Dream over, says Gareth Morgan

BY JAMES WEIR
Last updated 05:00 02/06/2009
JOHN KIRK-ANDERSON/The Press
PLAN MAN: Fund manager and economist Gareth Morgan.

Relevant offers

National business

Made in NZ to win Chinese hearts Quake city assets set to be popular EU courts Kiwis for science grants ERA awards restructured employee $21,000 Government blamed for Psa entry Zespri deputy won't step aside Twisted Hop back up and running I Love Ugly clothing goes online Christmas contributes to flat December figures Holiday parks enjoy growth

The Government should dump the "white elephant" New Zealand Superannuation Fund and give about $3000 back to people through KiwiSaver, says fund manager and economist Gareth Morgan.

In the Budget last week, the Government suspended contributions to the Super Fund, also known as the Cullen Fund, which is worth about $12.5 billion. With falling revenues and rising government spending, the Government ditched contributions of about $2b a year to the fund for at least a decade.

Putting $12.5b from the Super Fund into KiwiSaver would effectively make KiwiSaver compulsory overnight, Dr Morgan said. The alternative would be to give the $12.5b back to people in tax cuts, though that may be too radical for the Government.

With a compulsory KiwiSaver scheme, the state-provided superannuation could be a "safety net" for those who need it, or for those who "did their dough" in a poor KiwiSaver fund.

"You need a last resort [pension]," Dr Morgan said.

John Key's Government also needed to lift the age of entitlement from 65 to about 70, he said, because of the rising costs of pensions for the baby-boom generation as it retires.

New Zealand was clinging to "the lie" that the pension could be maintained at 65 years.

That would leave the Government's accounts permanently in trouble and the state would have to scrape to pay the pensions, or face cutting other things such as health spending.

"It is a total illusion and John Key needs to show some leadership here," Dr Morgan said.

Australia is moving the pension age to 67 over 14 years, Britain is already at 68 and the US is 67.

"Political cowardice (or is that short-term pragmatism?) rather than any prescient appreciation of the future is why Mr Key has opted to dodge calling a spade a spade."

But last week Finance Minister Bill English said in the Budget that the suspension of contributions to the Super Fund would not affect entitlements to NZ Superannuation.

"The Government's commitment to maintaining these is absolute. NZ Super will continue to be paid at a minimum of 66 per cent of the average wage, from the age of 65," he said.

Dr Morgan said yesterday the NZ Super Fund had become a "white elephant" and should be put on the funeral pyre.

The aim of the NZ Super Fund was to cover or "pre-fund" about 14 per cent of the state pension costs of baby boomers in coming decades. The balance would come from taxpayers.

Ad Feedback

With a 10-year delay before contributions are expected to start again, Dr Morgan estimates 93 per cent of the pension costs will have to be covered by taxpayers.

"The dream is over, economic circumstances have rendered the Cullen Fund a white elephant," he said.

The fund should also be killed off because of Mr Key's suggestion that 40 per cent of the fund should be invested in New Zealand.

Former National leader Rob Muldoon ran a campaign featuring "dancing Cossacks", to put down Labour's idea in the 1970s of a big super fund distorting the local economy.

"Well, this time the Cossack is John Key. Muldoon would be turning in his grave," Dr Morgan said.

The Super Fund had also underperformed against its benchmarks "by a mile" in part because it held no cash going into the downturn, he said.

The Super Fund has received about $15.2b in contributions, but has been hammered by the global sharemarket collapse in the past year and is now worth about $12.5b. In the 10 months to April,it slumped almost 30 per cent.

The fund's annualised rate of return since it was set up is 3.26 per cent.

That is about half of the risk-free rate of return the fund aims to beat by at least 2.5 per cent over the long term.

KiwiSaver funds have been hit in the downturn too, but Dr Morgan argues they would do better because of a range of competitive funds.

With private accounts, people would take a much greater interest how much they had and would change fund managers if they did not perform.

While Dr Morgan runs a KiwiSaver fund and would potentially benefit from NZ Super Fund money, he said: "I still have to compete".

