Clark bowed to sending Iraq troops

TRACY WATKINS
Last updated 05:00 20/12/2010
TROOPS FOR CONTRACTS: New Zealand Army Engineers constructing a bridge in Iraq 2004. Helen Clark's government did an about turn on sending troops to Iraq because of fears Fonterra would miss out on lucrative Oil for Food contracts.
Supplied
TROOPS FOR CONTRACTS: New Zealand Army Engineers constructing a bridge in Iraq 2004. Helen Clark's government did an about turn on sending troops to Iraq because of fears Fonterra would miss out on lucrative Oil for Food contracts.

Related Links

View the WikiLeaks cables here

Relevant offers

Politics

Click Here
Treaty obligations to stay in SOE sales law McCully email thief could be Kiwi PSA disappointed Key won't discuss cuts Delays in privatising ACC work account No background checks on Education ministry staff Labour fears for Kiwis in ministry shake-up The one-seat threshold Today In Politics: Thursday, February 23 Police complaint over election programme McCully's emails revealed

Senior Defence Ministry officials were secretly briefing the United States embassy on Cabinet discussions about the Iraq war, WikiLeaks cables reveal.

One of nearly 1500 secret US cables obtained from WikiLeaks details Cabinet decisions in which Helen Clark's government did an about turn on sending troops to Iraq because of fears Fonterra would miss out on lucrative Oil for Food contracts.

The claim is made in an extraordinary cable labelling New Zealanders as either "first worlders" – pro-American – or "other worlders" – anyone who was anti-American and pro-New Zealand's nuclear-free legislation.


» View the WikiLeaks cables here


It reveals that embassy staff were briefed on Iraq by senior defence officials, who are not named and whose information is noted as being strictly protected.

"Senior MOD officials (strictly protect) tell us it was not until Finance Minister Michael Cullen pointed out in a subsequent Cabinet meeting that New Zealand's absence from Iraq might cost NZ dairy conglomerate Fonterra the lucrative dairy supply contract it enjoyed under the United Nations Oil for Food program, that the prime minister found a face-saving compromise and sent combat engineers in a non-combat role to Basra, where they were embedded with British forces.

"By then, however, the prime minister had so stirred up anti-war sentiment that she had to expend a lot of political capital to get Caucus and Cabinet support for this time-limited deployment."

The cables reveal an extraordinary level of access for US diplomats in New Zealand; there are repeated references throughout the 1500 cables to comments and briefings by New Zealand officials and diplomats on discussions within the inner circle of government, and US embassy staff have access cards for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

In one cable, the Americans are briefed on highly sensitive talks between Prime Minister John Key and Chinese premier Wen Jiabao, in which he gave an assurance neither he nor his ministers would meet the exiled Dalai Lama – a vow which broke an election promise.

Mr Key 's office insisted yesterday he could not comment because he was in Hawaii.

There are also top-level intelligence exchanges and one cable reveals plans to install a staffer from the secretive US National Security Agency in an office with New Zealand's Government Communications Security Bureau.

Ad Feedback

The most surprising aspect of the cables is how much of the daily file is focused on domestic politics and personalities; embassy staffers file lengthy reports analysing every aspect of New Zealand political life including speeches, scandals, events and even make comment on our politicians' physical appearance.

The cables also reveal how the US uses its embassy to influence public opinion on issues as diverse as defence spending, Pharmac and antinuclear legislation.

The antinuclear issue dominates. A succession of cables reveal the depth of US frustration at New Zealand's stand on nuclear weapons and nuclear power, with one referring to us as a country divided into "two worlds".

The "first world" comprising military, intelligence, foreign affairs, business professionals and a "handful of politicians" still saw New Zealand as a US ally while the "other worlders" – most politicians, media, academics and much of the public – viewed the US with suspicion and hostility.

"Still, our first-world contacts continue to encourage us to, in the words of a senior MOD official (strictly protect), help us get out of the hole we have dug for ourselves."

91 comments
Post a comment
Lisa G in NZ   #91   02:03 pm Dec 24 2010

@Tom C #90

Two quick points: 1) many in current crop of American government are communists, marxists, statist (pick your 'ist' of choice): check out NewZeal.blogspot.com for documented ties. Many of these were voted out last 2-Nov in midterms... but USA has lots of clean up to do.

2) "openly denying Global Warming, it seems to me you haven’t been keeping up to date since the 90s". Wow, OK many in NZ think AGW has been "proven" when it has not and is a complete fraud. There hasn't been any proven or statistical "global warming" due to anything man has done. AGW is only THEORY and has NOT been proved. Do you understand? See more info on your own NZ site climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz or try wattsupwiththat.com. NZ sheepishly follows what the UN wants... and the UN just wants your $$$$!

Tom C   #90   06:44 am Dec 21 2010

Lisa G in NZ, I certainly agree with you on not making generalizations about the American people, and not extending the Us govt,s capitalist corruptions to them. However everything else that you say is full of contradictions. You seeming back a nation who is almost part of the definition of globalization, but you seemingly distrust the, as you say, "globalists". Furthermore, after telling NZ to get educated, you call the American government "cummunist wannabees"?. From the limited knowledge I have of the true inner workings of the US govt, I would conclude that they are close to the polar opposite (please prove me wrong). Lastly, openly denying Global Warming, it seems to me you haven’t been keeping up to date since the 90s. And if you feel that the most important thing is the NZ economy over the environment, you need to reshuffle your priorities.

Ön the article, I think that you need to give some to get some. It sounds less like Cark bowing to send troops to Iraq and more like she make a political compromise for the bettering of the NZ economy and perhaps building future alliances.

