300 military personnel made redundant

MICHELLE COOKE
Last updated 15:01 29/06/2011

Related Links

Defence redundancies: Location and rank of affected staff Waipukurau meat works to shut, jobs lost

Relevant offers

Politics

Click Here
Treaty obligations to stay in SOE sales law McCully email thief could be Kiwi PSA disappointed Key won't discuss cuts Delays in privatising ACC work account No background checks on Education ministry staff Labour fears for Kiwis in ministry shake-up Defence staff eye leaving as morale falls No run on Kiwi farms - Key Crown account deficit soars Maori Party warns Government over SOE sales

More than three hundred military personnel have been told this morning that they have lost their jobs.

They include 81 officers and 227 personnel from other ranks.

The biggest impact is in Wellington where 108 jobs are to go, with 70 job losses at Trentham and 38 in Wellington.

Other bases to be hit are Waiouru (28), Devonport (45) Linton (20), Ohakea (21),Whenuapai (28) and Burnham (28).

Many of the people affected are long serving personnel. There are 110 warrant officers, 83 sergeants and senior sergeants and 61 majors or those holding equivalent ranks in the navy or air force.

Fourteen Lieutenant Colonels will also lose their military ranks.

» Rank and location of affected staff

The decision affects less than 5 per cent of total military personnel and the Defence Force said that many of those who have lost their jobs were encouraged to apply for civilian roles.

Council of Trade Unions president Helen Kelly said the requirement for dismissed uniformed personnel to apply for non-uniformed roles was an "outrageous abuse of power" and wouldn't have happened if the workers were covered by the standard employment relations law.

"It's fine for the Defence Force to restructure, but to then make these workers apply for their own jobs on the open market is simply orchestrating what would be an unfair dismissal in any other normal business and these men and women deserve more respect than that."

She said there were "special constitutional reasons" why the defence forces weren't covered by employment law.

The military job cuts follow recommendations in the government's Defence White Paper released late last year.

The Defence Force had identified 280 military roles that were to be turned into civilian roles.

It expected that there would be 500 fewer military personnel by the end of the year with $40 million a year saved on payroll.

"Since the release of the Defence White Paper we have determined which roles need to be performed by military people with military training, skills and experience, and which can be performed by civilians," Chief of Defence Force Lieutenant General Rhys Jones said.

"We have also determined the numbers of military personnel we need across our ranks, trades, and branches in order to meet our current and future operational requirements."

More than 9300 military personnel remain as Defence Force employees after today's cuts.

Ad Feedback

- © Fairfax NZ News

87 comments
Post a comment
Steven   #87   08:57 pm Jun 30 2011

Seriously how much worse off would the country be if one of the minor parties were elected in? Because National or Labour haven't exactly done a 'TOP NOTCH' job now have they. Whats needed is "direct democracy", where the people of NZ vote what the politicians do. First on the block would be those in Government get a salary cut before anyone else. I feel sorry for those that have served our country are put through by the fat politicians put them through.

defencewatcher   #86   04:10 pm Jun 30 2011

Always interesting to read all of the comments from people who are both well informed and ill-informed. As someone with an interest in defence (but not a defence force member) I have followed this closely and think I can answer a few of the questions that have been asked or correct a few assumptions. 1. The people that talk about the blue collar workers getting shafted are a bit out of touch. As a percentage, it is in fact the highest ranks being hit the hardest with 25% of Colonels getting made redundant versus 2-3% at the lower levels. The Lt Colonels and Majors have also been very hard hit.....the hardest hit of all have been Warrant Officers who are really the top of the "blue collar" pile with about 30% of them going 2. Many of the people going are not deployable but there are also some good people going as there is a target that must be met from a $$ perspective 3. Civilians are $16k per year cheaper as they don't get paid a bunch of allowances or get free medical - saying that though, many in defence would argue that these 'perks' are needed to give them a comparable wage so it will be interesting if civilians can be found to do the same job for less

The Mooster   #85   03:45 pm Jun 30 2011

Oh well at least Keith Locke will be happy.

Pee Wee   #84   03:37 pm Jun 30 2011

Its a pity Key never looked around to see the dead wood that hes in the middle of . I feel sorry for those in the defence force retrenched . I think the army needs to change its direction and train more tradesmen amongst the ranks once soldier training is completed . They would then serve a dual purpose and be an asset and not a liability . The rebuilding of Ch Ch is an example . The gov could help with its own tradies . Millions would be saved .

DevonPetrovic   #83   02:25 pm Jun 30 2011

Unfortunantly my Uncle and many other of my parents friend's lost there jobs in Waiouru. Its not even a letting go itsmore like a stab in the back i.e. pulling off 20+ years in the DF and they go " oh we dont need to assistance anymore thats what the recruits are for now " Its sad, luckily my Dad signed a contract and is safe from this torture.

Just Remember a vote for John Key and National is a tick in the box for " please tick if unemployed "

jason   #82   08:41 am Jun 30 2011

Good move! Its about time the defence force was given a shake up. Navy staff only work a 5 hour day anyway..

Clint   #81   08:13 am Jun 30 2011

DISGRACEFUL!

army wife   #80   11:37 pm Jun 29 2011

well done john key you sacked a lot of people today and made it harder for them and their familys where was the ethos and values they were all taught shame u dont pgame u dont have the same

brightsparks   #79   11:36 pm Jun 29 2011

Why didn't they get rid of more senior Officers? Surely if you wanted to save money through wages, you'd aim for the guys that are getting paid the most? Does an Army as small as NZ's really need 130 odd Colonels?

Alas Smith   #78   10:05 pm Jun 29 2011

What does this say to the rest of NZDF? I work along side NZDF personal everyday and know personally one of those who were laid off. He is a loyal dedicated person who has spent over 30yrs serving his country to the best of his abilities, everyday he does his best for his country by making NZDF contractors like myself present value for the taxpayers dollar. We the public of New Zealand have a social contract with NZDF personal and we the public have broken that contract. Next time we need NZDF personal to come and assist us in a natural disaster emergancy's we just get the response of "whats in it for me?" But they wont do that weather you agree with a standing Defense Force or not these people are prepared to put themselves in situations that other won't and that deserves respect and our loyalty in return. My friend and others who were made redundant thank you so very much for what you have done for this country and I am not talking about going into conflicts but all the work you do in our communities everyday with no acknowledgment, just ask the people of Christchurch.


Show 28-77 of 87 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Rate the Government's restructuring of the public service:

Good - it's a bloated bureaucracy

Bad - they're cutting too many staff

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Pagani blog pointer small

John Pagani - Left leaning

Don't set Treaty back 25 years

The Whip blog pointer small

Andrea Vance and John Hartevelt on politics

More complex questions on Crafar