MORGAN'S RECIPE

Put $12.5 billion from NZ Superannuation Fund into KiwiSaver accounts. Equal to about $3000 each. Make KiwiSaver compulsory (Australia already has a compulsory super scheme with contributions of 9 per cent of salaries). Lift state superannuation age from 65 to 70 or so, over time.

Post your comment below.

- © Fairfax NZ News

49 comments
Post a comment
DW   #49   03:55 pm Jun 04 2009

Hey Kris totally agree. I'd add the scrounging useless turds who avoid paying their taxes and hide their dodgy dealings in trusts and shell companies that comment though.

kris charlton   #48   12:06 pm Jun 04 2009

Why give 3k to some people who have never worked in their entire lives, who have spent all their lives feeding off the state? Some monkey now wants to give these people 3k to blow and then its back to the state system to feed off it again when the money is gone! You must be mad, by all means hand money back to people but dont give it back to scrounging, useless turds who feed off the state

Peter   #47   11:37 am Jun 03 2009

Gareth Morgan a tall poppy? This guy is everywhere with an opinion about everything - when he popped up on tv with all the answers to global warming and thought I was going puke. He didn't sell Trademe, it wasn't even his idea - it was his son and wife with the initiative and he cashed in on it. Don't forget that the main reason that the world is in the state it is today is largely due to worshipping financial advisors that knew so much more than anyone else and turned out not to know anything.

People put Maddoff on a pedestal before he turned out to be a fraud, and he pulled off that ruse thanks to so many people NOT being critical, and assuming that he was so rich he wouldn't need the money himself. I'm not saying that Morgan is a fraud, but its incredible how many people have nothing else to say but 'oh you are so right Gareth'....his comments now are a contradiction to his support of Kiwisaver in the first place anyway.

Christine Rankin's Legs   #46   11:33 am Jun 03 2009

Nearly choked on my lightly buttered toast this morning when I heard Morgan being referred to as a "leading economist" by Hilary Barry on Radio Live....

Bryan   #45   06:59 am Jun 03 2009

For nearly 40 years we have not had a specific fund for reirement and we are still debating the pros and cons of it. We should and must save to fund the retirement of our seniors.

The main problem I have with it is that if last year the fund lost 4 billion dollars and most of it went overseas into the so called markets wouldnt it have been better invested in NZ?

Zyan   #44   12:12 am Jun 03 2009

Suckling the nanny is the norm here in Kiwiland. Bred into a system of social welfare webs and locked into a lifelong welfare dependency are twin evils in Aotearoa. Every Tom, Dick and Harry has an opinion on everything and whn it comes to taking personal responsibilityf or looking after oneself, no one wants to do it and our jelly politicians are no better. Our MPs argue, talka nd talk endlessly and nothing is done. The Pension system is a leaky boat that is destined to plumb the bottom of the ocean. It is not a matter of, rather it is matter of when! Come on, John Key, have the courage and ball to reduce Pension payout so the system is sustainable. He won't have the key to success.

Alan S   #43   10:57 pm Jun 02 2009

The comments present a microcosm of Kiwi thought process: those that hack at tall poppies as a default response; those who can think; and those who have no idea.

Rob Woolley   #42   10:49 pm Jun 02 2009

Has Gareth Morgan ever said anything positive?, ever? Doom, doom and more doom. I am no expert in economics but it amazes me how he is against everything and for nothing, nothing except what he wants to happens that is and yes he has something to gain by this change. Just why is he given all the publicity he is given?

Simon   #41   08:48 pm Jun 02 2009

Which of you morons expect the government to provide for you in retirement anyway, regardless of age?

darn tootin!   #40   08:37 pm Jun 02 2009

@ Rangi 32 + BK 35...

I am with you!! my parents have worked extremmely hard all their lives bringing up 5 kids often working 12-14 hour days and doing manual labour. They definitly deserve to retire in 8 and 13years!!

I have at least 40years until I get to see my pension so why must I save now because the government says I can't do it on my own?! I pay enough taxes already. I don't want to see my money forcably moved into the Governments saving scheme when I already save 50% alone which I can then use as I choose.


Show 1-39 of 49 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content