State Services Commission investigates leaks to media
BY VERNON SMALL
The State Services Commission has launched an inquiry into two leaks of information to the media, one on state sector restructuring and another into the leak of information about mining on conservation land.
Commissioner Iain Rennie said the first of two inquiries into the unauthorised release of Government information would cover the unauthorised disclosure of information relating to a Cabinet paper on the 'Stocktake of Schedule 4 of the Crown Minerals Act 1991.'
Forest and Bird spokesman Kevin Hackwell said this week the organisation had "learnt" the Government wanted mining to be allowed in West Coast's Paparoa National Park, Great Barrier Island and on the Coromandel Peninsula.
The second inquiry would be into the unauthorised disclosure of information relating to a machinery of government Cabinet paper on proposed changes to the structure of the State sector.
Unofficial reports emerged last week that the Government was looking at rolling the National Library and Archives New Zealand into the Department of Internal Affairs, merging the Food Safety Authority with MAF, and amalgamating the Foundation for Science, Research and Technology with the ministry of the same name.
The reports were not denied by the Government.
"The unauthorised release of Government information has the potential to seriously undermine trust in the Public Service. It is critical that we thoroughly investigate these breaches and act on any findings to ensure confidence in the system is maintained," Mr Rennie said.
"Ministers need to be able to continue to trust us to work with them around issues that can at times be difficult, and I expect public servants to follow good systems and practices that enable decisions to be made in an appropriately confidential manner."
He had appointed the commission's chief legal advisor to lead both investigations and report to him as soon as possible.
"It is my intention to make the final report public as soon as practicable," Mr Rennie said.
Mr Rennie said he would advise chief executives of the need to have systems and procedures in place to ensure that government information; including Cabinet material, was protected securely, and not disclosed except in accordance with authorised procedures.
State Services Minister Tony Ryall, who called for the probes, said he wouldn't comment until he had received the reports, however said that any unauthorised disclosure of government information was a serious matter that could undermine trust in the public service.
Labour's state services spokesman Grant Robertson said the leaks were a result of the Government's secrecy about important public issues, and that it needed to look at its own handling of them instead of starting a "witch-hunt".
In relation to public sector restructuring, he said the Government had not even talked to key stakeholders involved in areas affected by the proposed mergers in the state sector.
"Mucking around with agencies like the Food Safety Authority and Archives New Zealand" had far-reaching consequences for the public, which didn't appear to be having a say, Mr Robertson said.
He said he understood the investigations had been underway for more than a week and appeared to be a result of pressure from ministers.
"Given the Government's handling of these issues it is not surprising that public servants want to blow the whistle.
"The Government is serial leaker of information when it suits them. They need to take a good look in the mirror, rather than wasting resources on a witch-hunt of these whistleblowers."
- with NZPA
Sponsored links
to be fair, at any stage of policy development, its still public information....this governments starting to fall into the same trap as the last....forgetting who put them there. Now they wanna rape our National Parks.
National ought to be less worried about the leaks and more worried about why the leaked information concerns people. Oh, wait, it's the "John Key knows best" National government.
Richard #24 yep sure I understand the reason for some secrecy, but the panel allocated for these 'discussions' should be held accountable for their findings.
I recently discovered, at a friend's place, scripture of parliament discussions from the 1880's. It was fascinating to read as you came to grips with what certain people really stood for. Without seeing papers like this, we the public will never be able to make fully informed decisions on who we are voting for - given the rubbish we are fed in election campaigns.
I am paying these people's salaries so I expect to get truthfull accounts of the work they are doing
can't wait for the next election..........
Good on the leakers. If the government are going to shank us then we need people on the inside.
And By the way Dave T if you knew the detail of Pike River you would realise its not environmentally friendly at all, its just the best of the worst.
I think that we should all thank whomever or whatever process resulted in the leaks and long may it continue. If any of you believe that any of the governments are acting for the good of all New Zealanders, wake up!
The Nats seem to forgetton the motto, "government by the people, for the people". Anyone with a modicum of brain cells would have guessed what this govt is up to. No leaks of cabinet papers required.
Tony Ryall is wasting his time, and our money.
matt #13 it is secrative because they have to consult a wide range of groups before coming to the decisions of how something will work. What is the point of releasing something when they have not talked to everyone they need to before deciding? The public will have their say (and if they don't listen then they will lose votes) when it is released but until then I think any government (Nat or Labour) should be able to go through the process without being hounded by the public when it's not even finished yet. You can't run a government with the public being involved in everything. It just wouldn't work.
We should be living in a democracy. A true democracy constantly abides the will of the people. There should be MORE public information, not less. The only way for any government to be truly accountable is for the full public disclosure of all spending. A real time website with a break down of every dollar the government receives and spends, would effect more savings than it would cost and give us superior real time information about our elected representatives.
Greens refuse to play political little sibling
Gourmet school grub is delivered to order
Family still dealing with loss of son
Women prisoners cost much more to lock up
Anger at Holmes' Waitangi remarks
North-South split on where to rebuild Christchurch
Drugs education link to Scientology church
Lawyer faces impropriety allegations
Arsons in Christchurch, New Plymouth
Oliver's army set to roll into NZ
Former All Black Sione Lauaki's health scare
Arsons in Christchurch, New Plymouth
North-South split on where to rebuild Christchurch
Anger at Holmes' Waitangi remarks
Sunshine Coast Eagles no match for Warriors
Black Caps out to keep pressure on Proteas
Local content steady on the box
Time may be right to expand Super Rugby
Family still dealing with loss of son
Anger at Holmes' Waitangi remarks
Lawyer faces impropriety allegations
Oliver's army set to roll into NZ
North-South split on where to rebuild Christchurch
Women prisoners cost much more to lock up
Daily trivia quiz: February 19
Brothel scares and stresses neighbourhood
Clock ticking for Transmission Gully process
Bid to scrap race relations office
One year on too soon to shake raw feelings
Fear of dangerous rift from wealth gap
Anger at Holmes' Waitangi remarks
Does a $6 billion return change your view on asset sales?
Related story: Govt says asset sales will cut debt

Newest First
Oldest First


tit4tat #28 I can only assume you are a National supporter because I certainly wouldn't be looking forward to it if I was a Labour supporter. Their line up is the same bunch of losers NZ kicked out last time. And if you think Labour will be different with a new leader (if you can call Phil Gap that), you are deluded.