Ad Feedback

Families appointment: Rankin 'surprised' by reaction

By TRACY WATKINS and KERI WELHAM - The Dominion Post
Last updated 16:16 12/05/2009
NEW APPOINTMENT: Christine Rankin says she is "really surprised" by the reaction to her controversial appointment as a Families Commissioner.
ANDREW GORRIE / The Dominion Post
APPOINTED: Christine Rankin at Parliament in 2007 protesting over the Medicines Bill.

Related Links

Is Rankin worth the risk? Blog: Rankin's unlikely job Commission anti-smacking: head

Relevant offers

Politics

Sharples' stepson to be ordained in marae first Buy your furniture or we'll sell it, Crown tells ministers Harawira may not be forced out of party Consultants 'scandalous waste of money' Complaints about Harawira flood in 'Sticking points' stall ETS Parents know better than you, Children's Commissioner told Auckland Supercity structure unveiled Copenhagen negotiations on track - Groser National makes progress on ETS bill support

Christine Rankin says she is "really surprised" by the reaction to her controversial appointment as a Families Commissioner.

UnitedFuture leader Peter Dunne, architect of the Families Commission, today lambasted the appointment as "a mistake" and called on Ms Rankin to reject the position.

Labour leader Phil Goff said she was a controversial and divisive figure. 

Green MP Sue Bradford said National was subverting the commission through political appointments, and accused it of sabotage.

Ms Rankin, who recently remarried for the fourth time, said today she had not expected the furore over her appointment.

"I am really surprised by the level of reaction," said Ms Rankin.

Ms Rankin said she had not been appointed to agree with everyone.

"I have a particular view and a passion for New Zealand children and families and I think I have a big contribution to make."

She said the MPs were entitled to their opinions. Her view was the sabotage allegation was "nonsensical" and Labour criticism meant nothing to her.

"(Labour) set out to destroy me a long time ago and I don't know that any of that's changed."

Ms Rankin said she stood by her criticism of the anti-smacking bill. She said parents were unnecessarily investigated and it created fear in the community.

"To me it was silly legislation in the first place; we've got a major child abuse problem. We don't need a smokescreen that takes us down the wrong road."

She did not regret her previous comments - she said Labour made mileage out of one conference while she had made major savings at the department, Miss Clark did not have children and Maori did need to face child abuse issues.

"We need to stop being politically correct."

The Government confirmed today Ms Rankin was one of two new appointees to the commission in a decision which has already sparked controversy.

The Families Commission was set up as a Crown agency to promote better understanding of families issues as part of a support deal between United Future and Labour following the 2002 election.

National was previously scathing of it but agreed to retain it as part of its post-election support agreement with Mr Dunne.

"Ms Rankin is simply the wrong person to be appointed to a body of this type. She is divisive and controversial and her appointment will be disruptive to the ongoing work of the commission," Mr Dunne said.

Ad Feedback

"The fact that her appointment was bitterly contested within the Cabinet, together with her fall from grace under the previous government, shows she does not enjoy sufficiently widespread political support to make her appointment tenable."

Ms Rankin should decline the appointment, he said.

"Her taking up this role will seriously undermine the credibility of the Families Commission."

Social Development Minister Paula Bennett announced the appointment of former head of Winz (now Work and Income) Ms Rankin, and Bruce Pilbrow, chief executive of the advice service Parents Inc, saying they were strong advocates for children and families. There are seven commissioners.

Prime Minister John Key said Ms Rankin was passionate in campaigning against child abuse.

It was reported Cabinet hotly debated Ms Rankin's appointment.

Goff said he was astounded and said Ms Rankin's personal friends prevailed in the Cabinet debate.

"She is obviously a very controversial and divisive figure," he told reporters.

"The last time we had a recession she was spending several hundred thousand on hiring a private plane and a luxury lodge for her chief executives.

"Is that the sort of message we want to send out?"

Ms Rankin was not reappointed as Winz chief executive after staging the spectacular conference with a price tag of $235,000. She then lost a colourful legal challenge to her dismissal in 2001.

Ms Rankin led a group opposed to Ms Bradford's anti-smacking legislation - which National voted for. As head of For The Sake Of Our Children Trust she went head to head with former Children's Commissioner Cindy Kiro and child advocate groups.

Ms Rankin argued the law change, removing the defence of reasonable force when parent was charged was charged with assaulting a child, would make thousands of parents criminals.

"She's attacked groups like Barnados and others that she will now be required to work with," Mr Goff said.

During the anti-smacking debate Ms Rankin referred to former Prime Minister Helen Clark as childless, which Mr Goff said was an unacceptable personal attack.

