Red-letter day for W(h)anganui

BY STAFF REPORTERS
Last updated 05:00 18/09/2009

Relevant offers

Politics

Shake-up heading in EQC's direction Will bill make food safer or be a form of control? Brownlee turns up heat on council over rebuild Agency mulled to run emergency 111 system MPs' travel bills leap during election Remedial work for navy's problem ship Wait for new oil law before awarding permits, Govt urged TVNZ included in police Electoral Act investigation Sea law 'an environmental risk' Govt defends 50c an hour minimum wage lift

The Government may seek a compromise over Wanganui's name change as it threatens to spark a race relations backlash.

Land Information Minister Maurice Williamson was handed the political hot potato yesterday after the Geographic Board ruled that Wanganui should be spelt with an "h".

A final decision now rests with him, and, if implemented, would require the city to be referred to as Whanganui in all official documents and references. The other options are the status quo, or to spell the name both ways.

Outraged Wanganui Mayor Michael Laws yesterday labelled the board's recommendation "racist" and "undemocratic" and said the Wanganui community was "angry, upset and disappointed".

Wanganui was not a Maori word, but one with a culture, heritage and mana all of its own, he said. Mr Laws called on the Government to respect a May referendum of the city's residents, which overwhelmingly rejected a change. The result showed 77 per cent in support of keeping the "h" out of Wanganui.

Te Runanga o Tupoho iwi spokesman Ken Mair said it was a clear case of correcting a wrong. "If you spell someone's name wrong, you must do the right thing and change it."

The Government is also under pressure from its ally the Maori Party to let the spelling change go through; co-leader Tariana Turia said she wept when she heard the news of the board's decision.

She urged the Government to "do the right thing" and said she would lobby Mr Williamson and other National MPs.

She would not say whether the issue was a potential deal-breaker for the Maori Party's confidence and supply agreement but raised the stakes by calling on the Government to show integrity.

Mr Williamson indicated a compromise could be on the cards, including allowing time for Wanganui to adjust. "Would you, say, make it that you allow it to occur over time as they're replacing things [such as signs]? The modification could be anything in between an accept and a reject. It's not going to be a win, whichever way you go, with everybody.

"It's not something that I've asked for, I promise you. There are things in life I'd love to do, but this is not one of them."

Prime Minister John Key refused to wade into the debate, saying he did not want to "contaminate" the minister's decision. But in May he suggested the referendum was a strong argument in favour of the status quo.

The Geographic Board received nearly 900 public submissions on the change after previously concluding that Wanganui, without the "h", was not an official placename as it had never been formally gazetted. It said it considered evidence of use of the "h" in early records and the fact that debate over whether the name was spelt correctly dated back to the 1840s.

Ad Feedback

"In the end we could not overlook the fact that Wanganui is not correctly spelt and it is a Maori name that is of significant cultural importance."

Rory Smith, whose Tamara Backpackers Lodge overlooks the river, said it was a great decision for the tourism industry. "[Tourists] don't understand why the river is spelt with an `h' and the city without."

THE HISTORY

The road to changing Wanganui's name has been a long one, but gained fresh impetus in February when Te Runanga o Tupoho submitted a proposal to the Geographic Board.

The iwi said Whanganui meant great harbour or expanse of water and, without the "h", was meaningless. Whanganui was named by their ancestor, Hau, of the Aotea waka, more than 600 years ago.

The iwi's request followed the board's decision to change the spelling to Whanganui River in 1991. The district health board also adopted the "h". "It does not make sense to correct the spelling of the river and to leave the name of the city spelt incorrectly," the iwi said.

Wanganui Mayor Michael Laws, who has fiercely resisted the name change, said Maori pronounced Wanganui when Europeans first arrived with a silent "h", so the name was transcribed accordingly.

RIVER CITY RESIDENTS SAY

Trieste Neilson

45, beneficiary.

"It means nothing without the `h' but it doesn't really bother me at all."

Sandra Lansdown

60, Ucol lecturer

"I have mixed feelings ... but it's how you pronounce it and it's what people are comfortable with."

Shane O'Brien

46, unemployed arborist.

"I would have preferred they kept it as it was."

Karen Moore

40, student.

"It'll be a gradual thing, I think, and people will get used to it."

Darren Brasting

41, father.

"It sucks. [Wanganui] is what it always has been and always will be."

- © Fairfax NZ News

161 comments
Post a comment
J. Pihema   #161   07:02 pm Sep 21 2009

Kaitoa! Common sense and historical integrity prevails. Mauri ora!

lloyd gretton   #160   11:36 pm Sep 20 2009

Before the settlers, Wanganui city did not exist. They built it and named it. I know it shocks well intentioned people that the caucasian worm has turned. The caucasians built the modern world that the rest of humanity fully intends to live in and enjoy. The places they built and named deserve to be kept. If any one thinks diferently, that's fine but they should get their asses out of all New Zealand towns and cities.

