High cost for drug testing beneficiaries: Health ministry

DANYA LEVY
Last updated 08:46 17/08/2012
Helen Kelly
MAARTEN HOLL/Dominion Post
HELEN KELLY: Many people used marijuana occasionally and weren't impaired for work.
Opinion poll

Do you agree with drug testing beneficiaries?

Yes

No

Vote Result

Relevant offers

Politics

Meat explanation not adding up: Labour Trans-Pacific Partnership deal unlikely this year PPTA outs charter school hopefuls McCully meets with US Secretary of State Greens contest Ikaroa Rawhiti by-election MP tweeting - or napping - during taxing talk Clause denying legal action 'necessary' - PM Govt dumped departure tax plan Give breastfeeding mums a better go: MP NZ-US meetings hit the limelight

The Council of Trade Unions says drug testing people on welfare is no more than beneficiary bashing after revelations Ministry of Health warned the Government its policy will cost twice as much as it saves.

President Helen Kelly said a memo obtained by the CTU shows the policy is a $14 million "waste of money". The Government could save up to $6m and was spending $1.9m on drug rehabilitation.

However, the ministry had warned more money would have to be spend on rehabilitation because recreational users could claim they were drug addicts to avoid losing 13 weeks of their benefits, she said.

"What the Ministry of Health is saying is that suddenly everyone will say they've got a problem because people can't afford to lose their benefits. They will fill up every rehabilitation programme in New Zealand."

Many people used marijuana occasionally and weren't impaired for work, Kelly said.

"These people don't have a drug addiction so it's a moral issue about crime rather than a workplace issue."

Marijuana was very much a working class drug, she said.

"Working class people are being penalised for what is a low level drug-taking because it has a legacy effect in your blood.

'Hard drugs don't show up because they go through your system very quickly.

"So they could be a recreational marijuana user who have used it once and two weeks later (fail a test). Where as you could be a heavy meth(amphetamine) user and not test (positive)."

The CTU didn't support people turning up for work under the influence of drugs but supported testing where employers believed workers were impaired, Kelly said.

"This sort of random drug testing is an absolute waste of money. This is a nonsense."

About 180 KiwiRail workers were about to lose their jobs, at a time when rail needed more Government investment, she said. The $14m could keep those 180 workers employed.

Social Development Minister Paula Bennett said today the difference between a recreational drug user and a drug addict was a difficult distinction.

"That is challenging and something we are going to have to work through," she told Radio New Zealand.

The ministry had been helpful in highlighting the challenges of the policy, Bennett said.

"We haven't implemented the policy yet. The policy and it's detail will be coming out in due course and then at that point the public can make their judgement on whether they think we've got it right.

Ad Feedback

"This is about us working through the detail. It's seldom that you have a policy that is nice, and doesn't have it's challenges and is simple."

There were potentially thousands of recreational users who were unable to work because of their drug taking, she said.

- © Fairfax NZ News

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should Christchurch council partially sell assets to pay for 'nice to haves' in the rebuild?

Yes - NZ taxpayers are paying enough as it is

Yes - the focus should be on building a great city

No - keep the assets and use rates rises

No - NZ taxpayers should fund this

Perhaps use a mix of partial asset sales and rates rises

Vote Result

Related story: Asset sales could help pay for rebuild - Key

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

First Reading blog pointer small

First Reading: Vernon Small on politics

Backtracks on climate change cause little heat