MP removed from Parliament for wearing rugby shirt

ANDREA VANCE AND KATE CHAPMAN
Last updated 16:01 07/06/2011
Marcus Wild

Dunedin South MP Clare Curran appeared in Parliament wearing the Highlanders' old blue, gold and maroon kit in protest at the new lime green colour.

Clare Curran
TV One reporter Jessica Mutch
WRONG ATTIRE: Otago South Labour MP Clare Curran.

Slideshow@clarecurranmp tweets

Opinion poll

Should Parliament's Speaker have removed Dunedin MP Clare Curran for wearing a Highlanders rugby shirt?

Yes

No

Vote Result

Related Links

MP removed for wearing rugby shirt

Relevant offers

Politics

Click Here
Treaty obligations to stay in SOE sales law McCully email thief could be Kiwi PSA disappointed Key won't discuss cuts Delays in privatising ACC work account No background checks on Education ministry staff Labour fears for Kiwis in ministry shake-up Defence staff eye leaving as morale falls No run on Kiwi farms - Key Crown account deficit soars Maori Party warns Government over SOE sales

Labour MP Clare Curran says she was surprised to be thrown out of the House for wearing a Highlanders' rugby shirt and believes it was an "over reaction" from Speaker Lockwood Smith.

The Dunedin South MP appeared at Parliamentary questions this afternoon wearing the team's old blue, gold and maroon kit in protest at the new lime green colour.

Highlanders management controversially announced last week the team would wear a green stripe from next season. 

Speaker Lockwood Smith declared the shirt violated Parliament's strict dress codes and ordered Curran to leave.

Parliament's dress code dictates male members must wear a tie or jacket buttoned up to the neck. Women must wear ''normal business attire'' however there is no specific detail on what is allowed.

Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei left the House with Curran.

Shortly after Curran said she promised to wear the shirt during an interview on Radio Dunedin last week.

"There's a lot of feeling in Dunedin about the changing of the brand and I got behind it last week when I really couldn't understand why the brand was being changed, what the rationale was for it and questions about whether there was a plan to move the franchise north."

The change has been wildly unpopular in the deep south, with various polls showing around 90 per cent disapproval, while a Facebook group against the change has more 'likes' than the Highlanders' official Facebook page and an event against the change has over 11,400 people 'attending'.

Her ejection from Parliament highlighted the lack of rules around what women should wear in the House, she said.

"I certainly never expected to be thrown out of the House for being a woman wearing a football shirt. I think it was an over reaction."

She said she was surprised and would consider whether she would change and return to Parliament this afternoon.

Turei later tweeted saying it was an example of sexism in Parliament continuing. "Has Ross Robertson ever been scolded for his sports team scarves let alone kicked out? No."

Dr Smith told Curran if a male MP entered the debating chamber wearing a soccer or rugby top they'd be asked to leave. ''In the interest of fairness....the rules should be consistent on either side.''

He asked Curran to leave and return dressed appropriately,  ''should she wish.''

''It's all I'm asking, it's not a big call. This House has certain dress standards.''

He said he didn't interfere with her right to ask a question - and allowed her to finish before ejecting.

Fellow Labour MP Trevor Mallard said it was important to have standards made clear for women in the House. He said former Finance Minister Ruth Richardson regularly appeared in a tracksuit and was allowed to remain.

Around 35 minutes before she was removed from the House, Curran tweeted "Wearing #highlanders shirt in question time today. proudly".
 
As the drama unfolded, MP Tau Henare tweeted "Go on @clarecurranmp leave."

Ad Feedback

He then sent a further message saying: "I love how the Labour Party supported one of their own when she was told to take the Highlanders "old" jersey off @clarecurranmp."

Act MP Heather Roy also joined in on the online conversation, tweeting "Yes but rugby jersey is much better than Judith Tizard bursting out of her jacket to display NZ Music Month tshirt sev[en] yrs ago."

National MP Jackie Blue last year showed her support for the national soccer team by wearing an All Whites jersey with pearls in the House.

