Stacey Kirk: Not the 'benign strategic environment' of old, the Defence Force targets sights closer to home
OPINION: Remember the time Helen Clark said New Zealand existed in a "benign strategic environment"?
A lot has changed since 2001.
The Government released the long-awaited Defence White Paper this week, and with it comes a renewed focus on New Zealand's own back yard.
It's not quite the shopping list of advanced warfare gadgets the Australian one was, and for that we should be thankful.
* Defence White Paper: Government unveils $20b defence plan for new planes, boats and cyber security
* Antarctica NZ warns MPs - funding freeze cannot continue
* Defence Force could spend $600m on two new planes
* Did cyclone Pam make a case for C17s?
* More troops needed but cash is short
* US satellite partnership for defence force
Thankful for a few reasons; things may be less benign than they were 15 years ago, but we're not in the same position as Australia when it comes to protecting our borders. Nor have we (so far) engaged in openly aggressive discussions with any of our neighbours.
And while there is a considerable lack of detail about what a colossal $20 billion spend is going to buy us, it's preferable to the Australian example, which has that Government already embroiled in controversy over the quality of deals entered into to spend billions of dollars on submarines.
One would hope that would see our procurement process be placed under far more scrutiny.
Despite its lack of technical detail however, the White Paper provides some interesting geo-political insights into where the Government sees its biggest threats.
Where the 2010 White Paper was panned as a failure to protect New Zealand's exclusive economic zone, the latest dossier places New Zealand's strategic interests squarely in protecting the four million square kilometres of its surrounding waters.
It's about illegal encroachment into our fisheries - a serious economic threat, more than any perceived military threat. However, in the case of the South China Sea it's clear the two are intertwined.
Defence White Papers aren't typically critical of other countries - like any public-record document.
What was perhaps more telling was John Key's diplomatic line of "not choosing a side", compared with Gerry Brownlee's bullish military-man persona, playing up the case for "freedom of navigation" through the contested shipping route, during the press conference to launch the white paper.
Choosing a side however, between China and the US, may be exactly where China is hoping to nudge us.
Finally, the white paper made much hype of the need for capability to protect New Zealand's interests in the Southern Ocean and Antarctica.
The number of national camps on the icy continent is increasing, and "while scientific research is a key focus for most countries, the motivations of others may be less clear".
Intrinsic to exercising clout in protecting that region, is our ability to carry out meaningful scientific work and logistics support. Hence the need for a new ice-strengthened Offshore Patrol Vessel and an upgrade to the aging Air Force Hercules and 757s.
So benign? Not anymore.
As resources come under strain, the world is already turning its gaze southward - upgrading New Zealand's strategic environment to "challenged".
- Sunday Star Times