Axe DPB to discourage pregnancy - report

Last updated 05:00 21/07/2009

Relevant offers

Politics

Shake-up heading in EQC's direction Brownlee turns up heat on council over rebuild Agency mulled to run emergency 111 system MPs' travel bills leap during election Remedial work for navy's problem ship Wait for new oil law before awarding permits, Govt urged TVNZ included in police Electoral Act investigation Sea law 'an environmental risk' Govt defends 50c an hour minimum wage lift Maori queue-jumping for SOEs raised

The domestic purposes benefit should be axed to discourage young women from getting pregnant, a Business Roundtable paper on Maori and welfare argues.

Other radical options discussed by its author, Wellington welfare commentator Lindsay Mitchell, include replacing state-funded unemployment benefits with private insurance, replacing some benefits with loans, and regionalising and privatising Work and Income.

Under a privatised system, competing operators could be given incentives to reduce the number of beneficiaries, she suggests.

Prime Minister John Key had not read the report yesterday but said it sounded "pretty draconian".

Social Development and Employment Minister Paula Bennett said none of the ideas were on the agenda for the Government.

The report is the fifth working paper on Maori from the Business Roundtable, which represents the interests of large businesses and whose membership is dominated by the chief executives of major firms.

Previous papers have looked at the Maori seats in Parliament and Maori economic development.

Mrs Mitchell said yesterday the welfare system had "hurt Maori more than other New Zealanders, and will continue to do so".

"In particular, the practice of paying for single parenting, substituting the state for whanau, has perverse effects on people who will continue to feature heavily in statistics that describe the worst aspects of life today."

Her report links a Maori marriage rate "much lower" than the general population to higher reported rates of child abuse. It also points to teenage birth rates among Maori being higher than Pakeha.

She says the priority for Maori should be stopping the flow of young people into the welfare system. "Crucial to solving dependence and all the attendant problems is preventing more young girls from entering the system that traps them.

"That means discouraging them from getting pregnant in the first place. To that end, the DPB should be abolished."

She describes DPB recipients as "a job-creation opportunity going begging", saying about 50,000 have only one child, while New Zealand has a "serious shortage" of private childcare.

But Susan St John, a Child Poverty Action Group spokeswoman, said the ideas were radical and punitive.

Educating young women about family planning and giving them increased opportunities to train were more helpful.

BENEFIT BREAKDOWN

43,258 Maori were receiving the domestic purposes benefit at the end of June 41 per cent of all recipients.

In total, 97,814 Maori were receiving one of the main benefits 32 per cent of all working-age benefit recipients.

Ad Feedback

Of 104,400 people on the DPB, nearly 90 per cent were female.

49,557 of all DPB recipients had one child. About 40 per cent of one-child parents receiving the DPB were Maori.

SOURCE: Social Development Ministry, figures to the end of June 2009.

- REBECCA PALMER/Dominion Post

26 comments
Post a comment
Sarah   #26   09:10 pm Sep 16 2010

I had absolutely no idea that DPB was available when I got pregnant at just 20 years old. So I worked my butt off doing around 60 hours per week to save money until I could work again but eventually had to resort to it when my son was 2 months old, and after discovering that there was help. I never deliberately had a child to go on the DPB and this is the most ridiculous thing in the paper today!

tina   #25   01:18 pm May 28 2010

Hi there i agree with the comment below, getting rid of the DPB is not going to eliminate any of the issues. All it will do is place families in a worse of situation than before there will be families living on the streets, more overcrowded homes and less educated children for the next generation to come, and is it not a mothers right or obligation to the development of that child to stay home at least for the first three years to give that child all the bennifits of life??? My suggestion is more education in the schools, maybe a young mum course takes solo teenage mothers into the schools to educate young woman things like that will be more bennifical to our people rather than oppressing them more like the Treaty it will just create more seperation and oppression to the people of NZ and it will have an effect that will carry through generations i think this Western society needs to re think some of their stratigies i mean come on could the dominate ellite raise their families with no finacial suppot, and this will also have a huge effect on solo mums trying to study and create a life for their children. It will no longer be possible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

teresa   #24   10:13 am Jan 19 2010

axing the dpb will not prevent pregnancy, fathers doing a disappearing act, or marriages breaking up. it is the mothers and children that will be disadvantaged and not the fathers who in certain situations will take the easy road and disappear rather than take responsibility. also what about marriages breaking up? where does that leave the mothers and children of broken marriages? there are other situations that need to be taken into account such as abuse, prison, etc. there are always situations that are out of our control, especially pregnancy. this could easily become a human rights issue. i think this report was not thoroughly researched.

