ACC board chair accused of political actions
BY TRACY WATKINS
Accident Compensation Corporation board chairman John Judge today rejected an allegation he had acted politically over ACC levy proposals.
At a select committee in Parliament today Labour ACC spokesman David Parker questioned Mr Judge's motivation for issuing levy increase proposals that did not take into account a pending law change which would make them much lower.
ACC was legally required to recommend levies based on current legislation but Mr Parker said accurate information could have been presented and the board had not bothered to seek approval to include that in its press releases.
ACC Minister Nick Smith this afternoon released final increases that were lower than ACC proposed.
Mr Parker alleges that the Government scaremongered by allowing publication of the high proposed increases to worry people and make the actual increases more palatable while also preparing the public for user pays and further claw backs.
"Do you think there's a danger that you could be perceived as being politicising these arguments rather than simply implementing the law, if on one hand you say `we should be looking at cuts to cover', but on the other hand you say `well I'm sorry I'm only bound by the existing law when it comes to the notification of rates`?" Mr Parker asked.
Mr Judge said information in appendices of consultation documents reflected levies should the law pass.
"I see my role not as supporting one side or another but clearly saying to this group and any other group that the scheme as it was unsustainable, that one needed to either increase levies or decrease costs/entitlements," he said.
"Most of those decisions are political. Some of them are not, but I would not be doing my job if I didn't bluntly report what the facts of the matter are."
A bill is before Parliament to extend the date for full funding for residual claims liabilities from 2014 to 2019.
The bill also reverses extensions made to the scheme in recent years.
It allows for compensation for casual and part-time workers to be calculated to reflect their earnings over the past year rather than the past four weeks to prevent them earning more on ACC than when working. It reduces compensation for loss of earnings for non-earners from 100 per cent to 80 per cent. Another change requires holiday pay to be used first before ACC payments are made, while families of those who commit suicide or people who harm themselves will no longer be eligible for compensation.
Mr Parker today released a Cabinet social policy report that highlighted some risks associated with the changes.
They included concerns that the bill was contrary to the New Zealand Suicide Prevention Strategy, that claimants may find the holiday pay change unfair, and that costs would be transferred to the welfare and health systems
Asked about Mr Judge's performance, Dr Smith said he supported him.
"I have total confidence in John Judge. He has taken on an organisation that has huge difficulties and in his first year I think he has made good progress in getting ACC into good shape."
He was asked about views Mr Judge reportedly expressed about the appropriateness of the Crown owning an insurance company with a long tail.
Dr Smith said he had no difficulties with Mr Judge expressing views but made it clear the Government intended to retain ACC in public ownership.
Dr Smith defended changes in the bill as necessary for ACC's future.
NEW LEVIES
Confirming the new levies today, Dr Smith said registration rates for motorcycles would range from $327.70 to $426.92, compared with rates of between $511.43 and $745.77 under rates proposed by ACC. But that is still an increase of between $75 and $174 for the owners of petrol powered motorcycles.
Registration costs for petrol powered cars will rise to $198.46 – up about $30 on the current rate but less than the $272.72 proposed by ACC. For non-petrol cars, the rate has risen $311.38, up from $279.09.
The work levy has gone up to $1.47 for every $100 of payroll, compared with $1.31 now.
The earners levy has risen to $2 for every $100 earned, compared with $1.70 now.
Dr Smith said the levy increases were necessary because ACC’s claim costs had increased by 57 per cent in the past four years.
He said the Government had opted for more moderate motorcycle levy increases than ACC recommended but his message to motorcyclists was that the escalating costs of motorcycle accidents could not be ignored.
BIKERS MULL NEW LEVIES
Bikers Rights Organisation of New Zealand president Les Mason, one of the organisers of last month's protests, said the hikes were "liveable with".
"We're pleased that the Minister has recognised that the original ACC proposals were unjustifiable but that is still a very substantial levy hike."
He said bikers harboured concerns that further hikes would be proposed next year.
"They haven't got what they wanted this time so it seems a pretty likely bet that they'll try for it again next year."
He would not comment on whether protests would carry on, saying it would be up to the BRONZ membership.
"Obviously the motorcyclists of New Zealand will be having a think about that over the next couple of days and they'll come back to their representatives and tell us what they want to do," he said.
"We need to make it clear to ACC that this is not something they can try again."
However November's Bikoi organiser Brett Hutchison warned that they would be taking further action.
"They didn't trim anywhere near enough to make us happy," he said.
He said he had been in discussions with several of the major unions, which he would not identify, and said a planned protest in February could draw as many as 20,000 people.
"We're going back in huge numbers."
The focus on motorcyclists was a "red herring" to distract people's attention. Wage earners and employers were yet to realise the fact that they too would be affected, he said.
