Child protection measure shelved

Last updated 10:52 05/03/2014

Relevant offers

Politics

Reserve Bank mandate no longer cutting it - Labour Stacey Kirk: Is New Zealand's mental health service doing more harm than good? Legal cannabis could collect $150 million a year but Bill English isn't pursuing it Tracy Watkins: Helen Clark's down but not out in the race to lead the UN Foreign Minister Murray McCully contracted Zika Veteran Taranaki regional councillor will not contest seat in upcoming election PM's department warned of Chinese trade threats, but didn't brief him Failed leadership coup exposes more 'toxic culture' at Wellington City Council Patrick Gower admits man crush on Donald Trump's son in weird live video from RNC Helen Kelly: 'My back is broken and I only have months to live but I'm pain free'

The Government has dumped plans to introduce restraining orders that would have kept suspected child abusers away from children for up to 10 years.

Social Development Minister Paula Bennett announced this morning that Child Harm Prevention orders were "on hold."

As part of the Vulnerable Children Bill the orders would have allowed High Court and District Court judges to impose the civil orders on people tried for offences like incest, grooming or violation, even if they aren't convicted.

They would have kept suspected abusers away from parks, pools, working with children and even sitting next to a child on a bus.

But Opposition parties and advocacy groups like Every Child Counts and Rethinking Crime and Punishment questioned the legality of slapping orders on suspected abusers.

A regulatory impact statement had warned the legislation would be seen by many as "punitive and contrary to the presumption of innocence, and therefore as an infringement of fundamental rights".

However, the Government withheld large chunks of the report, released last year.

"We've carefully considered submissions to the select committee on these orders," Bennett said.

"Given the range of other protective measures the Government is introducing, we believe we will achieve improved protection of children without these orders.

"I am reserving the right to revisit the need for such orders in the future. They're just off the table for now."

The minister said enhanced extended supervision orders (ESOs), public protection orders, police safety orders and GPS tracking for child sex offenders were among measures being introduced to protect children from abuse.

The Greens welcomed the decision to remove the orders from the legislation, saying they were an "untested experiment."

“It is great that the Social Development Minister has listened to the concerns raised about the orders and we hope she will be open to changing other aspects of the Bill if experts recommend that they’re also not in the best interests of children,” Green Party Co-leader Metiria Turei said.

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should the speed limit be raised to 110kmh on some roads?

Yes

No

Vote Result

Related story: 110kmh limit moves closer

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content