Maori ministry asked to explain rights bid

BY COLIN ESPINER
Last updated 05:00 06/10/2009

Relevant offers

Politics

Prime Minister John Key wins hearts if not minds Shake-up heading in EQC's direction Will bill make food safer or be a form of control? Brownlee turns up heat on council over rebuild Agency mulled to run emergency 111 system MPs' travel bills leap during election Remedial work for navy's problem ship Wait for new oil law before awarding permits, Govt urged TVNZ included in police Electoral Act investigation Today in politics: Monday, February 13

The Ministry of Maori Development will be asked to explain why it is using taxpayers' money to allow Maori Television to bid for 2011 Rugby World Cup games.

Maori Television (MTS) has put in a $3 million taxpayer-funded bid, reportedly greater than bids by Television New Zealand and TV3, for World Cup free-to-air screening rights.

The money came from Te Puni Kokiri (the Ministry of Maori Development) funds set aside to foster Maori development and was authorised by Maori Affairs Minister Pita Sharples.

If successful, MTS plans to broadcast commentary that includes between 5 per cent and 10 per cent Maori.

Prime Minister John Key said yesterday that if MTS won its bid, the ministry would have some explaining to do.

"If MTS is successful it will be incumbent on the ministry to put up its case why it thinks that is the best use of its baseline funding," he said.

"It's my expectation that all New Zealanders would have an opportunity on a free-to-air basis to see those games. If Maori Television doesn't have the capability to deliver that across the country to every New Zealander, it'll need to work out how it is going to fulfil my expectations."

Sky has won TV rights for the tournament to produce coverage of all 48 matches, but there are local broadcast rights for up to 16 matches, including All Blacks pool games, the quarterfinals, semifinals and the final.

MTS broadcasts to about 85 per cent of the country.

Key said he would regret it if MTS won the bid because it offered more money but could not deliver countrywide.

"New Zealanders should have a right to see those games free to air, and that means all New Zealanders, not 85 per cent of New Zealanders."

Key said Sharples had been entitled to authorise the release of the funding, but it would have been better if Sharples had consulted him first.

Key said it might be a good use of ministry money "and certainly TPK (Te Puni Kokiri) and the minister feels very strongly that it is".

"I'd need to see their full rationale for why this is a good use of taxpayers' funds," he said.

Sharples said MTS and the ministry were right to seize the opportunity to bid for the rights.

"The bid creates a unique platform to promote Maori development for the benefit of the whole country," he said.

"This bid creates huge opportunities to promote and profile Maori businesses across the spectrum, for example, and new jobs will be created.

"My focus is on how Te Puni Kokiri's support might achieve outcomes I am responsible for.

"MTS also has available time to extend their broadcast hours and a track record of innovative event programming and strong sports coverage."

Ad Feedback

Sharples said coverage would not be a problem as MTS' take-up was increasing all the time.

Maori Television chief executive Jim Mather said the bid was an opportunity to deliver language and culture to the widest audience possible.

The language used in commentary would be aimed at teaching New Zealanders simple Maori words and phrases and encouraging the use of the Maori language, he said.

- © Fairfax NZ News

43 comments
Post a comment
mo   #43   10:14 pm Oct 07 2009

To everyone who supports the Maori Party and Maori TV dont waste your time on these sorts of sites, i can hardly believe Im writing on here myself. Just leave all these uneducated, scared, uptight, idiots to their little blogs. If Maori TV wins the right to air rugby, it will be these same idiots turning their channels over to the native station to watch their precious All Blacks. . Just stop being jealous. OMG its just rugbyy, we're probably gonna loose the stupid cup anyway. I'd like to commend the Maori Channel for the ANZAC DAY coverage, that no one bothered to create until Maori TV came up with the idea. I can think of nothing better to spend my taxpayer dollars on!!!

Daniel T   #42   12:02 pm Oct 07 2009

@Forbsie #26 "How is rugby part of Maori culture?"

How is rugby part of New Zealand culture?

I don't know any Maori who aren't New Zealanders. A=B, B=C, A=C.

