Church opposes baby sex selection
Relevant offers
Politics
Presbyterians have called for the Government to reject a proposal to allow parents to select the sex of their children.
A recommendation from a committee of Protestant bioethical experts calling for a ban on sex selection for non-medical reasons was voted in virtually unopposed at the Presbyterians' biannual general assembly.
The Bioethics Council, a ministerial advisory committee, recommended in June that the ban on using pre-implantation genetic diagnosis to select a baby's sex purely for social reasons be lifted.
However, the joint Presbyterian, Methodist and Anglican Inte-church Bioethics Council declared the idea "undesirable" on social and cultural grounds.
Chairwoman Audrey Jarvis, a retired ethicist and molecular biologist, said the practice offered no benefit to the child and served only the needs of the parents.
"The situation should not be that the value of a child depends on its gender."
Laws introduced four years ago banned sex selection except when there is a risk that the child will be born with a sex-linked genetic condition, such as haemophilia. It is also banned in Australia and Britain, but the United States has no restrictions.
The committee had no objection to sex selection on medical grounds, for example if there was a family history of haemophilia - which is found only in males.
But allowing it for other reasons would be a move toward the "commodification" of embryos, Dr Jarvis said.
There was little debate or discussion about the recommendation when it was put to assembly delegates in Upper Hutt on Friday.
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
God has a plan for everyone. i would never choose a gender. If god wants to me have a boy, then he will give me a son. Same with daughter...
I have two boys and would love a little girl. theres alot of information out there in regards to gender selection naturally how is this any better than through PGD, we are not asking them to genteically desgin a baby eg make it have blue eyes and blonde hair. its only giving you either a boy or a girl how is that wrong. they are testing the embryo for defects anyway, isnt that messing with mother nature also infact ivf is messing with mother nature entially. so if ya gonna critise gender selcetion you better critise the whole medical profession.
Kiwitrue..you state that Christians have "have no idea as to what is true" and are "confused", and then you agree with them by stating "As for Sex Selection it is not natural which makes it not right..".
I'm not sure it is the Christians who are confused.
Dear Susanna you have COMPLETELY missed my point. When I stated that "some Presbyterians may believe in evolution", I was commenting on response #4 whose author wrote "Presbyterians believe in fairy tales..." thus I was equating evolution to a fairy tale - which seems to be your point. In attacking me you have attacked yourself! Personally I believe that there is absolute PROOF that micro evolution has occured - that species evolve over time. The study of Drosophila fruit flies in Hawaii confirms this. What I am NOT convinced of is that macro evolution has occurred. Nothing in the Bible, in my opinion, is undermined by this position - in fact I think the Bible is found to be correct - God made them "male and female" and they "reproduce after their kind". I think this is what the scientific evidence is showing us. Also your statement "You cannot be a girl but still have male organs..." is wrong - what about hermaphrodites? Christians have NOTHING to fear from acknowledging that (micro) evolution occurs and hermaphrodites exist.
Gender selection doesn't imply that one gender is better. As an example, if somebody wants to have a healthy child, that doesn't mean that they think children with genetic disabilities are inferior as people.
And, if the gender balance starts to get out of hand, ONLY THEN should we restrict sex selection (at least, selecting of the more popular gender should be prohibited until it goes back to equal).
Sorry Malcolm but you cannot be both a Presbyterian and an Evolutionist. Its like being a girl and a boy. I totally doesn't work. You see, you either believe in the whole of the Bible as Gods truth or none of it. You can't believe only in some of it because that is implying that God is lying by writing something untrue. In the beginning of the Bible it says GOD CREATED THE WORLD. If you were really a Christian you would believe that. You cannot be a girl but still have male organs for instance you are either one or the other. No fence sitting.
Ewww gender selection is so wrong. By selecting a gender you are implying that there is something wrong with the other gender, which is completely absurd! We should just be happy with what we have because both genders are equal and have equal potential. Otherwise might become like China. In China it is estimated that the boy girl ratio is 3:1.
Jane, you state "Never would I agree with anything a church would say...". What if the church said, as they all do, "Love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you". This is a direct quote from Jesus. It's in the Bible so all the churches say it. (They may not live it out perfectly but that is not Jesus' fault).Don't you think this is a good idea? What if, instead of hating, we all learnt to love, not only our family, not just our neighbours, but our enemies as well. Wouldn't we all be better off? (The alternative, hating our enemies, has been tried throughout all of history and has been found wanting.) Please think about this the next time you are tempted to state things like "Never would I agree with anything a church would say". God bless you.
Heah Heah Paul - I Agree - You Tell E'm mate these so called christians who have no idea as to what is true and what is not, make you wonder sometimes but then again they are obviously lost sheep who has wondered off into pasture and don't know how to get home. There's a name for these type people "CONFUSED" As for Sex Selection it is not natural which makes it not right to chose a gender to suit ones flavours becomes "X RATED"
Megaupload accused to spend another weekend in jail
Teen jailed for sexual assault
Hundreds newly red-zoned but many in limbo
Boy killed by log 'adored by everyone'
Man hospitalised after explosion
Expert criticises Pike River safety refuge
Agency mulled to run emergency 111 system
Wrong boot costs adventurer his life
New Zealanders caught in Maldives coup
Pulp mill fined $37,000 over worker's fall
Wellington man fit for trial on wife's murder
Hundreds newly red-zoned but many in limbo
Apple factory hacked amid global activist stunt
Shoppers spend more on credit, debit cards
Flushed necklace returned months later
Fonterra taps NZX to run farmer share trading
Briton wanted in 1993 heist nabbed in US
Another horror show for Michael Campbell
Wrong boot costs adventurer his life
Radio station's divorce promo 'cowardly'
Boy killed by log 'adored by everyone'
Cameras capture girl's abduction ordeal
Infratil founder Lloyd Morrison dies of cancer
NZ woman's death in Paris explained
Daily trivia quiz: February 10
Radio station's divorce promo 'cowardly'
Should Valentine's Day cost you?
Helmet law halves cyclist numbers
All Blacks stars of the show at Halberg Awards
50c an hour increase triggers outrage
Do you think politicians spend too much on travel?
Newest First
Oldest First


i think it should be lifted, because some families would like to acheive gender balance. we have 3boys, 1 girls, i would love to give her a little sister. but cant because of the stupid ban, am i meant to risk getting more boys with autism, i already have two! come one. be fair! from one very upset mummy.