- with MICHAEL FOX, Stuff.co.nz, NZPA
Sponsored links
This is still way too much of an increase for me. This is not about affordability it is about a bigger income for the Govt. We are going through a mini depression; we are finding CEO's accepting huge salary increases (LTSA for one); Govt and the private sector freezing the wages of the people on the floor and bloody Nick Smith taking more off us through increases to ACC levies; all workers who own cars and bikes are going to be hit 1,2,3......times. If these go through I will be withdrawing my support for the National Party.
Sorry Les, the revised increases for motorcycle rego are not "livable" at all. Maybe if I owned one bike and no other vehicles, but I don't; I own several and am expected to pay per vehicle. Of course, now I won't. I have chosen to ride my bikes unregistered as of the next expiry, as I suspect many, many others will also do.
I note that the increased levies still target motorcycles. I own 5 and ride them each probably once a month. My van with 11 seats I use daily. Which has the propensity to hurt more people, the van! Why does something with a maximum of 2 seats attract such a large levy while a machine which can seat 11 draws hardly a glance. Surely a levy per passenger seat would be the way to go (for small to medium vehicles). I say this because I saw an accident recently where a van was on its side and about 8 people were all stretched out under blankets on the side of the road awaiting ambulances. It made me realise just how many people were about to make a claim on ACC from that one single vehicle accident. Don't tell me a bike attracts a higher medical cost than that!!
Oh goodie. I hope all those saying they wont vote National next election remember this. I didn't. Never have I known a Government to ignore Public opinion so blatantly!! I'm not a bike rider but I think the higher levy is totally unfair. All for one and one for all.
To those who think that motorbike accidents cost more - refer to ACC's own statistics. The ACC cost per bike accident is substantially less than a car accident. Also according to MOT/ACC 80% of bike accidents are attributable to car drivers. ACC's policy is user pays, not abuser. Yet strangely for the highest risk group per Km, cyclists, thier ACC costs are attributed to any car involved, regardless. Consistent aren't they - Who's the next target.
Hmmm pot calling the kettle black. Labour consistantaly refused to increase levies when they were in power. Why not ? They were scared of the political fallout but as usual the shortsightedness now needs a bigger increase to correct. The Boards are the political pawns that bend to the will of the government. Don't kid yourself they are independant. Parker taking this view is a Hipocrite and aligns himself with a party that from what I have personally seen is corrupt.
Why pick on bikers?? why don't they (the govt) make it so pleasure boats, jet boats and jet ski's have to pay Rego and leave us bikers alone, we have enough on our plates as it is avoiding cars that are always pulling out in front of us!!!
Stuart #87 - In the same time period I've seen more vehicles than I can count with drivers on cell phones (which are banned), tailgating, passing on blind corners with yellow lines, driving at 70kph in 100kph areas then increasing to 100kph when reaching passing lanes, exceeding 120kph, exceeding 70kph in 50kph areas, driving through intersections plus had my car written off by someone driving through a red light "without noticing".
I was very pleased I wasn't on my bike that day.
Of course if I had been the ACC statistic would have read I was involved in a motorcycle accident like the other over 50% of motorcycle accidents that involve another vehicle.
So lets hope the next unjust ACC "tax" targets the group you're associated with.
Hi Stuart. In regards to post 87, I bet for every 3 motorcyclists you claim are acting dangerously 7 out of 10 motorcyclists will have to take evasive action due to other road users violating their space. Yes I'm a motorcyclist but also a car driver so if you you haven't done so I recommend you try riding a motorcycle on our(dangerous) roads.
Greens refuse to play political little sibling
Family still dealing with loss of son
Gourmet school grub is delivered to order
Oliver's army set to roll into NZ
Women prisoners cost much more to lock up
Anger at Holmes' Waitangi remarks
North-South split on where to rebuild Christchurch
Drugs education link to Scientology church
Lawyer faces impropriety allegations
Parents don't want son's killer in town
Lawyer faces impropriety allegations
North-South split on where to rebuild Christchurch
Women prisoners cost much more to lock up
Anger at Holmes' Waitangi remarks
Time may be right for Sanzar to expand Super Rugby
Family still dealing with loss of son
Flags and hope on Libya's uneasy anniversary
Murdoch fights back with "Sun on Sunday"
Hotchin's Waiheke property for sale
FBI foil suicide attack on US Capitol
Does a $6 billion return change your view on asset sales?
Related story: Govt says asset sales will cut debt
Newest First
Oldest First


So, now I have to pay more for my motorcycle, despite 23 years of riding with $50 in ACC claims in that time - on an off road, unregistered bike in 1995. Even better is that my earners levy is increasing to pay for the rugby players, cyclists and others. TO say that it is not possible to register pushbikes is a fallacy - it is trivial to do, just politically difficult. Perhaps Nick Smith can explain how, if ACC is so good, how come registration with compulsory 3rd party injury insurance is cheaper in Victoria, oz than here.