Troy   #89   04:51 am Dec 21 2010

The self-appointed World Police (aka America) don't deserve our attention - we have plenty of other allies. Let's just leave the cloak and dagger side of things to those that seek to embrace world power. Go home US, your presence in NZ is so irrelevant, most here are tired of your loud-mouths.

Christiaan   #88   09:30 pm Dec 20 2010

I wonder how many of the comments here have a U.S. embassy IP number attached to them?

Ken   #87   08:54 pm Dec 20 2010

Hmmm lots of ignorance out there. China is no longer a communist country, it's the communist party that is so desperate to hold onto power that it turns it's own military against its own people. Democracy = one person - one vote. In our country we have one person - two votes, so ours must be super democracy. Also one has a reasonable expectation that the government implements the policies that it was elected on. Seems like the current government have done a pretty good job of doing that. The US isn't perfect and has done lots of shitty things over the years but there are not a lot of countries with a squeaky clean slate. Who would you rather have in the Pacific, the US or China? At least the yanks supplied us with aircraft for modernising our Air Force in WW2 in a generous lend-lease programme. One the war was over we had the option of keeping the aircraft or melting them down and sending the scrap value to the US as payment and we took the later option. US Marines trained in NZ and fought in the Guadalcanal campaign, in defence of NZ. A NZ that was next to be invaded and then to be used as a springboard to invade Australia. The Japanese had maps and Japanese currency for the NZ occupation all prepared. Are we seeing a replay of the build up to WW2 but this time it's China instead of Japan planning to sweep through the Pacific? Maybe, maybe not but I'd rather have a US presence than not thanks. Don't demonise a country or its people because of the actions of its government.

Jordan Wyatt   #86   08:16 pm Dec 20 2010

"Of course we go there for butter. How do you think the world works?

We would be third world country if it was not for our farming industry. A lot more people would die here in NZ if we did not get income from diary. Money coming into the country would reduce. People would be out of jobs. The tax take would be less. People would die from greater cuts in health services. It is as simple as that. "

Oh really now! Are we "dying in the streets" through our lack of slaveholding? Or of selling our women overseas as sex slaves?

Please! There is no doubt a large part of our economy comes from taking milk from Cows, who we've treated as our "things", regulated their menstrual cycles, forcibly impregnated, and "induced", to get rid of that nasty child!

Cows are mammals, as are we, they need to be pregnant to produce breast milk, for their children.

We shouldnt be harming and killing animals. Dairy is currently profitable, if that holds up or not, think of the losses to those who kill Sheep, it is still unethical and horrid to the extreme.

Its as easy to be Vegan as not, and its the *least* others deserve. I know I love my Chicken Friends! :-) VIDEO

http://coexistingwithnonhumananimals.blogspot.com/2010/12/birdman-of-invercargill.html

A great website for Veganism is http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/

I hope you'll try these shows too, many from New Zealand

http://coexistingwithnonhumananimals.blogspot.com/2010/07/vegan-info.html

Jordan Wyatt Invercargill Vegan Society

Neil L   #85   05:54 pm Dec 20 2010

@Isabel Witty #77 well lets see why so many (Im one) would happily spit on the USA or anything representing it. Shall we start with Iraq and the illegal war waged against it by the USA under (braindead) G W Bush and fellow war criminals. Or maybe we can look at how the USA has supported and indeed participated in the use of methods of torture banned by the UN to further its own ends all the time proclaiming to be waging a war against terror whilst using exactly the same methods as those its condemning.

Funnily enough I have quite a few American friends but find the mentality behind its (talking about the political manifestation here) actions towards any other nation that dares to have differing views from it to be simply hypocrisy on a scale that beggars belief.

To end, when the USA acts according to the ideals expressed its own constitution towards all in the world and not simply to the chosen few then Ill stop loathing the country's actions and policies.

Andy   #84   05:53 pm Dec 20 2010

Sam #65 - it shows democracy doesn't work, because democracy means every adult citizen gets a vote. This means you have to pander to the mob in order to get elected, as very few people actually bother to find out how politics works or how to get involved and make a difference.

The alternative? No system has actually been proven to work, and never will. As the Bible says "the love of money is the root of all evil" (and in this case the love of money was deemed worth supporting an unjust war and risking the lives of kiwis). All government systems fail ultimately because of greed and self-interest.

However, if citizens actually realised that they are responsible for those they put in power then we might hold or politicians to account a bit more. "terrorists" target the public, because in a democracy the public must be responsible for the actions of their politicians. if you want to make the world a more peaceful place, then demand our government does exactly that. If they won't listen then throw them out and get someone who will.

Alice   #83   03:35 pm Dec 20 2010

derrenmac #36

I am more inclined to agree with you than you may have gathered from my statements. I was trying to illustrate that as long as money is the priority there can be no true democracy - no matter what "good intentions" politician proclaim. That being said, I do try to see both sides of an argument rather than take an isolating extremist view.

Jasz   #82   02:59 pm Dec 20 2010

@nicules #61 -

NZ soldiers were deployed as part of the British Army task force. As all soldiers are typically 'brothers-in-arms' there are bonds and friendships formed during deployment. I, myself, participated in the first Gulf War and regularly communicate with many firends that I made during that time.

'Name me one NZ soldier killed.....' You should hang your head in shame.


Show 32-81 of 91 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Rate the Government's restructuring of the public service:

Good - it's a bloated bureaucracy

Bad - they're cutting too many staff

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Pagani blog pointer small

John Pagani - Left leaning

Don't set Treaty back 25 years

The Whip blog pointer small

Andrea Vance and John Hartevelt on politics

More complex questions on Crafar