Ad Feedback

$26m to renew Tranz Alpine

The Press
Last updated 22:47 22/07/2008

Relevant offers

Politics

Sharples' stepson to be ordained in marae first Buy your furniture or we'll sell it, Crown tells ministers Harawira may not be forced out of party Consultants 'scandalous waste of money' Complaints about Harawira flood in 'Sticking points' stall ETS Parents know better than you, Children's Commissioner told Auckland Supercity structure unveiled Copenhagen negotiations on track - Groser National makes progress on ETS bill support

The South Island's Tranz Alpine railway is to get a facelift worth nearly $26 million the first step in a major upgrade of the country's train services.

The move to replace all trains on the scenic Greymouth to Christchurch line was announced by the Government yesterday as part of an $80.2m, five-year programme to address safety and maintenance issues nationwide.

Figures obtained by The Press showed that $53.04m of that total was to be spent on the three-line Tranz Scenic rail network.

With $25.54m going to the Tranz Alpine, the balance of $27.5m is to be divided between the Tranz Coastal line from Christchurch to Picton and the North Island's Overlander route from Wellington to Auckland.

A further $800,000 has been earmarked for an upgrade of Picton's ferry terminal.

Finance Minister Michael Cullen announced the overhaul, saying the balance of the $80.2m would be ploughed into improving commuter services for Auckland and Wellington.

"The selling off our rail system in the 1990s was followed by asset-stripping and a failure to properly invest in the services," Cullen said. "Despite some improvements in the past few years, a significant investment is required just to keep some existing services running."

Cullen said yesterday's investment would allow upgrades to locomotives and wagons, the continuation of current locomotive upgrade programmes and the eventual replacement of the entire Tranz Scenic fleet.

Last month, the Government bought rail back into public ownership, paying Toll Holdings $690m and renaming the service KiwiRail.

It put former National prime minister Jim Bolger in charge in a move seen as an effort to deflect criticism from political opponents.

Labour indicated there would be major investment in rail services costing taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.

Despite that, a One News Colmar Brunton poll released on Monday showed huge public support for the plan. Of 1000 people surveyed, 68 per cent said they supported it.

Bolger yesterday welcomed the initial investment, but said more would be needed.

"I'm confident that KiwiRail will be a major success for New Zealand's economy, but it's clear significant investment will be required to make that happen," he said.

Cullen said that yesterday's cash injection was only a "holding action". "Cabinet will consider, within a few weeks, the more expensive investment programme designed to upgrade and that would include new locomotives, not simply refurbished ones."

Official documents show the Government sees replacing carriages and locomotives on the Tranz Alpine service as a priority.

Ad Feedback

The documents said the work to be done at the Picton ferry terminal was prompted by "safety concerns" and would focus on the vehicle marshalling facilities "which are in poor condition".

 

9 comments
Jon Reeves   #9   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

This investment is timely and desperately needed. All other first world countries are investing in passenger rail, and extending it. Even in the home of the car, the USA, congress recently provided huundreds of millions of dollars for more passenger carriages and service extensions.

It was clear that the NATIONAL experiment of privatised railways failed badly. Thank god we have a future thinking government to have obtained the railways back at a small price. Even if we spend $1.2B on our railways, cheaper than the roads which have a massive decline in usage. $1.2 will build just 18 kms of motorway, or we have 4000kms of railways, 300 locos, 4000 freight wagons etc... Good value for New Zealand.

And trucks? Well, they never have paid their own way, so we ALL subsidise the massive trucking mogals making millions in profit.

Hadley   #8   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

$26 million!! $26 million!! How many hot meals for hungry people could that buy? At least 2.6 million!

Millsy   #7   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

...whereas CJH wants to save rail by destorying it.....

Ripping up all the tracks....

A true fan of Richard Prebble.

DJ   #6   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Renationalizing the railways was a necessary thing, and I'm glad that the government had the guts to do it.

We taxpayers subsidize a lot of services that we may never use, but that's the price of living in a civilized society.

LocoTorque   #5   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Poor, deprived, sad CJH! Buy a ticket, ride the rails from Picton to Christchurch! Next day, ride the Midland Line and see the other side of the Torlesse Range, the side you can't see unless you are a climber or a very skilled airplane pilot. Spend a few minutes in that open car, feel the rush of the wind and smell the diesel smoke, all at no extra cost. Spend a few seconds on the rocking plate between the cars and experience the little thrill. Get a life.

Bob Jackson   #4   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Due to the high cost of oil, wouldit not be wise to complete the electrification of the main trunk line from Hamilton to Auckland?

Norman   #3   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Another country on the same track gauge recently bought a power car and three coaches, a one off for $2.6 million NZD, off China to a Western spec (nice seats, air suspension, DVD players, etc.). Based on the recent coach contracts I assume this contract for Hillside is for 18 coaches.

So off China for the Tranz Alpine we could get 12 more coaches and the 10 diesel power cars to pull the coaches for the same money.

For a saving of $21 million we could replace all the long distance coaches in the country and get the locos for free. Are the extra jobs at Hillside in Dunedin worth $21 million ? Too many decisions with heart not head ? .... because similar arguments can be made for the new locos too !

Beth   #2   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

CJH- I fully support this plan. Pecause of National selling off the rail, its fallen to pieces. Now Labour has to clean up Nationals mess. Again. Without the Senic Rail, what would happen to most of the tourism related jobs in the area? With a decent upgrade, think how many more tourists, and kiwis, will use the rail, providing more jobs and making it more affordable. If the rail was in better condition, and safer, a lot more 'kiwis' would use it.

New Zealanders dont care what the rail network is called, its changed so many times over the years and is not 'wool over our eyes' - it's a name that tourists can relate to... have you heard of 'eurail'?

We don't need more tax cuts, we need to properly invest in our tourism industry, among other things, without it New Zealand is screwed.

CJH   #1   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

I feel sorry for you Kiwi taxpayers who are paying and subsidising a service most of you will not ever use. Does anybody remember when the Green Party campaigned to "save the rail" and yet none of them actually used the trains to get around.

Labour are screwing you all, naming it "Kiwirail" is just a sad attempt to pull the wool over your eyes. Vote them out and stop encouraging politicans wasting your money when it is safer in your own pockets!

Ad Feedback
Special offers

Featured Promotions