Key tries to clear up Treaty policy confusion

Last updated 18:36 05/03/2008

Relevant offers

Politics

Shake-up heading in EQC's direction Will bill make food safer or be a form of control? Brownlee turns up heat on council over rebuild Agency mulled to run emergency 111 system MPs' travel bills leap during election Remedial work for navy's problem ship Wait for new oil law before awarding permits, Govt urged TVNZ included in police Electoral Act investigation Today in politics: Monday, February 13 Mana activist on mission to Antarctica

National leader John Key has re-pledged his commitment to a deadline to settle historical Treaty of Waitangi claims after creating confusion about the issue earlier in the day.

Mr Key indicated in an interview this morning that his party's policy of completing all historical treaty claims within five years of election would not be achieved.

He also incorrectly suggested that National never had a policy of a deadline to settle the claims.

Treaty Negotiations Minister Michael Cullen pounced on Mr Key's comments as an example of either policy "slipperiness" or confusion over what National's policies were.

Mr Key told Television New Zealand's Breakfast programme that National never had a policy and deadline to settle historical treaty issues.

"What they said was they wanted the claims lodged, and they'd like to see them cleared up by a certain time, but that's not necessarily guaranteed," Mr Key said.

In 2005, National did have a policy of settling all the grievances by 2010.

After Mr Key replaced Don Brash he moved to slightly amend the policy to take account that National could not possibly be in government until the 2008 election.

In February 2007, Mr Key confirmed that National would tie in the abolition of the Maori seats with the settlement of treaty claims.

"The caucus confirmed that the Maori seats will be abolished, which we anticipate will take place around the time of settlement of historic treaty claims," Mr Key said at that time.

"Around the time of the last settlement – which we anticipate will be in 2014 – National will begin a constitutional process to abolish the seats."

At the time Maori and others criticised the deadline as impossible to achieve.

Mr Key appeared to acknowledge today that it could not be done within the time frame.

"I mean no one can guarantee that, including the current Government, and the reason is that you have to go through a process, and you need durability in that process," Mr Key said.

Labour mocked Mr Key over the issue in Parliament today and after a long silence from National, Mr Key then moved to clarify the issue.

National remained committed to abolishing the Maori seats once the historical treaty process was completed, he said.

"This morning, in attempting to distinguish between our current position and the formal policy document that will follow later this year, I gave the wrong impression that National did not have a date for the settlement of historic treaty claims. This was wrong," Mr Key said.

Ad Feedback

"Our goal is to settle all historic treaty claims by 2014. Obviously, this will be reflected in our formal policy when it is released in due course. National remains committed to accelerating and settling historic treaty claims.'

Dr Cullen said the initial abandonment of a firm deadline came as a surprise and it was possible Mr Key was making it up as he went along.

Asked if Mr Key maybe moving his position in case he needs to a deal with the Maori Party after the 2008 election, Dr Cullen replied: "I think he's got half a mind on that but the other half simply keeps slipping and sliding".

Labour has a policy of resolving the claims by 2020.

Yesterday, Labour accused Mr Key of being evasive over his attitude to the sale of strategic assets after he criticised new rules allowing ministers to block foreigner taking control of such assets.

Labour continued the attack on Mr Key in Parliament today accusing him of flip-flops, secret agendas and policy slipperiness.

- NZPA

Special offers
Opinion poll

Do you think politicians spend too much on travel?

Yes - they should be reined in

No - travelling is part of their jobs

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Pagani blog pointer small

John Pagani - Left leaning

Don't set Treaty back 25 years

David Farrar blog pointer small

By the Numbers: David Farrar watches the polls

Mondayising Waitangi and Anzac Days

The Whip blog pointer small

Andrea Vance and John Hartevelt on politics

What to do with the Crafar Farms?