Lack of records foil receiver

HAMISH RUTHERFORD
Last updated 05:00 13/11/2012

Relevant offers

National business

Bespoke jewellery company The Rolling Mill shines in Aro Valley Chart of the day: What's the lowest paid industry in NZ? Rob Stock: E-bikes now better, leaner, faster Sudden leap in NZ credit scores, but we're no better with money Automated odds and more betting options a win-win, says TAB boss Garden of the week: Tamahere topiary It's elementary, Dr Watson - just follow the lead of the Audi SQ7 Farmer gets frank in job advert for stock man: 'Can be a smoker - but won't have the time' Christchurch's terraced homes struggling to sell as housing market levels Cruise ship passenger levy of $5 proposed to help build Akaroa Health Hub

Efforts to clarify the financial position of Ross Asset Management are being frustrated by a lack of records for its overseas investments.

The Wellington-based company was placed in receivership last week after a raid by the Financial Markets Authority on its offices on The Terrace on November 2. Its principal, David Ross, is in hospital and has been unable to instruct his lawyers.

Receiver John Fisk, of PricewaterhouseCoopers, wrote to the company's 900 clients with almost $440 million invested, explaining that the firm was "urgently" working with the FMA to try to establish the state of Ross' assets.

This was "not a straightforward process", Fisk explained, with obstacles especially to determining foreign holdings.

"We have been informed that much of the business activity relating to overseas investments was undertaken outside of the group's offices by Mr Ross and no records exist for these transactions at the group's offices."

The statement is now the subject of concern among both Ross' clients and the investment community.

Bruce Tichbon, who has formed a group to represent clients said the statement was "unhelpful" because it did not explain whether the lack of record keeping was unusual.

"This could be a very bad sign or it could be normal practice, but it scared people."

One senior investment source said it was not unusual for shares purchased through a broker to be held by that company in a nominee account, with little paper trail held by the client. However, the source said, if the holdings were owned on behalf of a client it would be unusual not to keep a record on hand.

"You'd have a record of the dealings with the overseas broker, at least, and [a record of] the holdings."

Fisk did not respond to requests for comment.

Last week it was revealed that Ross' 900 client accounts showed balances suggesting the clients held a combined $439m, although the FMA's lawyer, Hugh Rennie, QC, said there may be a difference between this and the actual assets held by the company.

Ad Feedback

- BusinessDay.co.nz

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content