Editorial: Exposing the many colours of our prejudices - again

Last updated 12:30 07/08/2010

Related Links

Matt Lawrey: Level of bigotry that can only depress Matt Lawrey: Kia ora to an enlightened attitude towards te reo

Relevant offers

Editorial

Editorial: Debate a good thing; idiocy unwelcome Editorial: Sensible outcome to cycling death case Editorial: Key Government relationship put to the test Editorial: Act of God no excuse Editorial: Clear path for Nelson Tasman Editorial: Man with a mission Editorial: Clash of the festivals Editorial: Running tomorrow's schools today Editorial: Peanuts, monkeys, heard it before Editorial: Robbing our 'oldies' of their money and their dignity

OPINION: The good, the bad and the ugly side of race relations in Aotearoa, 2010, have been back in the headlines this week.

The ugly came quick and fast in online comments on the Mail's website, responding to a far-from-strident offering by columnist Matt Lawrey published in last weekend's feature section.

The volume of comments – 66 at the last count – illustrated the sensitivity that remains attached to anything related to the "race" issue, as well as the growing popularity of the online soapbox.

The latter has become the talkback radio of the internet world and, while far greater comment counts are achieved on some closed, national, community websites – popular threads on the NZ Dating messageboards, for example, can reach their 121-post limits within hours – there is a significant credibility gap between those venues and those attached to recognised newspapers' sites.

This does not necessarily make the views expressed on them any more coherent or well-reasoned. Unfortunately, questions around race tend to bring out the worst in some people who seem to take great delight in exposing their ignorance to a wide audience (the Mail website has been clocking weekly "hits" of between 170,000 - 200,000-plus in recent months).

Though freedom of expression is a precious gift that many lives have been and continue to be lost fighting for, it is often abused or sadly under-valued. This is mostly true – and far from unexpected – of the anonymous and bigoted from either side of the debate, but can sometimes apply to those from positions of authority. The bad, then, of our opening sentence can be applied to comments by Maori Party MP Hone Harawira.

What started as a background article on his political rehabilitation after months in the "dogbox" over ill-considered comments in a leaked email last year turned into yet another red mark on the outspoken politician's record. He would, he said, be uncomfortable if one of his children brought home a Pakeha for a partner. In explanation, he admitted this probably showed that he was prejudiced, " just like every other New Zealander".

With respect, that's rubbish – we'd choose a stronger term if our our freedom of expression were not somewhat restricted – stupid, damaging and wrong. Pressed on his position, Mr Harawira declared, "Like all Pakehas would be happy with their daughters coming home with a Maori boy? And the answer is no they wouldn't. That's just the reality of the world we live in."

Ad Feedback

The reality of the New Zealand that most of us live in is that "cross-cultural" marriages and partnerships have been quietly happening for 200 years – including within Mr Harawira's own whanau. If he really cannot stand all things Pakeha, then how in all conscience can he continue to keep his snout in the public trough?

The good, in terms of community leadership, comes from Nelson's Mike Elkington and his latest project – to get 4000 or more people to Tahunanui Beach on September 11 to take part in a world record haka. Trite tokenism? Exploitation of Maoritanga? Not a bar of it.

The event offers a refreshing opportunity for Nelsonians – of any shape, size or colour – to show that those who cannot see beyond the dim and narrow confines of their own prejudices are a small and shrinking, sad and miserable minority. The haka of today has evolved into a unifying symbol of multicultural nationhood. If once-were redneck Nelson happened to hold the record for participation, that would surely say something about how far the province and nation have come – regardless of what Mr Harawira and a few online stirrers might believe.

- © Fairfax NZ News

25 comments
Post a comment
nina   #25   02:54 pm Aug 12 2010

Daddio #24 I was in a church last week where most of those things were done, ha ha! And those people (all pakeha) didn't see them as 'war dance' moves. Have you ever explored the lyrics of a haka to work out what it is really about???

Daddio   #24   01:51 pm Aug 12 2010

#23 John,Slapping the body,rolling the eyes,stamping the feet and poking the tongue out are all war dance moves---as I'm sure you know.

John McDonald   #23   08:41 pm Aug 11 2010

Daddio #22 There are haka for welcome, haka for farewells, haka for challenge, haka for reconciliation, haka for fun and haka for ceremony. Haka are seldom "war dance". The Ka mate haka is a celebration of life and of cheating death. Hardly "crap".

The recent national secondary schools kapa haka competition was an amazing event with young kiwis from every ethnic background taking part. Haka are something we NZers can justifiably be very proud of - even those of us who are pakeha.

