NZ First criticises migrant screening
Relevant offers
Politics
An increasing number of refugees are having their status cancelled, prompting concerns about Immigration New Zealand's screening methods.
Figures show that 23 refugees have had their status cancelled by the Refugee Status Branch in 2006 an increase of 13 from the previous year.
Since 2002, 49 refugees have had their status cancelled.
Refugee status can be terminated only if it has been obtained by fraud or if a serious crime had been committed by the refugee before gaining status.
New Zealand First associate immigration spokesman Peter Brown said Immigration New Zealand had to improve its processes to ensure "bogus refugees are not being let into New Zealand in the first place".
"The fact that so many refugees have had their status revoked in the last few years indicates to me that our Immigration Service is unable to prevent fraudsters and those who have committed serious crimes from entering our country," he said.
"Only genuine refugees should be allowed into New Zealand, and it is essential that Immigration improves its screening processes to ensure all fraudulent and bogus refugee claimants are weeded out before being granted refugee status."
The figures relate to asylum claimants or those who have arrived at New Zealand's borders and claimed its protection for fear of returning to their home country. An asylum claimant is different to the quota of 750 refugees that New Zealand lets in each year.
Department of Labour acting refugee division director Pamela Anderson defended the screening process.
"Screening an asylum claim consists of a thorough interview process, reference to country-specific information and careful verification of the claimant's identity," she said.
Anderson said the process could take up to two months.
"A person's refugee status can then be cancelled when the department receives robust evidence the person obtained refugee status through fraud," she said.
Brown said it was cases like Algerian refugee Ahmed Zaoui that proved the system was largely inefficient.
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
Debate heats up on national rates rebate
Hospital heads dismiss DHB merger fears
Supermarket, shops shut in quake scare
Dotcom accused van der Kolk 'flabbergasted'
On yer bike to see the movies in Christchurch
Ethnic rights advice stuns communities
Prison officers 'turned into mules'
Rugby joy short-lived, nation pessimistic
Prime Minister John Key wins hearts if not minds
'Trail blazer' Carmen farewelled in Auckland
Man missing after Harbour Bridge fall
Prison officers 'turned into mules'
Ethnic rights advice stuns communities
Rugby joy short-lived, nation pessimistic
Dotcom accused van der Kolk 'flabbergasted'
Roll on 2050 - New Zealand economy to rise
England fight back to edge Italy in Six Nations
Suarez a 'disgrace to Liverpool' in loss to United
Police arrest five at Murdoch's Sun newspaper
Oceania, Fifa roles end in disgrace as facts emerge
Cameron-Barrett to headline Heavyweight Explosion
Gardener's paradise planned for Chch
Danny Lee drops back to pack at Pebble Beach
Obama tries to defuse birth control fight
Ethnic rights advice stuns communities
Roll on 2050 - New Zealand economy to rise
Dotcom accused van der Kolk 'flabbergasted'
Prison officers 'turned into mules'
Rugby joy short-lived, nation pessimistic
Tension high as lethal log pile cleared
Police name Hawke's Bay crash victim
Helmet law halves cyclist numbers
Old trains more reliable than new Matangi
Bus changes raise fears in suburbs
Deep south beats rest of nation in jobless
Farmer faces wait over 'useless' land
Manawatu Gorge progress pleases
Governor General's concert draws thousands
Do you think politicians spend too much on travel?


