Austen, zombies and monsters

Last updated 09:33 13/08/2009
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies book
AP
SEXING-UP THE CLASSICS: Adding gore to classic works of literature is paying dividends for publishers.

Relevant offers

It is a truth universally acknowledged that a Jane Austen novel in possession of added gore will be a surefire best-seller.

That's the conclusion reached by publishers since the success of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, an unlikely literary sensation created by adding dollops of "ultraviolent zombie mayhem" to Austen's classic love story.

Zombies - billed as 85 percent Austen's original text and 15 percent brand-new blood and guts - has become a best-seller since it was published earlier this year, with 750,000 copies in print. There's a movie in the works. And it has spawned a monster - or, more accurately, a slew of literary monster mash-ups.

Next month, Zombies publisher Quirk Books is releasing Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters, which adds giant lobsters and rampaging octopi to Austen's love story.

Out this week from another publisher is Mr. Darcy, Vampyre, a supernatural sequel which portrays the aloof hero of Pride and Prejudice as an undead bloodsucker. Later this year comes Jane Bites Back, in which the author herself develops a taste for blood.

Even Austen purists admit a grudging admiration for the Zombies concept.

"In publishing terms, it's brilliant," said Claire Harman, a Columbia University professor and author of Jane's Fame: How Jane Austen Conquered the World.

"Why did I spend three years writing a critical book on Austen? Why didn't I just think of that?"

Quirk Books editorial director Jason Rekulak said he was inspired by the internet-unleashed wave of "creative copyright infringement" - musical and video mash-ups that mangle styles and genres for comic or dramatic effect.

He made a list of classic books whose copyrights have lapsed and were ripe for pillage, from Moby Dick to Great Expectations.

"Then I made a list of things that might enhance these novels - robots, ninjas, zombies," Rekulak said. "As soon as I drew a line between 'Pride and Prejudice' and zombies, I knew I had a great title."

The irresistible title is key to the success of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. The book itself keeps most of Austen's story - girl meets boy, girl hates boy, girl is won over by boy's good looks and large fortune - with added chunks of zombie violence by US writer Seth Grahame-Smith.

Zombies and its successors are the latest mutant offshoots of the unstoppable Austen industry.

The author wrote just six novels before she died at age 41 in 1817, but they have inspired endless spinoffs, from "chick-lit" novels like The Jane Austen Book Club to time-travelling TV series Lost in Austen and Bollywood-tinged movie Bride and Prejudice.

Ad Feedback

There are books on everything from etiquette (Jane Austen's Guide to Good Manners) to gardening (In the Garden with Jane Austen), and a huge internet-based community of passionate Jane-philes.

It's a remarkable turnaround for a writer who achieved limited success in her lifetime and was largely forgotten after she died.

FEISTY HEROINES

Harman, who studied Austen's resurrection by a band of late 19th-Century admirers, said her global fame rests partly on the appeal of her elegant, witty books, with their blend of social commentary, feisty heroines and romantic happy endings.

"Because there are only six of them, (readers) want more and they will riff on the scenes she provided," Harman said. "People want to wallow. They want to get in that lovely warm bath and have a longer bath."

And partly, Harman said, it's good timing, "a kind of technological luck."

The emergence of the internet coincided with a wave of Austen adaptations, including the BBC's 1995 Pride and Prejudice and Ang Lee's adaptation of Sense and Sensibility the same year, that brought the writer new fans.

That doesn't explain the surprising affinity between Austen's Regency world, with its horse-drawn carriages, country-house balls and empire line dresses, and the supernatural.

"There's more overlap between the two worlds than I ever imagined," said Rekulak, who was startled to find a large number of Austen fans at Comic-Con, the San Diego conference devoted to all things science fiction and fantasy.

"It struck me that that kind of Regency romance is its own sort of fantasy," he said.

It's not so far-fetched to see echoes of handsome, brooding Mr. Darcy in the teen-heartthrob vampires of the Twilight books and movies or the TV series True Blood.

Amanda Grange, author of Sourcebooks' Mr Darcy, Vampyre, said she found it easy to add dark, Gothic overtones to the story of Darcy and Lizzy Bennet. Austen wrote against the backdrop of the Napoleonic wars, and in an era that produced Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and the first vampire stories.

