Moon v Earth, a new collision theory

Last updated 10:02 06/08/2012
BIG BANG: A Nasa representation of the collision.

BIG BANG: A Nasa representation of the collision.

Relevant offers

Some 4.53 billion years ago, a Mars-sized impactor slammed into Earth, forming a young, molten moon. But was it a head-on collision or a glancing blow?

New computer simulations argue for the former, indicating that the impactor scored a direct hit, crashing into Earth at a steeper angle and with a higher velocity than previously thought.

The resulting smashup would have ejected far more Earth debris into space than other models have indicated, with much hotter temperatures.

And that would mean the moon formed from more Earth-like material than previously thought. The origin of the impactor itself remains an open question.

The slow impact velocity of previous models requires it to have originated from an orbit very near Earth, while the new model allows for an origin from more far-flung parts of the solar system, researchers report in an upcoming issue of Icarus.

Ad Feedback
Special offers
Opinion poll

Is our atmosphere heating up too fast?

No, it's all just part of the natural cycle.

Yes, we are burning fossil fuels at dangerous levels.

She'll be right.

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

In Our Nature blog

In Our Nature, with Nicola Toki

The magic of the Mackenzie