John Key reveals plan for asset sales

VERNON SMALL
Last updated 14:47 26/01/2011

PM John Key signals partial state owned asset sales as he promises to build a brighter future for New Zealand.

ASSET SALES: Prime Minister John Key says Treasury will be asked to advise on the merits of selling up to 49 per cent of Mighty River Power, Meridian Energy, Genesis and Solid Energy.
JOHN SELKIRK/Stuff
ASSET SALES: Prime Minister John Key says Treasury will be asked to advise on the merits of selling up to 49 per cent of Mighty River Power, Meridian Energy, Genesis and Solid Energy.
Opinion poll

Should the Government sell key state assets?

Yes

No

Vote Result

Related Links

Old-fashioned punch-up looms Asset sale plan 'positive' Govt share change would provide greater liquidity PM John Key's State of the Nation speech Energy companies open to privitisation plan

Relevant offers

Politics

Click Here
Treaty obligations to stay in SOE sales law McCully email thief could be Kiwi PSA disappointed Key won't discuss cuts Delays in privatising ACC work account No background checks on Education ministry staff Labour fears for Kiwis in ministry shake-up The one-seat threshold Today In Politics: Thursday, February 23 Police complaint over election programme McCully's emails revealed

Prime Minister John Key believes the Government could free up as much as $10 billion from the partial sale of key assets including state owned power companies and a stake in Air New Zealand.

In a speech to an Auckland business audience today Key confirmed National was likely to campaign on partial sales of the three big energy generators and coal company Solid Energy in a bid to pay down Government debt a year earlier.

It is also planning to cut its provision for new spending from the current $1.1 billion to between $800 million and $900m in this year's Budget with Key signalling potential savings in welfare reform and further public service cut backs to be announced over the next few weeks.

In his first major speech of the year, Key said Treasury would be asked to advise on the merits of selling up to 49 per cent of Mighty River Power, Meridian Energy, Genesis and Solid Energy.

It would also look at selling some of its existing shares in Air New Zealand, while maintaining a majority stake.

"No other SOEs are being considered and no decisions have been made," Key said.

The Government would consider Treasury's advice and make its plans clear well before the election.

It would also look at ways to borrow less for its capital spending programme over the next few years.

Key said as well as freeing up capital for other investments, the mixed ownership model, created by a partial float of shares in SOEs, would broaden investments available to New Zealanders.

It would only go ahead if the Government retained a majority stake and NZ investors would be in the front of the queue.

The partial sales would have to provide good opportunities for investors, the freed-up capital would be used to fund new public assets and they would have to be satisfied that industry-specific regulations would protect consumers.

Speaking to reporters after the speech, Key said the measures outlined today could potentially slash billions from Government debt.

"If we could do that with those five entities ... if we can make some savings in terms of what were looking at in the budget and maybe a little on the upside you're talking about somewhere in the order of $7 to $10 billion less borrowing that the Government could undertake."

Asked what had changed since the budget policy statement in December, when none of the measures outlined today were signalled, Mr Key said the international environment was changing.

"And I think we saw that when Standard and Poors put New Zealand on negative outlook because of what was happening particularly in Spain.

"The Government has to stop borrowing as much money; if we don't quite frankly New Zealand will be downgraded and interest rates will go up for all New Zealanders."

On the plan to cut new Government spending, Key said Government ministers had "kicked the tyres" over the summer break and identified areas where savings could be made in the upcoming budget.

Ad Feedback

The Government had already reprioritised around $4 billion in spending over the last couple of years and had reduced the size of the core bureaucracy in Wellington with "more to come in the next few weeks detailing where other changes will happen".

He said this year's Budget would focus on savings and investments.

"New Zealand as a whole needs to save more, spend less and reduce our reliance on foreign debt."

The Government would consider further changes to the tax system, to KiwiSaver and investment products suggested by the Savings Working Group.

Effective tax rates on some forms of saving remained very high, he said.

''The Government is also interested in ideas that increase participation in KiwiSaver and raise national savings, but which don't result in an ongoing and unaffordable fiscal cost, which again would have to be borrowed,'' Key said.

'HOCKING OFF ASSETS'

Labour's SOEs spokesman Clayton Cosgrove said National's plan lacked vision.

''They've done it before. It didn't work then though we were promised we would be better off. And it won't work now. It's a dumb idea.''

The three big state-owned generators had a combined value of $11.75 billion, and earned $700 million a year.

''If John Key's economic plan consists of hocking off the family silver to the foreign pixies from whom he's also borrowing $120 million a week to give tax cuts to the rich, then he's living in a fantasy land.''

NZ First leader Winston Peters said National's plan to sell off state assets was disastrous. It meant half New Zealand's state assets would soon be owned by Chinese interests because China was one of the few countries with ready cash to invest in countries like New Zealand.

"Selling state assets represents a fraud on the people. It is nonsense to suggest that New Zealand will retain control of companies that are 49 percent privately owned.

"Why would any country sell off key assets that cannot be replaced? The taxpayers own these assets - not a bunch of National Party cabinet ministers."

TAX WARS

Yesterday Key slammed Labour's plan, which would create a tax-free band up to $5000 and put in a new top tax rate on income ''well into six figures''.

Phil Goff said Labour would not borrow to pay for the tax free band, and the new top tax rate and a clamp down on tax avoidance and loopholes would help cover the cost.

