Bennett: debate got 'ugly'

Last updated 14:22 29/07/2009

Govt accused of silencing critics

Paula Bennett: I didn't go too far

Paula Bennett
PHIL REID/Dominion Post
PAULA BENNETT: 'It has been an absolutely horrific debate'.

Related Links

Paula Bennett accused of Muldoon-style bullying Blog: Shame on you, Paula

Relevant offers

Politics

Shake-up heading in EQC's direction Will bill make food safer or be a form of control? Brownlee turns up heat on council over rebuild Agency mulled to run emergency 111 system MPs' travel bills leap during election Remedial work for navy's problem ship Wait for new oil law before awarding permits, Govt urged TVNZ included in police Electoral Act investigation Sea law 'an environmental risk' Govt defends 50c an hour minimum wage lift

Social Development Minister Paula Bennett has spoken to one of the solo mums at the centre of a row over training allowances says she regrets the ugly turn that public debate has taken.

The pair had agreed to coffee the next time Ms Bennett was in Invercargill.

Ms Bennett said she did not regret releasing the information but did not condone the abuse that had been directed at the women.

"The only regret I have is that in some quarters it's been an absolutely horrific debate which has been very personalised and ugly and I don't support that at all," Ms Bennett said.

A row has broken out over Ms Bennett's release of income details of two women who questioned the impact of government policy on their ability to continue their studies.

Natasha Fuller and Jennifer Johnston say cutting the training incentive allowance jeopardised both their chances of getting off the DPB and back into work.

But since the release of their personal details by Ms Bennett they have been vilified on talk back radio and elsewhere.

Ms Bennett said she did not regret releasing the women's details and it was done so "in the nature of having a full debate".

She revealed that Ms Fuller was receiving $715 a week and Ms Johnston $554. Both have three children.

Labour has laid a complaint with the privacy commissioner.

Ms Bennett confirmed that she had phoned Ms Johnston today and they had "a long discussion".

"She put her view point forward on how hard it would be for her to study next year.....and that she would like to be able to borrow more money so she could do that.

"She's not angry with me. She felt the information [on her income] was readily available and she didn't feel that it was a privacy issue. She's invited me round for coffee next time I'm in Invercargill and I said I'd take the coffee."

Meanwhile in Parliament, Labour MP Lianne Dalziel made a personal statement denying any political motivation behind the women coming forward.

 

-By TRACY WATKINS, Dominion Post

Ad Feedback
230 comments
Louisette   #230   01:39 pm Jul 29 2009

I tend to agree with taxpayer #204 here in some ways. Bad things do happen to good people. We lose jobs, we get pregnant by accident. These things happen to us and it's not our fault, but it's a fact that some women do abuse the system. Earlier, my friend and I were tossing around the idea that contraception should be a requirement for women on the DPB. I like this idea. I don't mean sterilisation, I mean that we don't want women to have babies that they can't care for, and that taxpayers shouldn't have to pay for these women's offspring. DPB recipients would have to bring along a certificate that they'd had their contraceptive injection; no certificate, no DPB. Obviously, once they were no longer on the DPB they would no longer be required to use contraception if they didn't want to.

Julie Thorburn   #229   01:25 pm Jul 29 2009

I noticed on the news last night that one of these women had a lovely big two storied house and was well dressed on her nice couch. Wouldn't it be nice for us all to have such things? Working for less than the benefit these women are getting makes me feel ripped off, no wonder so many people hang around on the "sickness" benefit and dpb. If one of these women have medical issues how do they then expect to hold down a job?

Mike   #228   01:21 pm Jul 29 2009

Let's be consistent here.

From now on, if anyone complains about tax policy, let's publish their income and the amount of tax they paid.

Or are these gross invasions of privacy only acceptable when committed against the poor.

Paula Bennet has quite successfully deflected debate away from welfare policy, which was obviously her aim, by attacking the people and not their argument. I had hoped National was better than this. It seems not.

ian   #227   01:16 pm Jul 29 2009

Gee why is it that on the surface these womaen earn more than I do, I have 3 kids work 40-50 hrs a week, pay for my doctor, dont appear to get half the benefits these people do, Oh thats right Im self employed and have tp pay for most things myself - that will be it.... Why isnt the benefit based / Paid on a std 40 hr week at the min rate and they pay for all the extrs like most of us have to - to hard I guess, Id say they dont appreciate the hand that feeds them and If on a benefit we should know what benefit receivers are on we pay their bloody wages - although in hindsite a more general view would satisfy the privacy bashers

Bex   #226   01:15 pm Jul 29 2009

If you choose to go to the media, expect all the details to come out. Its simple. These women get more per week then most hard working people do with no government support. Do what everyone else does and get a student loan. Why should the NZ taxpayers have to pay for raising their children and for them to study?

Glenn   #225   01:15 pm Jul 29 2009

A politician is honest and calls a spade, a spade, and is berated for being open and honest with information relevant to an issue. Hell! By my reckoning that's all we've ever been asking for and yet now when we find one that can actually do as we have requested she is skewered and BBQ'd for doing it. Make up your mind you Paula bashers and stop being such bleeding namby pamby grizzlers. You can not have your cake and eat it too!

Mahi   #224   01:12 pm Jul 29 2009

Good on Paula Bennett. Obviously these two women know how to work the system to their own advantage to get the maximum return. It disgusts me that people seem to get a lot for doing not a lot. Yeah they are studying and using all the right wording, like, 'jobs that are deemed critical and important'. Well I would love to do some training in those areas, but alas I am saving for my retirement and running a house and looking after my child, and there is no way I could afford to contemplate dropping my wage to do that. The course would cost ME too much. I think benificaries need to get over themselves and realise that a welfare state we are not. In regards to calls for disclosure of Paula's payments when she was on the DPB, how is this relevant to today's topic. You have a disclosure of her current salary as a Minister - isn't that more critical in this day and age? Paula Bennett should have to reveal her payments, but I think to show she is a woman of substance, she could. It will show her as human. Go Paula, you have my vote!

Paul Johnston   #223   01:11 pm Jul 29 2009

I just can not believe this story. I work hard at work for 40 hours and I get $720.00 Gross. There is really some thing fundamentaly wrong in this country when people get more assistance than a working, tax paying citizen. I really feel gutted and am wondering just why I am doing this job. If this is the NZ way, then I am going to stop working and stay home and do gardening and play golf, why drive to work, that costs me $60.00 dollars for petrol, I will stay home and be better of financially. This country has serious problems, idle hands make mischief, we are on a unsustainable course as a welfare state. Paul Johnston

Sonja   #222   01:10 pm Jul 29 2009

Apparantly I should have had a kid before I decided to go to uni and end up with a $50,000 loan.

Lynn   #221   01:09 pm Jul 29 2009

I totally agree with Paula - let's get all the facts on the table not just half. People need to back themselves, ie invest in their own future. Some taxpayers would love to be earning as much as these beneficiaries and have tertiary education paid for as well!!!! How is someone getting benefit top-ups for medical problems going to stick long term to a tertiary course?


Show 171-220 of 230 comments
Special offers
Opinion poll

Do you think politicians spend too much on travel?

Yes - they should be reined in

No - travelling is part of their jobs

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Pagani blog pointer small

John Pagani - Left leaning

Don't set Treaty back 25 years

David Farrar blog pointer small

By the Numbers: David Farrar watches the polls

Mondayising Waitangi and Anzac Days

The Whip blog pointer small

Andrea Vance and John Hartevelt on politics

What to do with the Crafar Farms?