Dion   #41   11:20 am Oct 07 2009

I'm a taxpayer and I'm glad that my taxes are being used for something that I agree with. I'm sick of people wasting my hard earned taxes on holiday trips - (Roger Douglas or $30,000 per year on taxis - (Jonathan Hunt) and how much money has been chucked at the Ballet, Orchestra, and other “Arty” stuff that I am not interested in let alone care about.

There have been a few complaints about the money used to support Maori TV but what about the money that TVNZ has been given over the years, How much were they given to both set up, operate and how much do they take from NZ on Air to provide such quality programmes like NZ Idol, Presenters to mangle Te Reo Maori and to present Pakeha viewpoints on events. I don’t hear anyone complaining about this being a waste of taxpayers money or is this different??

Shane   #40   10:48 am Oct 07 2009

If Maori TV wants to broadcast a mainstream event then they should become a mainstream channel. Simple as that.

Shane   #39   10:41 am Oct 07 2009

@#24 are you kidding? I want to watch the rugby without that sort of thing being rammed down my throat, thank you very much. Thank heavens mainstream TV doesn't buy into that PC sort of crap.

Me, You and Everyone else   #38   10:12 am Oct 07 2009

Im Maori and the difference between me and other people who complain is that I don’t care who has it, as long as its free and I can understand what they are saying, I cant speak maori so it better be english for the important parts, which I suspect it will be. They will probably have some funny comedians to lively it up with a real Kiwi type approach; well you might as well make it enjoyable if we probably loose the cup again.

Nobody has full range of reception, I live in Newmarket in central Auckland and I cant flaming even get any of the free channels with our so called up to date arial and even with a freeveiw box which was BS and a waste of my money, reception in my area stinks even for cell phones!!! So I had to cough up the extra cash for sky which I hardly watch any tv anyway.

Some people stop your whining, providing they make good use of the money who cares...cant say much for TVNZ and its hopeless debacles for nearly 2 decades.

hek as they say, its only !TV BABY!

JGM   #37   09:52 am Oct 07 2009

Don't care as long as it's free! The way the NZRFU / IRB is going next time it will won't be.I am actually amazed that this one isn't being covered by SkyTV. TV rights to SkyTV would pay alot of overpaid professional rugby player's wages! (Might even have been enough to keep a 14 team national competition going as well!!)

Enjoy it while you can folks.

TP   #36   09:42 am Oct 07 2009

Cam #11 01:06 pm Oct 06 2009

how about the channel developes without leeching off the taxpayer how about standing on its own two feet - you do know that TVNZ is taxpayer funded don't you? Both TV1 and TV3 receive funds from the government. Oh but it's different for Maori TV is it?

"And "one country, one people" rubbish, will never happen, or at least as iwi continues to bid for exclusive rights to the foreshore for an example." - had to go there. Maori never bidded for exclusive rights - Maori never intended to exclude anyone. That was scaremongering from Brash et al. An iwi argued contiguous ownership since 1840, and the Government legislated against their right to even ARGUE that they had claim! Corruption is when you silence peoples' right to challenge. How is that right?

Karlos   #35   09:04 am Oct 07 2009

@ WH #27!

I think they mean it doesn't broadcast to 100% of the country on the old analogue signal. 100% of the population don't all have Freeview set-top boxes.

Having said that - I know a few places in NZ that don't get Channel One either so I don't think any channel in NZ can claim they reach 100% of the population.

I don't really care which channel screens the RWC as long as it's free, but you do have to wonder how screening the RWC can be classed as 'fostering Maori development'?

John56   #34   08:42 am Oct 07 2009

@ sioux #20

The other channels were not out smarted, they just have to earn the money to bid with. Unlike the Maori channel who cannot function without being given money.

Simply put the Maori channel isn't smart enough to function on its own so your comment is rather poorly thought out.


Show 1-33 of 43 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Do you think politicians spend too much on travel?

Yes - they should be reined in

No - travelling is part of their jobs

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Pagani blog pointer small

John Pagani - Left leaning

Don't set Treaty back 25 years

David Farrar blog pointer small

By the Numbers: David Farrar watches the polls

Mondayising Waitangi and Anzac Days

The Whip blog pointer small

Andrea Vance and John Hartevelt on politics

What to do with the Crafar Farms?