But he is yet to release details of how he plans to fund the full $1.3 billion cost, which comes on top of a pledge to take GST off fresh fruit and vegetables at a cost of $250m a year.

Key said the Labour plan left a shortfall of $1.1 billion.

That would push up borrowing from foreign lenders, increase interest rates and prompt a rating downgrade.

''There's no magical fairy with a printing press at the end of the NZ garden.''

Goff had signalled Labour would look at ring-fencing losses on investment property so they could not be offset against other income tax.

Key said National had considered and rejected it. At most it would raise $260m a year, but once sophisticated investors restructured their financial affairs ''you might raise $130m if you are lucky''.

He said the Government was borrowing $300m a week.

If Labour borrowed the full $1.1 billion that could rise to about $320m a week.

''Exactly which little pixie is going to deliver that? The answer is a foreign pixie that we have to borrow from.''

Labour countered today, saying Key was planning to ''sell the family silver to foreign pixies''.

- © Fairfax NZ News

257 comments
Post a comment
Blake   #257   11:05 pm Dec 03 2011

Mom and Pop can just pay bills and most have no extra to invest in asset sales. Several Maori tribes have tons of millions and they will buy NZ assets as well as foreigners. The upper 1% will buy assets and they and the Maoris and foreigners will profit and benefit from our assets. Our rivers are toxic and we continue to dump 1080. So the average New Zealand citizen will not benefit at all as the rich get richer and the middle and lower classes continue to suffer and do without and live a less quality life. The rest will move overseas and live where the pay and humanity and health care is far better. New Zealand is being heading down a very ugly path and now we have to endure another three more years of it. Hope the voters get out next time. Nationals relationship with money and human dignity stinks and more will suffer.

donny   #256   08:40 pm Nov 28 2011

Don't forget rogernomics and how much better off nz is with the sale of nz rail and forestry corp with the help of banksters Faye/Ritchwhite,didn't the people see the slave ship arriving.

Its da truth   #255   08:54 am Nov 23 2011

For NZ's sake! The man is a liar. He pulls figures and number out of his lower orifice, ''you might raise $130m if you are lucky''. Again John's careful and calculated use of numbers impresses. Selling off our power providers!! Does this not raise alarm bells with Kiwis?? I like to be able to pay the power bill. This is a short term solution to dig themselves out of the monumental debt they have built. It is not the global recession or ChCh that has built this debt but handouts to their mates and poor decisions. The only magical fairy around here is the one that keeps so many misinformed NZers believing that Smirkey will not sell us out.

shannon   #254   10:38 pm Nov 18 2011

i think the government needs to look at an alternative such as legalizing cannabis. I believe that this would solve the economic issues and we will still have our assets.

Stylow   #253   01:55 pm Jul 22 2011

Its "easy does it" with this stuff. Once they get (or manufacture) the mandate to sell to "mum's and dads" its not much of a step to sell to aussies. I know it might seem unpalatable for many that the government be involved in the banking industry, but the BNZ made a half year profit last year of $283,000,000 which now funnels straight out of the pockets of NZ mortgage holders straight into bloated aussies accounts. I tried to calculate how much money we've lost since the sale but there seriously weren't enough place holders on my calculator. But i agree that had to do it..... it doesn't make much sense robbing the people of their hard earnt cash through legitimised extortion via mortgages when you're just going to give the profits back to them. you don't fleece a sheep and then use the wool to knit it a jersey now do you.

A.   #252   12:53 pm Feb 08 2011

@ Robert - Post 249

So the point you're trying to "demostrate" is that illiteracy equals an inability to understand "ecinomics" right?

I think you, robert, should listen to the person above you. Norway is an excellent example of the correct way to profit from asset sales.

TDW   #251   11:47 am Feb 08 2011

@Robert #249 - Does "functionally illiterate" include people like you who can't spell either?

SD   #250   11:50 pm Feb 06 2011

I believe John Key should consider reacquiring a government stake in industries that do make money in NZ. For example, if the Government were clever enough to insist on a share in the profits that will be obtained from the oil industry around Taranaki (as it is taken from New Zealand governed resources, after all), then this would seem to be a more sustainable way to earn money. I point out that this is a solution that has made Norway the envy of world economies that it is today. Just selling up and getting a one-hit solution is very bad business practice, which I am sure if it was one of his own companies and not the country, he'd be considering differently. Then, perhaps, he can then look to regaining NZ stakes and earning potential from the dairy industry from foreign investors. Why should NZ do all the work and see none of the profit from these gigantic industries? (and comparitively, we see very little profit to what is actually made)...

robert   #249   12:07 pm Feb 06 2011

What this Poll demostrates at this moment, is that 65% of NZers dont understand ecinomics; and even more appalling, they don't seem to comprehend what they hear from the government. Probaly not surprising really,when some 20% of the nation is functionally illiterate.

jay1982   #248   12:04 pm Feb 06 2011

i really hope john key reads these messages and realise the damage him and his fellow people have done.screw new zealand im off to australia


Show 198-247 of 257 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Rate the Government's restructuring of the public service:

Good - it's a bloated bureaucracy

Bad - they're cutting too many staff

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Pagani blog pointer small

John Pagani - Left leaning

Don't set Treaty back 25 years

The Whip blog pointer small

Andrea Vance and John Hartevelt on politics

More complex questions on Crafar