Call to look anew at rape 'consent'

ANDREA VANCE
Last updated 05:00 27/11/2013

Relevant offers

Politics

We run the ruler over the Government's family income package Budget 2017: Nine years of spending under National First home buyers question how the Budget helps them Colin Craig's tactics against Rachel MacGregor revealed 'It's not easy' says candidate who withdrew from election race in East Coast Bays Why 16-year-olds aren't ready to vote Former MP John Luxton: National could win fourth term but Winston holds balance of power Election 2017: Pollution and climate change will ravage NZ as long as politicians dodge big questions Labour and Greens split over Budget tax cuts despite joint 'fiscal responsibility' deal $1.6 billion Waterview Connection's mystery opening date a 'few weeks away'

The Government should take a fresh look at the definition of consent in rape cases in the wake of the Roast Busters sex scandal, Labour says.

Justice Minister Judith Collins yesterday confirmed amendments to make it less traumatic for sex attack victims to give evidence in court would be introduced early next year.

The changes include a requirement for a rape case defendant to give notice - before a trial begins - of intention to use evidence about a victim's sexual history.

Collins intends to amend the Evidence Act, saying it is too easy for the defendant to "ambush" a victim with details of their previous sexual experiences.

However, Labour's justice spokesman, Andrew Little, is calling for an amendment to the definition of consent in the Crimes Act, saying it is still, in part, based on the defendant's perception.

"If we defined ‘consent' in terms only of whether as a matter of fact it was given, we end up requiring the defendant to give evidence about consent and subject them to cross examination, rather than just the victim," he said.

Currently the law requires two things to prove sexual violation - that the accused did not have the person's consent, and did not believe on reasonable grounds that the person was consenting.

Little also wants judges to control the cross-examination of the victim.

Green MP Jan Logie said the law changes were "baby steps".

"The reforms that she has announced, while a positive step, are not going to achieve the change that New Zealanders are crying out for and would not, for example, have made prosecuting the so-called Roast Busters group any more likely," she said.

The changes are based on recommendations from the Law Commission, delivered in March.

The public began demanding changes to the justice system in the wake of the Roast Busters scandal, in which victims were reluctant to come forward.

The Roast Busters are a group of young West Auckland men who claim to have had group sex with drunk, underage girls.

Collins said child witnesses would also give their testimony to a court through a video of their police interview. If this was not possible, they could do so by CCTV or from behind a screen.

Ad Feedback

- Fairfax Media

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should the speed limit be raised to 110kmh on some roads?

Yes

No

Vote Result

Related story: 110kmh limit moves closer

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content