A lesson in how to consult electors

ABOUT THE HOUSE - JANE CLIFTON
Last updated 05:00 27/09/2012

Relevant offers

Opinion

Why I left the New Zealand left Chris Trotter: Steven Joyce's Budget an attempt to buy off middle-class consciences Voting is important, but is it more important than other civil rights? Election 2017: When the money isn't enough - time for politicians to brush up their bedside manner Short-term Budget to capture election-year votes Stacey Kirk: Steven Joyce slams cash-laden briefcase on table - no room for a sly envelope Budget 2017 -- what the Clutha-Southland candidates say Election 2017: Blood in the political waters opens the door for an upset Here are the numbers, what about the vision Editorial: How do we benefit from overseas investment?

In the dictionary, the word “consultation” is defined as the act of asking other parties what they think.

OPINION: In politics, it is taken to mean a purely ornamental conversation governments have with the people affected by an unpopular proposal before they go ahead and do it to them anyway.

Education Minister Hekia Parata has a third definition: an ornamental conversation you have with people after you've all but done it to them, as she showed responding in Parliament yesterday to questions about the controversial Canterbury school closures and mergers.

Labour's Chris Hipkins wanted to know whom she had consulted before announcing the changes, since it seemed clear she had not consulted the schools or their boards before the announcement.

Ms Parata launched into an explanation about working through “phases of consultation” that were “becoming ever finer-grained”. They had started “at very high levels”, leading to submissions, and then to proposals.

Mr Hipkins complained, and Speaker Lockwood Smith agreed, that she hadn't told the House who had been consulted.

Ms Parata was indignant. “The point is that the consultations taking place, as they are quoted in the [Christchurch Renewal] document, relate to the particular consultations that took place . . .

“We drew up a document that went to the kinds of facilities and options that would be desirable.”

Dr Smith said she still had to say who had been consulted.

“Drawing from the information that arose through . . . submissions we received, as a context, drawing from the data . . . [of] school assessments and drawing from ministry advice, these next set of proposals have been developed for consultation,” she waffled.

Mr Hipkins looked ready to dance a jig, so backhandedly delighted was he with the blatancy of his quarry's evasion.

After a further nudge from Dr Smith, she agreed, in petulant tones, to construe the question “pedantically”!

“I consulted the submissions that had been submitted. I consulted with ministry staff who in turn had consulted with individuals across the . . . district,” she recited primly.

Mr Hipkins looked especially pleased with the idea of consultations with submitted submissions. Deciding to spell out his concern in the simplest possible terms, he asked whether there would now be sufficient time for the schools, parents, pupils, teachers and local communities to be consulted.

“The specifics of the details of consultation under the formal process will be advised to schools, which should be the first to know, and then I will take feedback from them,” Ms Parata said.

Ad Feedback

At that point, Mr Hipkins' threshold for impromptu reruns of dialogue from Yes, Minister was exhausted, and he gave up.

- The Dominion Post

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content