Minister unimpressed by $200K conference

Last updated 18:51 09/12/2008

Relevant offers

Politics

MMP review may slam door on MPs PM backs plane flu scare response Ex-MP 'ashamed' of his drink-driving Voting on New Zealand's electoral system 'Mondayising' could cost $200m Radical trial system shake-up proposed What should the MMP threshold be? Today In Politics: Tuesday, February 14 Old dog won't let go of the bone Mana activist on mission to Antarctica

The Families Commission and its new minister, Paula Bennett, have got off to a bad start after she discovered plans for a $200,000 conference in a briefing paper.

Today the commission's briefing to Ms Bennett, Social Development Minister, was released.

It discussed plans for a summit, budgeted for $200,000, to be held in Auckland in February bringing together 150 "leaders and decision makers".

The commission said tonight it had cancelled the summit after failing to gain more sponsorship which it had hoped would reduce its own costs.

"It is clear the summit is not the most appropriate way to proceed at this point," the commission said.

"The commission has therefore cancelled its plans for the summit but remains committed to ensuring there is a whole-of-society response to the economic situation that ensures the impact on families is kept to a minimum."

NZPA spoke to Ms Bennett before the commission issued its statement, and she was unimpressed with the plans which were revealed in the briefing papers.

New Zealand Post Group chief executive John Allen was named as the keynote speaker and business journalist Rod Oram the facilitator.

Among attendees expected were The Warehouse founder Stephen Tindall, Principal Family Court Judge Peter Boshier, public sector chief executives, sector and business groups and unions.

"I was quite surprised to be going through my BIMs (Briefing to Incoming Minister papers) and come across this conference, summit as they are calling it, for $200k. It's just a lot of money," she said.

"It's not where I think the focus needs to be at the moment."

She raised concerns with the commission and talked about the National Government's focus on tough economic times.

"I am quite concerned about families moving forward and what that (tough economic times) means for them, and I would have thought that should be the focus for the Families Commission at this time."

She encouraged the organisation to reconsider.

"They told me they see it as important and it's part of their programme and they don't seem keen to drop it.

"The reality is that, although I am the one that stands up in the House and speaks for the Families Commission and their expenditure, it seems they have a level of autonomy which I respect.

"I just would have thought they would have been looking at their priorities in light of a new government."

The Families Commission was a United Future Party initiative. Its establishment was a key condition of the minor party's support agreement with the Labour Government after the 2002 election.

Ad Feedback

National previously pledged to scrap it but has agreed to maintain it although "administrative efficiencies" would be sought between the commission and the Office of the Children's Commissioner.

- NZPA

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should Deaf MP Mojo Mathers pay for her own help to participate in Parliamentary debates?

Yes

No

Vote Result

Related story: Speaker hits back in technology row

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Pagani blog pointer small

John Pagani - Left leaning

Don't set Treaty back 25 years

David Farrar blog pointer small

By the Numbers: David Farrar watches the polls

What should the MMP threshold be?

The Whip blog pointer small

Andrea Vance and John Hartevelt on politics

What to do with the Crafar Farms?