Fancy dunny plan provides light relief
BY DAVE BURGESS
Relevant offers
The public has spoken - the $400,000 designer dunnies planned for Wellington's waterfront look like a fallopian tube, bulging eyes, or a bra discarded by pop star Madonna.
Wellington City Council wants to build the loos at Kumutoto Wharf, behind pub The Loaded Hog, as part of its draft waterfront development plan, which goes out for public comment this month.
But those enjoying the waterfront sun could barely wait to have their say, including Craig Simeon.
"Oh my God. It looks like something Madonna would have worn in the past ... It is just ugly. What are they supposed to be based on?"
He said the toilets reminded him of the new "rusty looking" Wellington airport terminal now being built, but which was likened by some to a pumpkin.
The toilet design was the winning entry from a competition held between 30 young designers from the Studio of Pacific Architecture.
Dan Scanlon thought the unisex loos would cost about $2.5 million to build and was surprised to learn they would cost about one-sixth of his estimate.
"They look like something internal, maybe a fallopian tube ... but if they are building something like a toilet they should look at functionality and spend the money on more important things."
Nicky Shields also thought the price tag was a bit steep for dunnies she said resembled a pair of binoculars.
"I think it is good to have public facilities and it is good to have the waterfront looking nice but it has to be within reason and $400,000 sounds quite a lot."
That view was backed by Catherine Robertshawe, who thought the toilets looked like the back end of a crayfish.
"It is important to have the dunnies but I don't think it is important to spend that much on them."
Anna Bowbyes said the ablution block looked like two big googly eyes and she thought it would be a good addition to the waterfront. "[But] at this time it is not that appropriate and they would have other projects to spend the money on."
A poll of Dominion Post readers on dompost.co.nz showed 31 per cent of respondents thought the fancy dunnies should be built. However, 46 per cent wanted the council to build bog-standard toilets to save money.
Two of the most recent toilet blocks built by the council at Mt Victoria and in Central Park cost just over $100,000 each.
The remaining 23 per cent of respondents thought the waterfront toilets were too expensive in the present economic climate.
The draft waterfront plan also includes a temporary ice skating rink for Queens Wharf and an indoor soccer venue between Te Papa and Waitangi Park.
A 40-berth campervan park at the bottom of Whitmore St is also proposed and could be open by December.
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
Can we not just have square toilet blocks!?? if they are going to spend so much money on public toilets then they should make them those self cleaning ones that cost 10 or 20cents to use! at least then the public toilets wont be absolutely DISGUSTING. what tourist wants to use a dirty smelly, pee floor toilet !? mind you most of the tourists just go to McDonalds to use the toilet.
This is quite a nice area of the wellington waterfront and it would be very short sighted to just dump an ugly sterile looking building in an area frequented by tourists and business executives traveling to the cbd.
@ K #1 - ditto that! Who cares what they look like when the insides are disgusting.
I imagine if one is really needing to go they will be happy that such an unmissable one exists. Nothing is more frustrating than trying to find a toilet when in the hour of need doe to it not being clearly signposted.
Public toilets should blend into the background. They should spend the extra money keeping them clean!
A burning issue: When coffins get too big
Hundreds ask that pig remains on police decal
Man fights police over 13m whale shark
Flushed necklace returned months later
Grade hacker gets probation, not A
Unplanned 9/11 analysis links noise, whale stress
US Customs dreading flower week
Thief goes straight after finding child porn
Stolen python gets its own back on thief
Runaway dog's 10-day island ordeal
Moustache film festival to be held in Maine
Tension high as lethal log pile cleared
Police name Hawke's Bay crash victim
'Trail blazer' Carmen farewelled in Auckland
Usshers make it his and hers at Coast to Coast
Victim was holding bat, says witness
Gardener's paradise planned for Chch
Danny Lee drops back to pack at Pebble Beach
Obama tries to defuse birth control fight
Police recapture Madonna stalker
Promoter dismisses bike helmet harm study
Will bill make food safer or be a form of control?
Quakes blow Wellington's benchmark
EU courts Kiwis for science grants
Tension high as lethal log pile cleared
Police name Hawke's Bay crash victim
Black Caps overcome spirited Zimbabwe in T20
Vatuvei magic gives Warriors win over Souths
'Trail blazer' Carmen farewelled in Auckland
Quakes blow Wellington's benchmark
Engineer's report prompts mall evacuation
Usshers make it his and hers at Coast to Coast
Deep south beats rest of nation in jobless
Farmer faces wait over 'useless' land
Stadium firm also designed CTV
Which word or phrase do you find most annoying?
Related story: 'Whatever' world's most annoying word: poll
Newest First
Oldest First
Striking design but seems a shame to be used as Toilets....asking for trouble / critisism really....could be used for something a bit more auspicious (and less likely to be vandalised)