Labour's education plan 'smart'

TRACY WATKINS
Last updated 16:03 06/07/2014

Relevant offers

Opinion

Tracy Watkins: Lessons from Brexit for New Zealand David v Jacinda: 'Legislation is a lottery' Britain valued trade alliance of EU, but not the political alliance Andrew Gunn: Ask an expert with the PM of a small Pacific country David Slack: 'Greed, and hair gel, is good' Top diplomat: Serious questions to be answered about the government's misuse of power Key sprang Iraq troop decision on the public dodging awkward debate Chris Trotter: The middle class have become selfish survivalists Policy 'plagiarism' irritates Winston Peters as he protects his brand Stacey Kirk: A cold week in politics as Government fuels fires with ice

Labour's plan to reduce class sizes may not be a game changer - but it is smart.

OPINION: David Cunliffe has cleverly targeted an area that was National's Achilles heel thanks to Education Minister Hekia Parata's aborted - and controversial -  plan to pay for teacher training by increasing class sizes.

This is an issue that goes to the heart of parents concerns about the school system; most would crawl over hot coals to get their kid into a class where the teacher has the time to give them individual attention - and that means smaller classrooms, not bigger ones.

Labour says the cost will be covered by scrapping National's fund for performance pay for teachers and executive principles. 

Apparently this announcement was supposed to be the warm-up act to Cunliffe's announcement yesterday to make personal computers available to every child. The class sizes announcement was going to be Saturday and the digital devices initiative today. But the order was shifted around thanks to the iPad announcement being leaked to Fairfax. It is ironic then that today's announcement on class sizes is likely to have much greater cut through.

So whether by accident or design, Labour hit the right note today.


Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content