Dan   #159   10:11 pm Sep 19 2009

Got it in one #6! How can they claim it affects 'mana', and is an insult etc, when it's a word written using the English letter translation!

"27yr old halfcast #6 07:56 am Sep 18 2009

How did Maori know it was spelt with an h before a white guy came along, and started to try and translate a spoken dailect into english. Writing what they heard using english letters. How does this affect the mana of a people, when the letter and the entire alphebet come from another race of people. One day we just started using someone elses written word and now were fighting over an 'H' i want to move to this town, where they have nothing better to do and no bigger issue then this."

Arapo Erueti   #158   09:36 pm Sep 19 2009

If Wanganui is an English word, as some are saying, then what is the Maori word for Wanganui? Whanganui?

jabba   #157   05:19 pm Sep 19 2009

lets go for Fielding next or is it Feilding?

pp   #156   05:09 pm Sep 19 2009

The English language was not originally a written language, but stole the alphabet from others. Again we have people from a colonial english perspective believing that they own something that is not theirs. Michael Laws has appropriated the ownership of the name and now is silly enough to think we all believe him when he says the spelling without an 'h' is traditional english! Ha ha! He is a bigger fool than we ever thought.

There are lots of redneck comments about how Maori have better things to be doing than changing a name. Some even resort to the old trick of blaming them for all of societies ills. Well, the call for the change in spelling comes from pakeha kiwis as well. The name does not belong to the pakeha residents of the town. It is bigger than that, and in fact belongs to those who bestowed it upon the location. Just 'coz you live there does not give the right to continue to bastarise the name.

Rick   #155   04:38 pm Sep 19 2009

@ Charlie Brown #136

Well said!! Totally agree.

Ed   #154   04:33 pm Sep 19 2009

This seems all very much a storm in a teacup.

There are many misused and misspelt words here in NZ that are regarded as normal. For example, nowhere in the UK is the linen department of a store referred to as "Manchester" - that is a city in the north of England, not bed linen.

Nowhere else is a "flat white" a kind of coffee (except maybe Australia)

Nowhere else is a public park a "domain"

Nowhere else is a car parking space "a park"

Nowhere else can any word be shortened by adding "-o" or "-ie" ("fisho", "boatie", "rego", "doco" etc etc)

Languages evolve as people live their lives and adapt them. Wanganui looks like just such a word to me - it may have had an h or it may not, but now it doesn't.

100 years from now, it might have become "Wongarnooee" for all we know - after all, London is no longer Londinium, York no longer "Yorvik" and so on.

We can only go forwards if we are to succeed: looking to the past never brings progress. The past is, as they say, a foreign country.

Judith   #153   11:42 am Sep 19 2009

So much disagreement or agreement as for Michael Laws born in Wairoa maybe he should go back there to be their mayor see how far he gets with his prejudices and why is he on talkback when he is the mayor?? He is not a good look for any part and indeed why you did not get into parliament Antoinette saga you soon forget your stuff ups. Who is the racist in all this..the person kicking a fuss with the biggest insensitive mouth. Indeed there is Whanganui River, Whanganui National Park so correct the spelling instead of wasting money and do your job or is that on talkback?

John Cox   #152   10:49 am Sep 19 2009

There is no right and wrong spelling of Wanganui/Whanganui.

The Maori language was not originally a written language. It was rapidly converted to a written form by Pakeha, mostly missionaries, barely 150 years ago. The spelling of Maori words was inevitably loose and variable for many years. But accepted spelling has settled down now. And there are many anomalies with those settled spellings.

The English language similarly has many anomalies.

Accepted spellings should be left untouched. To pedantically demand the change of any one word is to open a figurative can of worms. Where do we stop? Should London be renamed Londinium? Why spell Paris with a silent "s"? Northcote should be Northcoat, and Marlborough should be Mawlborough!

The activists who constantly demand the addition of an "h" to a word need something meaningful to occupy themselves. What about trying to reduce domestic violence and poverty?


Show 102-151 of 161 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Do you think politicians spend too much on travel?

Yes - they should be reined in

No - travelling is part of their jobs

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Pagani blog pointer small

John Pagani - Left leaning

Don't set Treaty back 25 years

David Farrar blog pointer small

By the Numbers: David Farrar watches the polls

Mondayising Waitangi and Anzac Days

The Whip blog pointer small

Andrea Vance and John Hartevelt on politics

What to do with the Crafar Farms?