Praise for Bradford after MP announces resignation
The Dominion Post
Related Links
Relevant offers
Politics
Trade unions and political party leaders praised Sue Bradford and mourned her imminent departure after the Green Party MP announced today she was resigning from Parliament.
Ms Bradford, 57, was due to formally announce her resignation at a press conference at 10am this morning - but let the cat out of the bag earlier with a message on her Twitter account.
Ms Bradford said her departure was prompted by losing the co-leadership battle to Metiria Turei.
"The Party made a clear and democratic decision, but of course it was personally disappointing and I'm ready for a change."
She will leave Parliament on October 30, but said she would remain a member of the Green Party.
Green Party co-leader Russel Norman said the party would have liked Ms Bradford to continue but also respected her decision to stand down.
Aucklander Dave Clendon will enter Parliament on Ms Bradford's list spot.
Ms Bradford said she would be "going back to the grassroots".
"Parliament is just one vehicle for political change."
Council of Trade Unions president Helen Kelly said Ms Bradford would be "hugely missed" by the union movement.
"Sue is a true champion of working people," Ms Kelly said.
"She understands working people's concerns and, building on her years of activism, has campaigned tirelessly as an MP on many important social issues – including advocacy for beneficiaries."
Barnardos New Zealand said Ms Bradford's work in Parliament had been outstanding.
"Her imminent departure is a significant loss for the people she so effectively represented," said chief executive Murray Edridge.
Labour leader Phil Goff said Parliament was losing a strong and passionate advocate for low income workers, unemployed people, beneficiaries "and other people who might get a raw deal".
Mr Goff said Ms Bradford made a significant impact on Parliament during her decade as an MP.
"Her passion for the causes she fought for as an activist will be missed."
Maori Party co-leader Tariana Turia said Ms Bradford had an enormous commitment to improving the lives of families.
"I have greatly admired her courage and I know wherever she goes she leaves behind big footprints to follow," Mrs Turia said.
"The loss for the Greens will be huge."
A Green MP since 1999, Ms Bradford is married and has five children.
In the last Parliament, Ms Bradford had Members' Bills raising the youth minimum wage and extending the time imprisoned mothers can spend with their babies passed into law.
But Ms Bradford said she was most proud of her work repealing section 59 of the Crimes Act and that fact that it passed with the support of 113 MPs.
"My biggest regret ... is that I have not been able to be a Minister of Social Development and a Minister of Housing."
She said it had been a tough four months for her since the personal disappointment of missing out on the co-leadership, but she accepted the decision of the party.
She said she would now be looking for work in the social justice area and perhaps in the media, but would stay active in politics outside Parliament.
"Make no bones about it, I'm still a radical despite 10 years in here."
She was not leaving because of any disagreement with the party over its direction or policy.
But "it doesn't feel quite right anymore" being in Parliament.
She had seen others stay on when their heart was not in it - they were time wasting and wanted the salary.
She did not want to be like that, she said.
-with NZPA
Sponsored links
All the best Sue
But can she take that smacking law with her when she goes? Was funny to hear her talk about how that was her crowning accievement and how she was happy key did not bow to the pressure of the NZ public to scrap it. So she's basically happy democricy is not working.
Im with post #137, she has done so much for those that cant speak for themselves. NZ politics will have a big whole in it for Sue leaving. All the best Sue, hope you will still be campaigning for everything that is right. Also if any of these commentors are children or parents of children, shame on you. She pushed for the minimum wage and youth rates to be abolished. In the time she has been in parliment she has done more for you and me than many other MPs. Sue- you will be missed!
Sue Bradford was always controversial with rather silly ideas such as National Hoodie Day. Sue also actively defeated Helen Clark and Labour at the last election by her defiant stand on the anti smacking legislation and a devotee of "The Nanny State" not unlike Russia has. When you consider that Sue was NEVER CAPABLE OF BEING ELECTED AT CONSTITUENT LEVEL then she has had a free ride on the taxpayer for a good many years. An ardent leftie was Sue and incapable of change. NZ will be far better off without Sue in Parliament.
Awesome news. Now all the people who believe it is their right to have a defence in the law for beating their child with a jug cord around the legs, have no opposition to their fundamentalist beliefs! Awesome, love New Zealand.
Michael #137. Why don't you believe it? Remember 94.8% of voters did not give the Green party their party vote. MMP is not democracy.
Why do all the good ones keep leaving? Commitment and integrity, that's what I'll remember about Sue Bradford in parliament. Kia kaha, Sue.
Sorry to see her voice will be lost to parliament -- she was a hard working and good person who brought the voice of a minority to parliament (even if it was one the majority didn't agree with). That is why we have MMP (and long may we keep it) I hope other Greens of the old guard don't leave - like Sue Kedgley.
I can't believe we let people like Bradford in our parliament, and her leaving is one of the best things to happen to our parliament in a long time. She is nothing more than a renegade protester that abuses her power to have the last word against a majority she is meant to be representing. I won't be sad to see her go...
What alot of sad people who can not see the eventual good that will come from Sue's courage stance! The bill is not supposed to be a fix-all but instead an attempt to change the vicious cycle that is violent abuse. I just can't see this as anything other than a very well intenioned bill. What type of person wants to physically harm their child anyway? Beats me...(no pun intended!)
Base jumper injured in 30m fall
SPCA steps in on injured dog standoff
Jury sees site where Liberty Templeman's body found
Harawira Maori seats bill 'a mistake'
Wellsford dog massacre inquiry continues
Key 'no GST rise' video emerges
Govt poised to make taxi safety measures compulsory
'Constant breakthroughs' in Hiren Mohini case
Private schools fail to keep lid on fees
Radar 'drone' units used for three years
Billboard used in hunt for taxi driver's killer
Harawira Maori seats bill 'a mistake'
Base jumper injured in 30m fall
SPCA steps in on injured dog standoff
Nintendo pirate just a shy gamer - dad
Crayfish game closed down in Auckland
Palin's ex stars as nude coverboy
Referee says rugby has to change
Operation Titstorm hackers strike Australia
'Lovesick' student sparked airport alert
SPCA steps in on injured dog standoff
Daily trivia quiz: February 10
Eva Longoria in porn Tweet mishap
'Very white' Australian rugby cops criticism
Principal accused of sunburn bribe
SPCA steps in on injured dog standoff
Key confirms GST increase being considered
A pass for Key, but much more to do
King Kong ship meets watery grave
Sanzar and Sky decide it's time to titillate the fans
Newest First
Oldest First
Some pretty vicious and rather shallow comments here from people whose only objection to her seems to be her suggesting they should be able to be charged under the law for beating their children if they overdo it (removing the 'reasonable force' legal loophole). She wasnt saying that anyone who diciplines their child should be locked up, just that those whose 'dicipline' would be considered assault if done to an adult should not be able to to squeeze through that loophole only to repeat their behaviour.
i say best wishes to her and good luck for whatever she does next.
She has worked hard to protect the most vulnerable members of society and while not everyone agrees with that piece of legislation she at least deserves to be recognised as someone who did her best, stuck to her guns and stood up for what she believed in in the face of opposition, as few politicians of our time do. As such she deserves our respect, not derision.