Axing ECan election 'undemocratic'

RACHEL YOUNG
Last updated 05:00 09/11/2012

Relevant offers

Politics

The Government has re-written the rules of the accommodation supplement, creating some big winners The budget as seen from the south Budget 2017: Government answers schools' pleas with $60.5 million boost Budget bolsters welfare, but what about housing? Max Rashbrooke: A Government trying to make up for past neglect Budget reveals plans for locks, lights for repeat burglary victims Budget boost for mental health may not be enough, campaigners say Budget 2017: Family income and tax package - by the numbers Mike Williams: Opportunity lost for some Budget big ideas First home buyers question how the Budget helps them

Axing Environment Canterbury elections until at least 2016 is a breach of the Government's commitment to democracy, New Zealand's Human Rights Commission says.

Chief human rights commissioner David Rutherford yesterday hit out at the Government for introducing the Environment Canterbury (Temporary Commissioners and Improved Water Management) Bill, during a Local Government and Environment Select Committee meeting.

The bill will allow Government-appointed commissioners to run the regional body until at least the 2016 elections.

"Our view continues to be that the undemocratic way in which the original legislation was introduced, and its continuance, is simply wrong from a human rights perspective."

In September, Local Government Minister David Carter and Environment Minister Amy Adams said ECan elections would not be held until 2016 at the earliest, despite an earlier Government promise to hold regional council elections next year.

Government-appointed commissioners have been in charge of ECan since democratically elected councillors were sacked in 2010.

Rutherford said the bill breached some of the international human rights commitments the Government had made.

His submission states: "The commission considers that no good reason has been provided for extending the present legislation. The lack of public consultation about content - or the continuing need for legislation - is an abuse of the democratic process and does not reflect the real needs of Cantabrians (and could even do real harm).

"In our view the present legislation has the potential to further exacerbate the resentment that has arisen in Canterbury as result of autocratic decision-making."

He said Cantabrians needed to be involved in decision-making to mitigate the sense of powerlessness that followed a natural disaster. "In a situation such as this where the local communities are already traumatised by measures introduced in response to the earthquakes, extending this legislation effectively perpetuates the problems . . . and reinforces the inability of those directly affected to contribute in a meaningful fashion to legislation that affects them personally."

The Labour MP for Wigram, Megan Woods, said Rutherford's submissions highlighted the "democratic and human rights abuses" in Canterbury.

"There is no justification for cancelling elections. As ratepayers, Canterbury residents deserve a say in who represents them and makes decisions on their behalf."

Environment Canterbury commissioners and Local Government Minister David Carter declined to comment last night.

Ad Feedback

The committee will hear further submissions on the bill in Christchurch on November 15.

The committee has received 91 submissions on the bill.

Representatives from the Human Rights Commission, Environment and Conservation Organisations of New Zealand and New Zealand Fish and Game Council spoke yesterday.

- The Press

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should the speed limit be raised to 110kmh on some roads?

Yes

No

Vote Result

Related story: 110kmh limit moves closer

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content