EQC quake insurance shortfall doubles

MARTA STEEMAN
Last updated 05:00 10/11/2012

Relevant offers

National business

$120 to dump rubbish on the side of the road: Taranaki woman warns of courier company carrying out illegal dumping Auckland law firm warning Canterbury homeowners of shoddy steel Anticipation builds over Cobb and Co's possible return to Palmerston North Wait for legal action for South Canterbury Finance investors who lost millions could be over Hamilton ram raids plaguing city Quake demolition creates empty lot eyesore, business association says 23 complaints about child photography business shamed for Northland privacy breach Auckland hair salon owner penalised $8000 by Employment Relations Authority for unjustified text message firing Entries well up for new Kathmandu Coast to Coast event Million-dollar Upper Hutt manor Beechdale goes on market

The Earthquake Commission will be about $1.6 billion short for Canterbury earthquake claims, which the Government will stump up for.

That is the latest firm figure in EQC's annual report released yesterday, and a lot more than the Government estimated more than a year ago when it said EQC could be short by $800 million. But Finance Minister Bill English said in April the Government's guarantee to EQC could be "a few billion".

In EQC's annual report to June it confirms EQC's total liabilities are about $12.5b.

About $2.8b was paid out in the year to June 2012, and $1.2b the year before, so about $8.6b of claims remain to be settled.

The $8.6b was covered by reinsurance, cash and investments but EQC would be short by $1.6b which would be covered by the Government guarantee, the report said.

The total cost of insurance claims for the Canterbury earthquakes was estimated at $30b, the report said, quoting the Reserve Bank.

EQC chairman Michael Wintringham suggests in the report that insurers are shifting costs to the Crown.

Wintringham says that because of the huge scale of the earthquakes disaster and the costs to the Government and private insurers "there is an incentive for insurers to reduce their own liabilities by shifting costs to the Crown or to other parties".

Wintringham says the EQC Act needs review. At present the Government is considering the terms of reference of the review.

The Canterbury earthquakes had provided "a reality check" on the workability of the 20-year-old law.

The EQC Act did not have provisions that assumed cover for a series of earthquakes. The provisions assumed a single big event.

Nor did the act have provisions that covered the increased susceptibility of land to liquefaction.

A big part of EQC's efforts in settling claims had been in apportioning the amount of damage between earthquakes and aftershocks and in geotechnical assessments of land.

By the end of June EQC had repaired about 18,000 properties with about 80,000 to go.

EQC Expenditure

That included: $69 million claims assessment fees.

$37.5m for call centres and claims management by a third party.

$21.3m for claims administrators and contractors.

$23.2 for employee pay and benefits.

$41m for engineers and consultants.

$64m for project managers and infrastructure.

$23m for travel and accommodation.

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content