Rail buy-back condemned as 'reckless'
Relevant offers
Politics
National won't sell Toll's rail and ferry business if it wins the election but says the buy-back decision is reckless given pressures households are facing.
National think the purchase will end up costing many hundreds of millions more once rolling stock costs were added to the $665m purchase price.
However, one of the country's biggest rail customers MainFreight has welcomed the announcement and pledged to up its own investment if services improve.
Finance Minister Michael Cullen this morning said the Government had bought back the rail and ferry business for $665 million.
The Crown has been in negotiations with Toll over a buyback for several months.
It comes against a backdrop of wrangling over Toll's access agreement to the rail tracks, which are already owned by the Crown, with the Government saying it has been failing to pay its fair share.
MainFreight chief executive Don Braid said the sale would give some certainty.
"There has been a problem with the debate and aggravation between Ontrack and Toll over access fees and I guess the seas were somewhat clouded as to how much infrastructure was being invested in by Toll," he told NZPA.
"Certainly we've seen a deterioration in services over the last couple of years as there's a lack of investment in infrastructure in New Zealand and this announcement may well see that infrastructure being improved which would be good for all of us."
Mr Braid said the company had a "substantial spend" with rail in the country and would boost its investment if services improved.
He would not say by how much; "You'll see it's a substantial amount".
The National Party opposed the purchase but recently announced it would sell no state assets. Previously deputy leader Bill English said it would consider selling it but that has been ruled out.
The Government renationalised the rail infrastructure arm of rail, Ontrack, in 2003.
Progressive Party leader Jim Anderton and NZ First deputy leader Peter Brown welcomed the decision with both parties saying rail should never have been sold.
"The asset sales of the eighties and nineties were mostly a disaster for New Zealand and the conga line of apologists for asset sales should now be apologising for getting so much so wrong," Mr Anderton said.
He believed public ownership meant rail would be improved and made successful.
Mr Brown said the move was in New Zealand's best interests.
"The return of this business to the rightful owners – the taxpayers – will result in improved service, innovation and strong investment in a vital part of the country's infrastructure."
Richard Prebble, a former Labour Cabinet Minister before moving on to lead the ACT Party, was a key player in the decision to sell off rail. He said the purchase would be far more expensive than people realised.
"It's going to be the most expensive purchase that the taxpayer's ever had to fund," he said.
"We've got 100 years experience that the Government cannot run a railway."
Mr Prebble said when he was Transport Minister in 1984 rail was losing about $1m a day. He estimated that would be about $3m in today's dollars.
He said Labour botched buying Ontrack – "Labour should have said to the private shareholders `you bought it, you fix it'."
It went ahead with the purchase without first getting an agreement on sharing costs with the rail operator.
"Their solution to that is to say `we'll buy the rail operator as well'."
There were questions about whether track and operations would stay separate and other companies be allowed to run trains; whether operations would be tendered or run by civil servants.
He suspected the Government would regulate to force the wider transport industry to subsidise rail.
Mr Prebble said it was a myth to say rail was environmentally friendly if the production of rail, locomotives and the need for trucks to take goods to destination were counted.
Road Transport Forum chief executive Tony Friedlander said it was too early to comment on the impact of the announcement but was pleased Toll's rail and road operations would now be separate.
"The Government's decision to buy back Toll's rail and ferry business offers an opportunity for the road transport industry to work with the new operators of the rail network to handle the freight task which is expected to double by 2020," he said.
"But we need more details about the agreement and how the business will be run in future before making any more comment."
- NZPA
Sponsored links
Sell our assets, watch them being run into the ground and then buy them back. It sounds all too familiar.
NZ has one of the worst public transport systems in the developed world. If you break it down into cities, Wellington probably has the best public transport infrastucture. As for Auckland's set up, as a major international city, it's a joke!. And Christchurch - no comment! As a whole, NZ's public transport system is way below par.
The government will have to inject some serious capital into the system, and make it attractive to use. And Kiwis need to start using the trains. Of course, NZers will only use the train when fuel prices go right through the roof, forcing them to leave their cars at home. Don't think flying is going to get cheaper either. Airlines will hit your wallet to offset the ever-incresing aviation fuel costs. Let's just hope that the trains are are made affordable to use.
