Charter schools job 'not confirmed'

DANYA LEVY
Last updated 16:26 01/02/2012
Catherine Isaac
CATHERINE ISAAC: Served three terms as a school trustee.

Relevant offers

Politics

Click Here
Treaty obligations to stay in SOE sales law McCully email thief could be Kiwi PSA disappointed Key won't discuss cuts Delays in privatising ACC work account No background checks on Education ministry staff Labour fears for Kiwis in ministry shake-up The one-seat threshold Today In Politics: Thursday, February 23 Police complaint over election programme McCully's emails revealed

Former ACT president Catherine Isaac has defended her proposed appointment to lead a trial of charter schools.

The as-yet unconfirmed role has been criticised by political and academic opponents of the scheme.

Isaac said she was ''not entirely surprised'' by the outcry, but insisted she would ''do a more than competent job''.

''I didn't put my hand up for the role,'' the Wellington businesswoman said today. ''I was invited to take it on and I am very pleased to serve. It's not confirmed yet.

''I'm honoured to have the responsibility. I think I will be able to do a more than competent job. I've had a great deal of involvement in the public policy world and in education in particular and in the public and private sectors. I think I've got a reasonably strong, broad background for the role.''

Isaac, who stood as a candidate for ACT is last year's election, is managing director of a public relations firm. She served on the welfare working group, set up by the government to review the welfare system.

She also served on the board of trustees of Wellington College between 1995 and 2001 and the city's Clifton Terrace Model School.

Isaac denied suggestions by the PPTA that the appointment - by sole ACT MP John Banks - was ''ideologically driven'' or politically motivated.

"It's been a long standing ACT policy, I've always been supportive of it and I've contributed to their work in it.''

Her pending appointment was a provocative move, according to an academic.

Prime Minister John Key today said former Isaac was yet to be confirmed to head a charter schools trial, but said he has no problem with her appointment.

"I think very highly of her," he told reporters on his way in a day-long National caucus retreat at Premier House.

"She's got lots of skills and ability and could be very good."

Trials of charter schools will be carried out in Auckland and Christchurch as part of ACT's support agreement with the National-led Government.

They have been controversial among experts and Auckland University Associate Professor Peter O'Connor today described Isaacs' appointment as "a provocative move".

There was "almost universal rejection of the notion of charter schools within the education academy", O'Connor said.

"If this is the kind of appointment that is going to be made, it's worrying, because you really have to wonder if this is about raising the achievement of kids or it is about some ideological agenda that's been set that needs to be played out," O'Connor said.

Ad Feedback

"If that's the case, trying to have a debate on the evidence is going to be really difficult.''

Association Education Minister and ACT's lone MP John Banks this morning said Isaac would head a five-member implementation committee.

Isaac, who was number two on ACT's list in last year's election, is the wife of the late Business Round Table head Roger Kerr and has been tipped as the next leader of the party.

Key said Banks had gotten "one step ahead of the process" and Isaac's name was "in the mix".

"I know people have sounded me out, I'm comfortable with it but the finalised appointment hasn't been made."

The Greens today criticised the pending appointment as "jobs for the Government's mate's".

However, Key said there wouldn't be many people applying for jobs if the Government rules everyone out on the basis of their political affiliations.

He did not believe it was a bad look.

"We as a Government have been quite careful with our appointments.

"There will always be some people who we know and, through our experiences and our political linkages, are appointed to positions but we have appointed lots of people who have links to our opponents."

Charter schools were not part of National's election campaign and although they were part of ACT's education policy, opponents say there is no public mandate for them because the single-MP party garnered just 1.07 per cent of the party vote.

Key said not every specific issue gets debated in an election campaign and the vast bulk of New Zealand children would not go near a charter school.

Students would be there by choice.

Education Minister Hekia Parata, who has ultimate responsibility for the trial, said the appointment shouldn't come as a surprise.

"I think it's pretty clear to the public, because it's in the confidence and supply agreement between ourselves and the ACT Party, that this was a particular initiative we would be exploring and implementing."
National was still working through details of the terms of reference for the committee.

The two trial schools were expected to be up and running by the end of this Parliamentary term in 2014.

Green education spokeswoman Catherine Delahunty today described Isaac's pending appointment as "disturbing".

"The trial now looks like a joke.

"It shows this is nothing to do with education, it's to do with the Government's agenda to turn the education system into a business opportunity."

Isaac's three terms as a school trustee did not qualify her for the role, said Delahunty who has also been a school trustee.

"This is a major political platform for education. It is a change in direction. It is not something for amateurs."

Banks this morning defended Isaac's pending appointment.

"Catherine Isaac is a well-known Wellington businesswoman who has extensive contacts within the public policy and education sector."

Suggestions her appointment was nepotism was "the negative spin of the media".

"It's someone I have confidence in and trust with, it's very sensible."

