DOC officers told not to discuss mining proposal

BY PAUL GORMAN
Last updated 05:00 20/03/2010

Relevant offers

Politics

Mallard sells festival tickets online at profit Email hacking managed well, says Key Buzz about Crafar ruling snuffed out TPK boss pays back wife's travel money Activists hacked McCully's emails Greens: Faster Mojo money decision wanted Turia misses Whanau Ora meeting Air NZ example for high-tech public service - Key Nats to discuss Mondayising holidays MMP review may slam door on MPs

Department of Conservation (DOC) staff have been told not to talk to lobby group Forest & Bird without permission in the wake of the information leaks relating to proposals for mining in national parks.

The State Services Commission is investigating a leak to environForest & Bird of information about the Government's review into the mineral wealth of national parks land, currently protected under schedule four of the Crown Minerals Act.

DOC spokesman Rory Newsam said "given the sensitivities", the new directive was to "protect staff". He said the ban related only to mining discussions.

It did not mean DOC no longer trusted Forest & Bird, an organisation with which it had many close links. Neither did it mean the source of the leak was believed to be someone in the department, he said.

An email from director-general Al Morrison was sent to all staff this week, saying any such conversations with the conservation group had to go through communications engagement group general manager Nicola Holmes.

"It doesn't impact on either organisation, so staff can still talk to Forest & Bird. Relevant work happens all the time between us.

"It's only if they are approached by Forest & Bird about mining," Newsam said. "We advised staff a long time back that the schedule-four discussion is not something they should be getting involved in. It's entirely standard practice."

DOC would not release the email, as it was an internal document, he said.

Forest & Bird advocacy manager Kevin Hackwell said the DOC directive was "a bit of an overreaction". "DOC staff are very professional about this sort of stuff and we wouldn't expect them to discuss stuff that is still under policy development. I think if anybody takes offence, it'll probably be the staff."

He would not say if a DOC worker leaked the information. He had not been contacted yet by the commission.

"[I'm] happy to talk to them if they contact us, but I don't know how useful it'll be because I'm not going to tell them my source."

Ad Feedback

- © Fairfax NZ News

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should Deaf MP Mojo Mathers pay for her own help to participate in Parliamentary debates?

Yes

No

Vote Result

Related story: Speaker hits back in deaf MP row

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Pagani blog pointer small

John Pagani - Left leaning

Don't set Treaty back 25 years

David Farrar blog pointer small

By the Numbers: David Farrar watches the polls

What should the MMP threshold be?

The Whip blog pointer small

Andrea Vance and John Hartevelt on politics

Get on with it, Mr Speaker