The fact that NZ only has a small popualtion of 4 million people, means that the public transport system doesn't have a hight turnover of customers. And Kiwis love to drive cars. So much so, most families have two vehicles.
The national railway system needs to rapidly improve. Afterall, the tourists that use it are part of the second biggest industries in NZ - tourism. One thing is for sure, it's a real pity that some of the most beautiful scenery in NZ is not accessible by rail. There is something nostalgic (or romantic) about travelling by train.
Good luck to the government on restructuring the rail network, and what little there is left of it.
So, head office for Toll is in Takapuna at a cost of $11 Million. Wgtn HO is relocated to Takapuna at a huge cost involving redundancies and upheaval. 1985 the restructures started - of course at Government instigation by the Right Honorable Prebble and carried on right up to the end of 2006. I wonder what sort of security the government can offer to the current employees of Toll considering they offer very little security to the average NZer. Mis-managed by Government back in the 80's - how does it fare now?
So far, Cullen has managed to: -buy the rail at $235 above the valuation price -outrageously increased the interest rates -push his way to increase the petrol prices
What more is to come on us poor helpless citizens?
Glad to get out of foreign hand and revert to full New Zealand control of all railway operation, Well done NZ govt.
It's good that the rail is back in public hands, but why did we pay the $235 million above book value? I don't see any good will in the company at all. Labour is useless at negotiations. The reason we bought it back was cos its run down and it needs more money thrown at it to get it up to standard. Its not like there was another buyer the government was competing with! CRIKEY!
A $235 million profit for Toll at a time when many New Zealanders are really hurting financially. The money could, and should, have been used to much greater advantage in really helping people. So much for the government's arrogance and contempt for those whose money it spends so profligately.
Apparently there are now so many people around who cannot remember what a total hash governments make when they try to run commercial enterprises like rail that they are willing to repeat the errors of the past. At 67 I can remember when NZ Rail was a byword for inefficency-an absolute joke. The government of the day had in place rigid restrictions on road freight companies in order to prop up the rail system and in the end of course the poor stupid tax payer paid for it all. Poor systems, huge subsidies and surly employees will be the end order of the day and socialists like Jim Anderton are quite happy for it to happen.
Ever since Prebble was responsible for the selling of our rail system it has been going backwards at a great rate, with almost zero track maintenance and little spent on rolling stock, so I welcome the purchase by the Govt. What it now must do is to charge less for the use of rail so that operators such as Taieri Gorge Rail can increase and widen rail's use and cater for more tourists. I look forward to the eposure of the next big Prebble debacle-when we find out the truth behind the Michael Lermentov sinking, and why the Russians were so furious at finding that harbourmaster Jamieson wasn't censured
Apparently one reason the govt are doing this is to encourage people to use public transport. It would be interesting to know if a survey was undertaken asking when people last went on a train or ferry for that matter. Is the govt going to bring back Road Services buses too?
Wellington woman found safe in motel
Man seriously injured after roof fall
Search called off for man after bridge fall
Rachel Hunter releases kiwi chick
Future Hells Angels bike rides possible: police
Rugby joy short-lived, nation pessimistic
Prime Minister John Key wins hearts if not minds
Debate heats up on national rates rebate
Hospital heads dismiss DHB merger fears
Supermarket, shops shut in quake scare
Dotcom accused van der Kolk 'flabbergasted'
Search for missing Huntly teen scaled down
Man critically injured in Hauraki crash
Pop music star Whitney Houston dies
Gay pride parade may return to Auckland
Phoenix lose game and second place to Roar
Piri Weepu stakes his claim for No 10
Kiwis land big Aussie contract
Ryan Nelsen debuts in Tottenham win
England fight back to edge Italy in Six Nations
Suarez a 'disgrace to Liverpool' in loss to United
Police arrest five at Murdoch's Sun newspaper
Oceania, Fifa roles end in disgrace
Do you think politicians spend too much on travel?
Newest First
Oldest First


Cullen says "What the people are starving? Let them eat track"