Ms Bradford said the Families Commission supported her bill.

"Ms Rankin's appointment seems like a deliberate move that will divide the commission. This amounts to a form of political sabotage," Ms Bradford said.

The law was working well and police were happy with it, she said.

"I'm extremely concerned about the influence Ms Rankin's view may have on the future of the commission's work on violence against children, and the future of the commission itself."

Mr Goff said Ms Rankin aligned herself so exclusively with one side of the political spectrum, for example attending Destiny Church and Families First rallies, that it was hard to see how she could be representative.

Mr Key said despite her record he considered Ms Rankin a safe pair of hands whose priority would be families.

"I don't think she will actually agree with the National Party on certain issues, we've taken a different response for instance with smacking - she has been a strong proponent the other way."

Ms Bennett said she had argued for the appointment.

"I think we were pretty strong in putting her forward, and she certainly presented well," she told reporters.

"I think Christine has some pretty strong views on things, I think she will bring those views to the commission and as a consequence the decisions that come out of it will be fairly robust."

Lobby group Family First NZ welcomed the appointments.

"Both Christine and Bruce will bring the Commission 'down to earth' and rather than being blinded by ideology, it will hopefully start listening to the voice of families and advocating for them in a relevant way," said Bob McCoskrie, national director of Family First.

- with NZPA

109 comments
Post a comment
lydia   #109   10:53 pm Jun 22 2009

i would like to get in contact with Christine how can i do this?

liz forster   #108   04:39 pm Jun 01 2009

Go Christine, who are all these so called amazing people out there who are so PERFECT!! Don,t see them applying for the job. Get a life & be thankful that there are the likes of Christine out there who would not need this job if you were all the perfect parents that you seem to think you are.

Lady Dedlok   #107   09:05 am May 19 2009

Just because someone is child-free, does not mean they have no understanding of parenting or are not entitled to an opinion about it. I haven't been to the moon, but I know it isn't made of green cheese. Did you know that 'Super Nanny', the British reality show star who has created a multi-million doallar empire out of telling others how to parent, is also child-free? Guess she must know something about the subject, after all. I think the real issue here is: who on earth are these men who keep lining up to be with someone like Madame Rankin???

Helen   #106   01:02 pm May 18 2009

I think Christine Rankin is a good choice for the Families Commission. She is a strong woman with a lot of life experience, capable of identifying and verbalising problems in the NZ society. The media and people like Peter Dunne should back off and let her get on with the job Ms Rankin has been appointed to. Dunne's reported suggestion (RadioNZ this morning) that she would not be good at the job inappropriately presupposes her performance and confirms Dunne as a bigot.

Lesly Hunt   #105   08:30 pm May 17 2009

Congratulations Christine one your reply to the interview on Sunday 17th. It is time we had some one in a high profile position who is articulate and able to take the gutter journalists on up front. You go for it as I personally belive that you are the right person for this position. Up front to protect "OUR CHILDREN". I just wish that I was able to voice my concerns like you can. Congratulations on your appointment as Family Commissioner. You have my whole hearted support. Regards Lesly Hunt Blenheim NZ

Fruit Trees   #104   03:44 pm May 14 2009

How idiotic is it to expect that the no smacking bill will produce results instantaneously! It will take generations for benefits to be seen. Sure the odd smack won't 100% produce a murderer but why smack when there are alternatives? Banning smacking will encourage people to look for other options in which coaching should be more readily available. I just hope that the bill sticks around long enough for the results to be seen because a new government whether it be left or right loves to behave like a dog and spread it's scent everywhere.

Fruit Tree   #103   03:25 pm May 14 2009

'actively promote the destruction of family values through policies such as the anti smacking law and adoption of children by homosexual couples'

Narrow?

Steven   #102   11:49 am May 14 2009

I'm struck by the hypocrisy of people/media/Labour complaining about Christine mentioning the fact that Helen Clarke is childless (which is mildly relevant when shes telling me how to raise my children) and in the same breath going on about the fact that she has been married 4 times. It seems that personal attacks are fine so long as they are not against you.

Murray   #101   11:28 am May 14 2009

I wish Police Dept were able to fully investigate all reports they get for theft, supporter(#99).

I feel if they had the resources to do this then the amount of petty theft would reduce.

There would be a flow-on effect to stop more serious burglary.

The law would then not be idiotic.

supporter   #100   11:47 pm May 13 2009

My partner is a social worker they have to investigate all reports they get for smacking.

The law is idiotic and does nothing to stop serious abuse


Show 50-99 of 109 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you sign in, you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Ad Feedback
Special offers

Featured Promotions