- © Fairfax NZ News

259 comments
Post a comment
JarvieNZ   #259   06:55 pm Jun 08 2011

I think it's funny when there is a set of rules for one group and another group believe they do not apply to them due to sex religion ethnic or culture and in this case right to protest. There is a set of rules for a work place that "All" must follow regardless the same with schools embassys court houses and sports clubs. I have been to the RITZ Hotel in London and the rules are for men must be in suit with dinner jacket and tie at all times women must be in suitable dress etire which in that case if a women were to wear a rugby jersey into the Ritz Hotel they would be asked to take it off that has nothing to do with being sexist or backwards it is just the rules of the hotel. I find it funny how some politicians complain how they are being miss-treated when they are on 160k plus sallary a year due to the fact the debate chambers is not a place of individual protest to boost your own personal ego. Obey the rules of the house that is what we are paying you to do Miss Curran leave your own problems out of the work the country has more to worry about than a God damm South Island rugby team changing team jerseys. In the words of my grandfather "Dear O Dear"

Pushy   #258   05:52 pm Jun 08 2011

AnonFROMlebanon #252 01:31 pm Jun 08 2011

Yes, there are far more important issues than someone wearing a Rugby jersey. Also, there are far more important issues than some private business changing its workers uniform. So rather than protest the change in rugby jersey, perhaps she should have just turned up in her required dress standard and tried to address those real issues?

GoodGravey   #257   03:37 pm Jun 08 2011

Just in case it has escaped people's attention (and based on the comments it sure as hell has) she was not wearing the jersey because it was a fashion choice.

It was a deliberate protest. Before people criticise her for her dress standards, have a wee think about the purpose of wearing it.

And seriously - if you want to raise dress standards, have a look at how slovenly some of our "buttoned-up" MPs dress. In very recent years, Murray McCully has been rightly chastised in the public arena for dressing like a slob.

If it is a matter of dress standards, then apply a common dress standard across the board.

@Dave #228: You seriously do not want to go there. The "prayer" has no place in Parliament. If I was required to take part in a prayer as part of my work, my first call would be to the Human Rights Commission for infringing my religious (or lack thereof) freedom.

@Ed, Chch: "Typical Kiwi - just ignore the rules and be surprised when it backfires." Way to go - insult the country you live in.

Dai Appy   #256   02:40 pm Jun 08 2011

In Britain, if a barrister appears in court improperly dressed, the judge will say "I cannot see you, Mr (insert name)" and treat the barrister as if he is henceforth invisible.

Perhaps the same approach would work on MP's - although since Labour MP's never have anything useful to say, just doing away with them all together would be better.

Bree   #255   02:09 pm Jun 08 2011

It's not about someone standing up for rights. It's about dress code and rules. How about I turn up at one of here political meeting in a thong and nothing else, would I be ejected?

I dare someone in Dunedin to test Clare Curran in this regard. Prove she a hypocrite.

Murray   #254   02:03 pm Jun 08 2011

Does this stick-in-the-mud conservative Speaker have no wit or sense of humor, whatsoever, even though there is ample precedent for similar intimations ?

She was only indirectly highlighting an issue which is not easily debated, but which was controversial amongst a very large proportion of her constituency.

Ed, Chch   #253   01:53 pm Jun 08 2011

Typical Kiwi - just ignore the rules and be surprised when it backfires.

She should never have even been elected if she has no decorum and sense of place - it is Parliament, not a bloomin sausage sizzle.

AnonFROMlebanon   #252   01:31 pm Jun 08 2011

Our country has far more problems to worry about than a woman in a rugby jersey. I reckon all those whinging ball tuggers in parliament need to STFU, sit down, harden up and address the more serious issues our country is faced with... like how to prevent the All Blacks from choking at the World Cup this year.. There I said it.

Alegna   #251   12:34 pm Jun 08 2011

Oh don't go playing the sexist card! You were thrown out for not keeping to the standard of the dress code of business attire, not because you were being picked on as a woman. What an embarrassment to the rest of us you are.

And how about worrying about some serious issues than the colour of a freakin rugby jersey for crying out loud.

You and your lot really have lost all clues.

jem   #250   12:26 pm Jun 08 2011

Alex #246 "Can't help it that the National government are a bunch of spoil sports."

Get a clue!!! it has nothign to do with National it was the Speaker of the House!


Show 200-249 of 259 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Rate the Government's restructuring of the public service:

Good - it's a bloated bureaucracy

Bad - they're cutting too many staff

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Pagani blog pointer small

John Pagani - Left leaning

Don't set Treaty back 25 years

The Whip blog pointer small

Andrea Vance and John Hartevelt on politics

More complex questions on Crafar