Angela Church   #23   05:59 am Dec 03 2009

NZ society still has a long way to go to properly accommodate working mothers. Yes, it is the responsibility of individuals to provide for themselves, their families and their dependents, while also recognizing that government must respond to those who require assistance and compassion.

Albatross   #22   07:43 pm Aug 10 2009

The interests of large businesses and chief executives may be willing to let single parents and children live in hard poverty. But I'm not. Education, not welfare cutting.

Michael   #21   10:31 pm Jul 21 2009

This is absolutely ridiculous. Whether people like it or not, a chunk of our tax dollars are always going to go towards helping other people. Welcome to a modern, civilised society. Get over it!

It's a disgusting simplification to suggest Maori women can be deterred from having children by taking away the DPB. That's almost as bad as claiming prison acts as a deterrent for crime.

Do people honestly believe it's a case of "oh, damn, we're behind on the rent. Honey, we need to have another kid to cover next month's bills"?

Instead of suggesting excuses to get out of paying welfare to various groups of people, why don't we hear some suggestions for getting those groups of people out of poverty, so they don't have to rely on welfare in the first place? Hey, we could sort out some of our crime problems at the same time!

Tim   #20   08:45 pm Jul 21 2009

A nations greatness is measured by the individual achievment of its people as a whole.

Nightwing   #19   07:01 pm Jul 21 2009

I'm a middle income earner living a very very middle income lifestyle and I pay my dues to society in the form of a waking great tax bill along with a lot of other middle income NZers. I don't begrudge paying for the elderly and the retired; they have done their bit for this country, but there are too many freeloaders out there and we make it too easy for them. And yes, once again Maori are doing there bit top the statistics. If you find it embarrassing then do something about it but don't keep holding your hand out and asking for more .........

Ross   #18   06:51 pm Jul 21 2009

Every one has a choice. Some choose different than others. I'm 6th of 8 kids, born to lower socioeconomic, abusive and alcoholic et al... parents. I chose a different path than they chose. We all have a choice irrelevant of where we "come from". We do have a choice as to where and how we progress. I do not buy into racial, situational or generational victimisation and poverty. We all have a choice to change.

moki   #17   03:14 pm Jul 21 2009

To Steve

Just remember on whose Confiscated lands this country has become wealthy on. Its easy to talk about all the opportunities that Māori get but look around you, if you are Pākeha you live in your system which by default is a privilage you take for granted. Māori and others have to adapt in a world of white privilage, eg In politics Māori have no choice but to take what is dished out to them eg the Seabed and Foreshore law and numerous council bylaws. Māori have 2 tv channels that they fought tooth and nail for, non Māori have the rest of them. The same goes for other forms of media. The print media are in the whole owned and controlled by non Māori. To say that Māori woman go on the DPB out of concious choice is wrong in my view, lets face it! try bringing up a family on your own with the amount of money paid from the DPB and you will soon see how hard it is. I know I will probably get a few nasty letters for this but thats fine. I agree with Ghandi we need to look after those most vulnerable in our society not send them out on the streets with nothing.

Moki


Show 1-16 of 26 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Do you think politicians spend too much on travel?

Yes - they should be reined in

No - travelling is part of their jobs

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Pagani blog pointer small

John Pagani - Left leaning

Don't set Treaty back 25 years

David Farrar blog pointer small

By the Numbers: David Farrar watches the polls

Mondayising Waitangi and Anzac Days

The Whip blog pointer small

Andrea Vance and John Hartevelt on politics

What to do with the Crafar Farms?