Dotcom can sue Government

KIRSTY JOHNSTON
Last updated 12:01 07/03/2013
Fairfax NZ

A Court of Appeal judgement has ruled that the Megaupload founder can sue the spying agency which illegally spied on him prior to his arrest last year.

Kim Dotcom
Reuters
MEGAMIND: Internet entrepreneur Kim Dotcom.

Relevant offers

Politics

Could Jacinda Ardern's star rise further on a Mt Albert by-election win? New 'swimmable' fresh water targets are also 100% pure politics New Government target to see 90 per cent of rivers and lakes 'swimmable' by 2040 Auckland central's new Labour candidate to take on Nikki Kaye Peter Dunne proposes Civil Defence merger with new fire service after recent problems Alison Franklin wants to give back to Tararua through new councillor role Stand-down for employers who exploit migrants not enough: unions Pattrick Smellie: Bill English struggles to offload a billion dollars On oldie but a goodie: Joyce is playing the election year tax-cut shuffle Labour leader Andrew Little's divide and conquer 'not kaupapa Maori'

The Government has lost its bid to keep its spy agency out of the Kim Dotcom legal battle, meaning it will have to appear in court and be sued alongside police.

However, a Court of Appeal judgment released today has overturned a decision that would have allowed Dotcom's lawyers to see all the information collected by the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) against him.

In its ruling the court also slammed the Crown for failing to follow proper procedure and has asked them to better co-operate with Dotcom's lawyers so the case can be determined as "expeditiously" as possible.

The judgment was released following an appeal by the attorney-general against a decision made by the chief High Court judge, Justice Helen Winkelmann, last year.

Winkelmann ruled the GCSB needed to be included in the Dotcom proceedings, and that details of the extent of the spying must be made available.

It was revealed the GCSB had been illegally spying on the Megaupload founder prior to his arrest on copyright infringement charges last year.

Dotcom decided to seek compensation for the breach in addition to his claim against police, who were found to have acted unlawfully during the raid on his Coatesville home.

The attorney-general did not believe the GCSB should be a party to the case. The Appeal Court did not agree and has ordered the two compensation claims to be joined at an April hearing.

Not all of the appeal decision went in Dotcom's favour, however.

The court also ruled that not all of the evidence gathered by the spies about Dotcom and his associate Bram van der Kolk has to be made available to his lawyers.

Previously, Winkelmann had ordered "discovery" of all documents related to the Dotcom operation, including anything shared with other intelligence agencies overseas. However today's Appeal Court ruling means that Dotcom's team are only allowed to know of the existence of the information and to who it was shown, but will not get to see the actual information collected.

Within the judgment, the appeal court judges expressed displeasure at the way the compensation case had been handled by the Crown.

"The dilemma that this court now faces should not have been allowed to develop," it said.

"The Crown should have ensured that the issues brought to this court were in a proper procedural form... especially as the police [claim] is the principal area of contention."

It also added an end comment saying: "We urge the parties to co-operate to ensure that the pleadings are brought into proper order and that the issues before the High Court are determined as expeditiously as possible."

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should the speed limit be raised to 110kmh on some roads?

Yes

No

Vote Result

Related story: 110kmh limit moves closer

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content