Govt looks at cap on spending

BY COLIN ESPINER
Last updated 06:40 16/12/2009
Bill English1 STD
ANDREW GORRIE/Dominion Post
RED INK: When Finance Minister Bill English came to write his first budget the Government's books were already bleeding red ink.

Relevant offers

Politics

TPK boss pays back wife's travel money Activists hacked McCully's emails Greens: Faster Mojo money decision wanted Turia misses Whanau Ora meeting Air NZ example for high-tech public service - Key Nats to discuss Mondayising holidays MMP review may slam door on MPs Get on with it, Mr Speaker Speaker refuses extra cash for deaf MP Today In Politics: Wednesday, February 15

Finance Minister Bill English may cap Government spending even as the recovery pumps billions of extra dollars into the Crown's coffers.

The Treasury's half-year economic and fiscal update yesterday provided the best economic news in a year, confirming the end of the recession and pointing to brighter prospects.

The Treasury said the economy was "on the road to recovery" as the world pulled out of the deepest recession in 60 years.

Unemployment is now expected to peak at 7 per cent midway through next year – about 1 per cent below expectations and equivalent to 17,000 fewer people on the unemployment benefit.

Employment is faring better than expected, with 64,000 fewer jobs predicted to be lost by September next year.

The economy shrunk by a quarter of the figure predicted during the recession and is expected to rebound more strongly, reaching 3.2 per cent growth by 2012.

Next year's forecast deficit has been slashed by $2.5 billion to $6.7b and is expected to be $3.5b lower than forecast in 2012. The country is still tipped to be in deficit until 2016, but the "decade of deficits" predicted last year has been cut to seven years.

The growing economy means the Government is likely to rake in $7b more in taxes than expected over the next three years.

The upturn means the "$50b black hole" – the amount of money English said in the Budget would be lost from the economy over the next three years because of the recession – has shrunk to a $23b hole.

Labour says the upturn in the accounts proves the Government was scaremongering about the state of the economy early this year.

"The Government was very happy to use very conservative numbers to prepare new Zealanders for the worst. That hasn't happened," said finance spokesman David Cunliffe.

Prime Minister John Key said the Government had been reflecting the Treasury's fear that "the wheels were going to completely fall off the New Zealand economy".

"What the Treasury is saying is there is light at the end of the tunnel," he said.

But the upturn is not yet enough to pull back spiralling government debt, which still will see the amount taxpayers collectively owe quadrupling to $64b by 2014.

English said cutting debt was a priority. He said the Treasury forecasts were "a little better", but that did not mean the challenges facing the economy were over.

The Government remained committed to a new spending limit of $1.1b and was investigating a total spending cap, English said.

Ad Feedback

Total Crown spending is expected to reach $65b this year and rise by about $3b each year.

"Demand-driven" expenditure such as health and education, benefits, superannuation and KiwiSaver payments are not currently included in the Government's sinking lid on public spending.

Under a total cap, any increases in expenditure would have to be offset by cuts in other areas or approved by the Cabinet. English said he was looking at "better and more coherent methods of knowing where spending is occurring and what the alternatives are".

The Netherlands and Sweden had spending caps, he said. "We'll be talking more about that in Budget 2010."

Unions are calling on the Government to put more money into job creation, following the Treasury report.

Council of Trade Unions economist Bill Rosenberg said the latest forecast was for "jobless growth" with insufficient positions being created for people entering the labour force.

"The Government should be using its greater room for movement to put more money into creating jobs and actively helping those who become unemployed," he said.

"It is not good enough for Mr English to say that only the private sector can create jobs. We hope they do, but there are enough risks on the horizon, especially for exporters, that it can't be counted on."

Mr Rosenberg said spending on infrastructure, new housing and green development were some of the ways the Government could help.

- with NZPA

6 comments
Post a comment
Anne   #6   08:50 am Dec 16 2009

So, let's cut the ministers jollies and double dipping - that will help!

D   #5   08:43 am Dec 16 2009

andy #1 they need to get on with progressively shifting the age upwards.' __And keep the older people who have already made contributions to the country working. That way the younger generation won't be able to get those jobs. And we know that if the younger generation don't learn skill and employment habits, they remain career unemployed with all the associated social cost. And they remain a cost to the country for longer than retirees do. Also retirees make lousy street kids. __Hold on to the thought, "insufficient positions being for people entering the labour force. We may well end up with a nation of unemployable people. We have a long way to go before we have such a labour shortage we need to force people to keep working.

germain   #4   08:17 am Dec 16 2009

What a laugh, why does he mention "The Netherlands and Sweden had spending caps" ... so what if they do, what about all the countries that DO NOT HAVE A SPENDING CAP?? The Netherlands also has legalised marijuana and hashish sold in cafes, so I suppose Bill will promote this also?

$$   #3   08:12 am Dec 16 2009

Why even bother putting a cap on when what's supposed to be a competent and independent government agency (the NZTA) just decided yesterday to destroy 2/3 of $1 billion of economic wealth by building Transmission Gully, a $1b project with benefits only a third of its costs and no apparent evidence to suggest otherwise?

I was a National supporter, but given this government, and its departments, are all just a bunch of idiots, I'm now looking elsewhere.

Mark   #2   07:55 am Dec 16 2009

Gee thanks Andy (#1), just keep flogging us all along until we're too old to enjoy our retirement. Why don't you go the whole hog and make us continue working until the day we die? That would really save the government some valuable funds.

andy   #1   07:30 am Dec 16 2009

When are the political parties going to have the collective fortitute to tackle the superannuation entitlement age ? We all know that having 25% of the population over 65 and collecting superannuation is unaffordable, and with improving health and life expectancy ("70 is the new 50"!)they need to get on with progressively shifting the age upwards. In terms of the politics it doesn't affect at all those currently on superannuation, and those of us who are some way away from it have more time - and incentive - to plan for it. Cross party agreement anyone ?

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Should Deaf MP Mojo Mathers pay for her own help to participate in Parliamentary debates?

Yes

No

Vote Result

Related story: Speaker hits back in deaf MP row

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Pagani blog pointer small

John Pagani - Left leaning

Don't set Treaty back 25 years

David Farrar blog pointer small

By the Numbers: David Farrar watches the polls

What should the MMP threshold be?

The Whip blog pointer small

Andrea Vance and John Hartevelt on politics

Get on with it, Mr Speaker