Independent charter schools are run in the United States and the United Kingdom, but are controversial because they can be owned by private businesses or community groups and are free to set their own curriculum, school term and pay levels.

- © Fairfax NZ News

130 comments
Post a comment
Jackie   #130   12:05 pm Feb 15 2012

Beware Charter schools for Muslims - the Saudis are very generous in this area. Do we want an education that teaches the superiority of Islam, the separation of the sexes, the secondary position of women, an unnatural morality, a biased history: that fosters dissension between Sunni and Shia - not in our country please. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth seems to be the most followed message.

John   #129   02:28 pm Feb 03 2012

Charter schooling is an alternative for students who are not engaging in the current education system. These students are not failing the system, rather the system is failing the students. These students are not dumb, they struggle to personlise NCEA. Parents and students must have choices when it comes to education because their children are only teenages once. Charter schooling is not about taking over the current education system and turning it upside down, it is about giving parents an their childern a choice and getting the tax payer to support it, instead of this one blanket fits all education system we have. The biggest fear that the protectors of the current education system have is, "there is no extra money for education in the budget". If Charter schools is to start and be successful, education money will go from Peter to Paul and they will be Peter. They dont realy care about the students and their families. All they care about is serving a system that

School Days   #128   10:19 pm Feb 02 2012

Now come on everybody, Catherine Isaac will bring a wealth of experience to the role. Her business acumen and understanding of the interplay between public needs and financial governance is just what's needed for the education of our children.

Just look at everything thing she's achieved for Zealandia.

Oh, hang on...

Nick   #127   06:59 pm Feb 02 2012

@michael #121 Ignoring the fact that National got 47% which is not a majority and the parties that make up the government got 50.41% of the party votes which isn't a large majority - even if you followed their policies and voted accordingly this was never National's policy and there was no indication before the election that charter schools were on the agenda.

Appointing Isaac to this role makes an idea that stunk already stink even more. A clear case of not what you know but who you know.

@TC #117 - Exactly, public services certainly should be efficient, but they have a role to play in society that doesn't translate to a direct business case. Those that know should be running these services.

Observer in NZ   #126   05:18 pm Feb 02 2012

In the U.S. where charter schools are popular, schools are almost completely funded from your local community. If you live in a small town or a poor neighborhood in a city, you WILL go to bad public school. They won't have the money to pay teachers properly and the facilities will be falling apart.

That is the reason for charter schools in most cases, to get less well off children a chance to succeed, because the public schools (and the system in general) is clearly failing them.

I'm not sure we have the same problems here in New Zealand. So what's the need for this? Aren't NZ public schools like #5 in the world?

brybry   #125   11:43 am Feb 02 2012

The problem with our education system as far as National and ACT is concerned it that it is actually rated quite highly internationally. This will not do. We might accidentally produce critical thinkers and thoughtful citizens. This is not what school was designed to provide. In order to turn out unthinking, unquestioning farm/factory-bots we need to overhaul the education system - and what better way to do that than to give the job of knobbling the current system to an unqualified right-wing nutjob.

@michael   #124   10:39 am Feb 02 2012

"National won by a large majority" ... Who better to reform our education system than people teaching us that 47% is a majority...

Cherrie   #123   03:45 am Feb 02 2012

Why would you want to start a charter school like then have in the U.S.A? We are currently living in the U.S.A and just realizead how better off we were if our daughter had gone to a public school in Wellington.The charter school you have to go in a lottery because everyone wants to send their children to a charter school and not pay for private school.The public schools gets neglected because of charter schools.Since we arrived late to be even considered for a charter school,we had to bite the bullet and send our child to a private school.Rather on setting up charter schools,why doesn't the government look at improving the public schools that needed them,employ more teachers,introduce more choice of subjects in the curriculum and decrease the number of students per teachers.The government needs to invest in the system they have now,there is no need for charter schools.U.S.A education system is not the way to go,may be look at their curriculums but,not charter schools.

michael   #122   01:13 am Feb 02 2012

to will # 7 if you" cannot believe the absolute contempt ACT and National have for the NZ population at the moment" were where you when JK &JB were having their cup of tea and the subsequent scandal about what was recorded?That was contempt at it's highest yet NZ still voted them in.Hopefully now that the RWC is some distance behind us NZ will wake up and realise just what they did in the last election.

michael   #121   01:03 am Feb 02 2012

We shouldn't complain, National won the election by a large majority.NZ had an election , a chance to view all policies from all parties and this is what they voted for..you did vote ..didnt you.


Show 71-120 of 130 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Rate the Government's restructuring of the public service:

Good - it's a bloated bureaucracy

Bad - they're cutting too many staff

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Pagani blog pointer small

John Pagani - Left leaning

Don't set Treaty back 25 years

The Whip blog pointer small

Andrea Vance and John Hartevelt on politics

More complex questions on Crafar