Tax reform set to be radical but 'fairer'
BY VERNON SMALL
Relevant offers
Politics
Property investors face higher taxes and company taxes could fall as the Government considers radical options for reform.
A tax working group, led by Victoria University professor Bob Buckle, will today issue its 70-page report outlining options for change.
They include aligning the top personal, trust and business rate at 30 per cent, cutting the company rate below 30 per cent to remain competitive with Australia, introducing a broad-based land tax and a possible increase to GST.
Prime Minister John Key said yesterday the Government was looking at ways to reward effort, encourage savings and help families get ahead. Mr Buckle said the group would set out a fairer tax system that minimised the costs of collecting taxes and reduced impediments to productivity and growth.
The Government has left all options open except a capital gains tax on the family home.
But it has said the changes must be roughly cost neutral, meaning cuts in one area would need to be funded by extra income in others.
The Government was forced to drop plans for personal tax cuts last year after the global crisis plunged its books into the red.
Mr Key again refused yesterday to rule out an increase in GST, but signalled a move was likely on the tax paid by property investors as the Government looks to boost the incentives to invest in productive areas of the economy.
Under current rules, investors can offset losses on rental properties against other income.
About $200 billion is invested in the sector, but last year it cost the Government half a billion dollars in tax credits.
Mr Key said he was keen to close loopholes and redistribute that money through lower personal taxes. But it was "the $64,000 question" as to how bold the Government would be. Its response would be outlined in the May Budget. Not all of the working group's recommendations would be accepted.
Options for taxing investment property, considered by the group, included an assumed return of 6 per cent on the value of all investment properties, which would raise a net $850 million a year; investment properties ring-fenced, so losses could not be offset against income elsewhere, and scrapping the depreciation allowance on buildings.
The Australian Government's response to a parallel tax review is expected to be made public in March, and is likely to include cuts to the company tax rate.
Stock Exchange chief executive Mark Weldon has warned New Zealand must be ready to lower its corporate tax rate below 30 per cent or risk a big flight of capital to Australia.
But Mr Key said a decision on tax reform could be made in New Zealand without waiting to see what happened across the Tasman.
Though the "headline rate" was important, businesses in Australia also faced other taxes.
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
Having seen the recommendations
I think the point that those middle income earners who don't receive Working for families are severely disadvantaged is a welcome observation.
Cam #24: Wow! I understand why the socialists hide under rocks when the Capitalist emerge with inaccurate canon fire. Very defensive and sadly inaccurate.
Latest income stats off the net: OZ: 38% tax over $80k and 45% over $180K UK: 40% over 36k pounds, 50% over 150k pounds Germany: 42% over 52.15k Euro, 45% over 250k Euro
Where is my block of cheese? ripped off!
Unless the government has the guts to intorduce a capital gains tax, the rest is just smoke and mirrors.
Oh great, yet another chance for people to bag out property investors - change the record, its getting old.
America here we come. Rich richer, poor poorer. Epic fail.
We should hit property developers a lot harder. Many of them got lucky with their timing buying up property before the price book in the early 2000s and are now sitting like gods with their massive portfolios - much to the dismay of young couples looking to get into their first home.
But let's not forget that the housing market and consumer spending in Australia significantly assist in keeping their economy ticking over. Even with more barriers to entering the property market than we have here. We don't want to hurt the 'mum and dad' property investors as we all know no Government can adequately supply enough housing for its population.
"its just going to raise Rents, property investors will have to make up for their increased costs as any other business would." - AJ #39
It doesnt work that way im afraid. If a business's costs rise enough, thier model is destroyed and they go out of business.
When the effective yeild of any asset falls (for whatever reason), the value of the asset decreases accordingly.
Feel free to try ramming up the rent/lease on any properties you own though if you would like a painful crash course in the fundamentals of economics.
"I'm sorry but no. Your income is not reflective of your value to society." - Bridge #18
Wrong. Income is the most accurate reflection you can get of one's 'value' to society - the reason this is so unpalatable to most people though is because it provides some pretty ugly insights into the reality of society's values!
We are constantly chided by the experts for our poor savings record and I haven't seen any mention yet of Withholding Tax. The removal of this tax would be a good move and one less tax for IR to administer.
Dad jailed over child abuse that shocked NZ
Woman killed in Christchurch house fire
Five in hospital after crash near Omaha
Wellington train death: Person hit at crossing
Natural burial traumatises family
Assets protester jumps gun on Peters
Murder charge after body found
Drink-driving Jon Gadsby avoids jail
Deep earthquake gives North Is small shake
17-year sentence for making methamphetamine
Canterbury quakes, Pike River reports delayed
17-year sentence for making methamphetamine
Deep earthquake gives North Is small shake
Taupo to host Olympic Football qualifiers
Abbott says Gillard playing sexism card
Maccas in the doghouse for McBite ad
Drunken London Waitangi Day claim defended
More immigrants in slave labour claims
Around the track in M-badged BMWs
Security guard death probe on TV
Tribunal action sought on asset sales
Deep earthquake gives North Is small shake
SBW's opponent hits floor at weigh-in
No Oscar gig for Bret - report
Maccas in the doghouse for McBite ad
Drunken London Waitangi Day claim defended
17-year sentence for making methamphetamine
Wellington train death: Person hit at crossing
Do you think James Cameron's purchase of NZ land is better for the country than the Crafar deal?
Related story: PM: Foreign investors of value to New Zealand
Newest First
Oldest First


As long as the Property Pirates are finally getting taxed then great. If you buy and sell houses for a living then you should be treated as a business.