Like many good publishing ideas, the trend could soon spiral out of control. Rekulak says he can't stop friends and family sending him ideas for more books - he has a list of more than 200 titles, from A Farewell to Arms and Legs to The Brothers Kara-zombie.

The coming months promise more in the same bloody vein from a variety of publishers, including Queen Victoria: Demon-Hunter and I am Scrooge: A Zombie Story for Christmas.

In the United States, where Quirk Books is based, all books copyrighted before 1923 are in the public domain. For other books, copyright generally expires some decades after the author's death, but this varies from country to country.

If nothing else, the trend proves the willingness of readers and writers to eliminate the gap between pop culture and what used to be known as high art.

Grange said she had the idea for her story years ago while watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer, the TV show about a suburban California student who battles demons.

"I just thought that if they ever did a Pride and Prejudice episode it would work really well," Grange said. "You could have Buffy as Lizzy and Angel as Darcy.

"People used to live in more compartmentalised worlds," she said. "Now we are exposed to all of it - we study the classics at school but then we go home and watch TV."

- AP

21 comments
Post a comment
Darryl   #21   01:12 pm Aug 31 2009

Haha, Will #14, you are so right. However I'm not sure anything could make Austin's vacuous, pointless drivel any better. My vote goes to: Sharks with frickin' laser beams.

Gravey   #20   05:24 pm Aug 27 2009

Not sure if I am grateful for the reviews or not. We bought it as soon as we saw it, but wifey has kept it for herself. Still - I never pay that much attention to what other people say, so am looking forward to reading it myself.

Note for Ingrid - LOTR is an English story. My mate Pete (pause for minor laughter here) just directed and produced the movie. Well, when I say "just" I mean it in terms of a masterpiece of cinema.

The reference to Buffy in terms of English classics is quite apt. The Buffy series is now a whole area of study of its own. Joss made not insubstantial changes to the English colloquialism through those series.

Tommy   #19   08:24 pm Aug 26 2009

It would have been much better if it had ninjas instead of zombies. Oh and pirates too!

ingrid   #18   04:47 pm Aug 19 2009

I agree with louise #6 if a fantatsic classic novel has to be filled with nonsence about zombies to make people read it maybe they should get some culture. Its the whole reason why it is a time less classic is because it was written so long ago but still has values to it today if you cant comprehend that without changing it you dont deserve to read it. What would kiwis say if lord of the rings or whale rider were changed for the worse to make people read it and for finacial gain?

Louisette   #17   12:10 pm Aug 17 2009

@ Miss_Madame_S #16

It's worth checking out if you have some time to kill. Don't expect it to be the best book you've ever read, but it is readable and that's an improvement on classic Austen.

Miss_Madame_S   #16   04:40 am Aug 17 2009

Lol Louisette, I can't stand chick-lit myself and Zombies would make this more readable for me too.

Kay   #15   05:25 pm Aug 15 2009

Sorry Will didn't like them. I first read "Pride and Prejudice" as a 13 year old girl. I really valued the satire and cyncism in the books about men, women and marriage as a career choice. It's a great book by itself.

I also love "Buffy the Vampire Slayer", and horror and fantasy fiction, but I'm not so sure about the combination. To do a parody of a book that is already a satire needs a very clever writer. Probably A Lee Martinez (author of books like "Gil's All Fright Diner" and "A Nameless Witch" could have done better with the humour, but maybe not with the English class satire.

It sounds like a book to borrow rathe than buy, so thanks for the reviews.

Will   #14   12:15 am Aug 15 2009

I have yet to reach the end of an Austen novel without wanting to beat myself with a railway sleeper, to be honest. I studied 2 of them at A level English Literature at school in the UK and detested them.

Her work is so awfully dull and tedious that I am amazed anyone enjoys it. The zombies must be great light relief.

jenny   #13   08:06 am Aug 14 2009

I bought it and thought it was okay. The zombie moments were amusing, but it wasn't fantastic. I'm still glad I have it - it's a bit of a conversation piece. I agree with lisa about the too many balls jokes.

bo   #12   07:08 pm Aug 13 2009

Owen wilson would make a good zombie in the film...and ben stiller could be the zombie's vomit


Show 1-11 of 21 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you sign in, you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions