans to people to build their first home or renovate their existing one.

Registered Master Builders chief executive Warwick Quinn said the proposals to steer more first-home buyers into building their own home were among those sent off for more work.

Work was also being done on a proposal to cut delays around leaky building disputes so builders could "just get on and fix the problem".

"We know there is an appetite within the [Government] to look at leaky homes ... and we know they are looking also at trying to encourage people into their first homes ... so yes, I think they're serious about it," Mr Quinn said.

Building and Construction Minister Maurice Williamson has confirmed the Government is looking at "an alternative approach" to leaky buildings, with more emphasis on "getting homes fixed".

Cabinet ministers are due to get an update on job-summit progress today but as job losses accelerate, the Government faces criticism that it is not doing enough.

But Mr Quinn was positive about the outcome of the summit.

The extra work arising out of the summit bringing forward $216 million in school building projects and $124 million refurbishing state houses would make a difference "particularly to the `smaller builder, with the dog, the ute and apprentice'. But whether it makes enough of a difference we have to wait and see."

In recent weeks there had been more inquiries to builders about work, though those inquiries were slow to convert into jobs.

Unemployment hit 4.6 per cent last month and is expected to have passed 5 per cent when the next figures are issued next month.

Council of Trade Unions economist Peter Conway said the summit's success so far in creating jobs had been "pretty modest to say the least, when you consider all the pressures they're putting on the public service and laying people off.

Ad Feedback

"Not a big tick there."

Several hundred jobs have so far been earmarked to go in the public service and more will follow.

In the private sector, the flagship policy to come out of the summit the nine-day fortnight has had limited take-up. Just two companies have signed up, saving 160 jobs. Mr Conway said he was aware of a third, while about 50 companies have begun the process.

That earned the Government "a small tick". But there had also been talk at the summit about more support for redundant workers "we're still waiting to see some of those initiatives roll out".

Overall, the Government did not appear to be acting with enough urgency.

"We're still positive about the initiatives [the Government] has looked at but we'd have to say it's not tracking nearly as strongly as we think is required given the forecasts for rapidly rising unemployment Treasury is working on."

But NZ Exchange chief executive Mark Weldon, handpicked by Prime Minister John Key to chair the summit, said there was intense work behind the scenes.

"It's pretty extraordinary. Everyone wants everything done and announced yesterday. We've got to trust [the Government] a bit on this one."

- By TRACY WATKINS, Dominion Post

3 comments
Post a comment
james   #3   07:32 pm May 01 2009

Corey sounds like a great idea.

My partner and I want to get into our first home, but there is no way at present conditions that we would be extended a loan - yet we are in a stable financial condition and should remain so bar a complete economic meltdown, in which case there would be bigger fish to fry.

Murray   #2   01:36 pm Apr 20 2009

There is not a great deal of difference between the psyche of the average New Zealander and that of our Australian cousins. There is a huge difference in the way the governments of Australian PM Kevin Rudd and PM John Key are confronting the global economic crisis, and yet both prime ministers have very high approval ratings.

Although there are some deeper issues (eg, the respective fiscal debt:GDP ratios; the perceived commodity-based ability for recovery; sovereign control of corporate assets), to a degree, one government's approach must be right and the other must be wrong.

Perhaps the respective popularity of our prime ministers is presently not gauged on any analytical basis, but more so on some "feel good" factor. In which case, PM Key's optimism, particularly his presently stated belief that the economy will turn by the end of the year and be in "aggressive recovery" early next year and that tax cut programmes are affordable, would much help with the "feel good".

PM John Key lauds that NZers will survive the recession well because we are "flexible". We must give him the benefit of the doubt and believe that he considers himself to be one of the most "flexible", and therefore, if he felt the prognosis had changed then he would be first to speak up and suggest a different direction.

For a month or more now, Finance Minister Bill English has been saying, "Wait until the Budget", but then he is not one who advocates "flexibility".

I do not know what the fuss is all about and the quest for suitable stimulatory infrastructural projects? Housing construction is the answer.

New Zealand has a large expatriate population and a trend of relatively high long-term departures. It is probably a reversal of these demographics that is retarding a predicted higher fall in house prices and an increase in rents. Our building industry has been in the doldrums for far too long which affects the domiciled skills base and the underpinning of a big sector of the economy. All the indicators are that we do not have an excessive housing stock.

The opportunity cost of keeping an ageing population in their family home has not been weighted against the direct savings in residential care costs and consequently there is a poor use of our housing stock. There is a need for the construction of more compact, modern insulated, selectively located housing for the elderly in order to better use suburban, family housing.

Home ownership "privatises" tenancy problems and should be encouraged to the maximum.

All this requires "flexibility" - "flexible" and collaborative thinking between central and local government. Instead, they are worried about how they are able to divest themselves of each other (eg Auckland super city).

The answer is right under their noses, but either it is not glamorous enough, they cannot see the wood for the trees, or, they are not sufficiently "flexible".

corey s   #1   11:42 am Apr 20 2009

I think the reinstatement of a suspensory loans system to low income first home buyers is an excellent idea, and one i have no problem paying taxes to support. Nearly 20 years ago my partner and i had little to no money. We were able to secure a suspensory loan thru Housing NZ; this aided us with the deposit required to purchase a state house from the government. This loan was written of at the rate of 14% per year (eg no debt after 7 years). We were able to do renovations over a 3 year period.(pumping money inot the economy) We sold our house, made a small profit and paid back 42% of the suspensory loan. This gave us our kick start, I will always be thankful to the NZ society i live in that helped out a young family those many years ago

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Do you think politicians spend too much on travel?

Yes - they should be reined in

No - travelling is part of their jobs

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Pagani blog pointer small

John Pagani - Left leaning

Don't set Treaty back 25 years

David Farrar blog pointer small

By the Numbers: David Farrar watches the polls

Mondayising Waitangi and Anzac Days

The Whip blog pointer small

Andrea Vance and John Hartevelt on politics

What to do with the Crafar Farms?