Govt looks at cap on spending
BY COLIN ESPINER
Relevant offers
Politics
Finance Minister Bill English may cap Government spending even as the recovery pumps billions of extra dollars into the Crown's coffers.
The Treasury's half-year economic and fiscal update yesterday provided the best economic news in a year, confirming the end of the recession and pointing to brighter prospects.
The Treasury said the economy was "on the road to recovery" as the world pulled out of the deepest recession in 60 years.
Unemployment is now expected to peak at 7 per cent midway through next year – about 1 per cent below expectations and equivalent to 17,000 fewer people on the unemployment benefit.
Employment is faring better than expected, with 64,000 fewer jobs predicted to be lost by September next year.
The economy shrunk by a quarter of the figure predicted during the recession and is expected to rebound more strongly, reaching 3.2 per cent growth by 2012.
Next year's forecast deficit has been slashed by $2.5 billion to $6.7b and is expected to be $3.5b lower than forecast in 2012. The country is still tipped to be in deficit until 2016, but the "decade of deficits" predicted last year has been cut to seven years.
The growing economy means the Government is likely to rake in $7b more in taxes than expected over the next three years.
The upturn means the "$50b black hole" – the amount of money English said in the Budget would be lost from the economy over the next three years because of the recession – has shrunk to a $23b hole.
Labour says the upturn in the accounts proves the Government was scaremongering about the state of the economy early this year.
"The Government was very happy to use very conservative numbers to prepare new Zealanders for the worst. That hasn't happened," said finance spokesman David Cunliffe.
Prime Minister John Key said the Government had been reflecting the Treasury's fear that "the wheels were going to completely fall off the New Zealand economy".
"What the Treasury is saying is there is light at the end of the tunnel," he said.
But the upturn is not yet enough to pull back spiralling government debt, which still will see the amount taxpayers collectively owe quadrupling to $64b by 2014.
English said cutting debt was a priority. He said the Treasury forecasts were "a little better", but that did not mean the challenges facing the economy were over.
The Government remained committed to a new spending limit of $1.1b and was investigating a total spending cap, English said.
Total Crown spending is expected to reach $65b this year and rise by about $3b each year.
"Demand-driven" expenditure such as health and education, benefits, superannuation and KiwiSaver payments are not currently included in the Government's sinking lid on public spending.
Under a total cap, any increases in expenditure would have to be offset by cuts in other areas or approved by the Cabinet. English said he was looking at "better and more coherent methods of knowing where spending is occurring and what the alternatives are".
The Netherlands and Sweden had spending caps, he said. "We'll be talking more about that in Budget 2010."
Unions are calling on the Government to put more money into job creation, following the Treasury report.
Council of Trade Unions economist Bill Rosenberg said the latest forecast was for "jobless growth" with insufficient positions being created for people entering the labour force.
"The Government should be using its greater room for movement to put more money into creating jobs and actively helping those who become unemployed," he said.
"It is not good enough for Mr English to say that only the private sector can create jobs. We hope they do, but there are enough risks on the horizon, especially for exporters, that it can't be counted on."
Mr Rosenberg said spending on infrastructure, new housing and green development were some of the ways the Government could help.
- with NZPA
Sponsored links
andy #1 they need to get on with progressively shifting the age upwards.' __And keep the older people who have already made contributions to the country working. That way the younger generation won't be able to get those jobs. And we know that if the younger generation don't learn skill and employment habits, they remain career unemployed with all the associated social cost. And they remain a cost to the country for longer than retirees do. Also retirees make lousy street kids. __Hold on to the thought, "insufficient positions being for people entering the labour force. We may well end up with a nation of unemployable people. We have a long way to go before we have such a labour shortage we need to force people to keep working.
What a laugh, why does he mention "The Netherlands and Sweden had spending caps" ... so what if they do, what about all the countries that DO NOT HAVE A SPENDING CAP?? The Netherlands also has legalised marijuana and hashish sold in cafes, so I suppose Bill will promote this also?
Why even bother putting a cap on when what's supposed to be a competent and independent government agency (the NZTA) just decided yesterday to destroy 2/3 of $1 billion of economic wealth by building Transmission Gully, a $1b project with benefits only a third of its costs and no apparent evidence to suggest otherwise?
I was a National supporter, but given this government, and its departments, are all just a bunch of idiots, I'm now looking elsewhere.
Gee thanks Andy (#1), just keep flogging us all along until we're too old to enjoy our retirement. Why don't you go the whole hog and make us continue working until the day we die? That would really save the government some valuable funds.
When are the political parties going to have the collective fortitute to tackle the superannuation entitlement age ? We all know that having 25% of the population over 65 and collecting superannuation is unaffordable, and with improving health and life expectancy ("70 is the new 50"!)they need to get on with progressively shifting the age upwards. In terms of the politics it doesn't affect at all those currently on superannuation, and those of us who are some way away from it have more time - and incentive - to plan for it. Cross party agreement anyone ?
Woman stabbed, strangled by partner
Kiwi deaths spur reminder to dog owners
Pike River chief a 'dodgy git, liar'
Third Megaupload co-accused bailed
Hunt under way for young girl's attacker
Huge heritage tree crushes cars
Heritage rules had deadly consequence
Bail denied for journalist-murder accused
Search for missing yachtie to be reviewed
Woman charged over Gisborne death
Earthquake stress blamed for murder
Earthquake stress blamed for murder
Reconsider Crafar farms deal, Government told
Search for missing yachtie to be reviewed
Mojo Mathers gives maiden speech
Hundreds die in Honduras prison fire
Top-12 teams for Tall Ferns late Olympic bid
Proteas start tour with T20 win over Wizards
NZ dollar up on strong retail spending
Should you take your groom's name?
Auckland, Wellington expensive for expats
Matt Giteau still simmering over Deans snub
Adele's ex-boyfriend deserves credit
Earthquake stress blamed for murder
Can Paris Hilton save her image?
Should you take your groom's name?
Gareth Morgan: I hope Norwegian sinks
Matt Giteau still simmering over Deans snub
Proteas start tour with T20 win over Wizards
Should you take your groom's name?
Man fined for selling derogatory clothing
'Legal cocaine' may be new designer drug
iPads make learning a delight for pupils
Tapanui farm dog becomes Lotto dog
Should Deaf MP Mojo Mathers pay for her own help to participate in Parliamentary debates?
Related story: Speaker hits back in deaf MP row
Newest First
Oldest First


So, let's cut the ministers jollies and double dipping - that will help!