Daddio   #22   01:15 pm Aug 11 2010

I watched the Haka go from a half acted little dance tacked on to the front of a Rugby game to now become the cut and paste culture Kiwis feel they need to show the world we are one---what crap---I cannot number the ammount of foreigners that have asked me if we do the Haka to everything---it's way to over used and makes us look culturely deprived----it's a war dance for Petes sake---no culture should ever use any such thing as the corner stone of Nationhood---Grow up New Zealand---we have obligations to the peace of the world, not to show the world our love of conflict.

James John   #21   01:48 pm Aug 09 2010

@ Rangi 17 - heck of a lot of big words there bro. if hone did re-phrase his question like you suggest, then we wouldn't be here having this debate. you gotta realise cuzzy that most of the idiot drama queens that jump on the media-sensationalised spoon-fed bandwagon are just that, idiot drama queens. and unfortunately, for bros like yourself who've obviously read a book or two, you're speaking from the perspective of a minority group. the majority are dumb soap-op watching sheep... so if you want uptake, dumb down the words and ham up the drama. headings like "racist <insert colour> mo-fos" should get the ball rolling

TP   #20   12:50 pm Aug 09 2010

tickedyboo #18

"the truth is that much of maori culture is bad i.e. the family violence, booze and drugs, crime, dole bludging etc."

You, sir, are a moron, if you believe these are the result of Maori culture.

If you stepped back and actually used your brain, it is pretty easy to see the linkages between low income socio-economic groups and your aforementioned conditions. It just so happens that Maori are overrepresented in these groups, which is a direct result of societal failings - and also by design (see: pepperpotting, two-tiered education system...). Don't believe me? Look at indigenous cultures all around the world - Aboriginal, Native American, Inuit, Tlingkit, Hawaiian, Ainu... Is it coincidence that all these first nations groups share those afflictions? Or is it repeated failings of the Society they live in?

Fyodor Dostoyevsky once wrote "The degree of civilization in a society can be judged by entering its prisons" - thus we see that your ailments are the failings of a society, not of a subgroup thereof.

Now I can imagine your response will ring to the sound of "Maori not taking responsibility, victim mentality..." or some such, and to that I pose to you - why is Society not taking responsibility? So the middle and upper classes can point their fingers and say "there are the bad guys"?

Let's hear the outraged responses... game on

nina   #19   12:18 pm Aug 09 2010

tickedyboo #18 Te Reo is of value because it is unique in the same way that native flora and fauna are of value - particularly those that are endangered. Add to that the place Te Reo has in shaping our identity and we are talking about a national treasure. No, you don't have to learn it. It is not forced on anyone in NZ. It is only english that is and has been forced on people.

tickedyboo   #18   11:49 am Aug 09 2010

John McDonald #15

I do not think it is a loss to not speak Maori. We should be taught a useful language in schools, one that can be used worldwide. What is the point in learning maori?

It is not lazy to be uninterested in a culture that is shoved down our throats, when the truth is that much of maori culture is bad i.e. the family violence, booze and drugs, crime, dole bludging etc.

I admit to being racist against the type of people listed above, whatever colour they are.

Rangi   #17   11:44 am Aug 09 2010

If you're looking for reasons to limit freedom of expression, many good examples can be found in these posts. Racism in NZ is very sophisticated, it takes a brave / stupid person to assume their culture has sway over another. As we see in the Tuhoe case, independence from the Crown, at this time, is not an option. This is a shame, I would have liked to see how Tuhoe would get on as a State Nation. I'm sure a world-leading, amicable solution could have been reached but JK lost courage.

Reading between the lines, I think what Hone meant was "who is going to maintain the authenticity of my culture?" Had he put his concerns in that form, it would have been more compelling arguement & not had such heated responses. Authenticity is important, its a shame it is not regarded as such by many (eg Tahunanui Haka).

The prevailing theme in race relations is refinement of communication. Hone appears to be incapable of this, but he is one of many. Its when the progress of a culture is met with aggressive mediocrity I find deplorable. One only has to take a rudimentary course in our history to see where NZ could do better in this area.

cecelia   #16   11:23 am Aug 09 2010

Well I am Maori - and like most of my whanau (those that havent already left the country) I am too busy raising my daughter, focussing on my career, and frankly having a life to bother with either Maori or Pakeha issues. Or those that spout on about them.

NZers (both Maori and Pakeha) need to travel more..this small town mentality in NZ is incredibly boring and often embarrasing. My daughter leaves for uni next year - I leave for the rest of the world soon after.


Show 1-15 of 25 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content