Ross assets may be sold for receiver costs

Last updated 12:12 26/11/2012

Related Links

IRD to cut Ross investors' losses? Ross held in hospital for three weeks SFO confirms Ross investigation

Relevant offers

National business

John Key says more spending to boost growth possible, but no need to panic yet Meat workers dispute heading to court 8000 washing machines unaccounted for after West Coast fire Hanover Finance directors settle with Financial Markets Authority for $18m Craft beer could be the next boom for New Zealand PGG Wrightson livestock division investigated by Commerce Commission New Zealand businesses should prepare for repercussions of a Greek debt default Major changes to EQC Act proposed Moody's upgrade Air New Zealand's credit rating Worker complaints tip of iceberg: union leader

Receivers for Ross Asset Management are indicating they will begin selling the suspected Ponzi scheme’s assets to cover costs, because its founder does not appear to have the means himself.

Representing PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) in the High Court in Wellington this morning, Bell Gully partner Jenny Stevens, presented a memorandum showing the costs of the receivership up until November 12 were $153,647.49.

To cover the costs, Stevens said receivers would have to sell some assets held by Ross Asset Management. An earlier order stated that the costs of the receivership should be covered by David Ross, its founder and sole director, however this would not be possible, Stevens said.

‘‘The position is that Mr Ross’ personal assets identified to date are insufficient to meet those costs. While that’s an ongoing matter for investigation, there’s certainly not sufficient liquid assets that are clearly attributable to him. There’s questions of joint property and the like, that’s why we are seeking the order we are.’’

Stevens said the costs were reasonable, as evidenced by the ‘‘extremely comprehensive’’ first receivers’ report dated November 12.

‘‘The amount of work that sits behind that [level of costs] should be evident on the face of the document.’’

Justice Stephen Kos said the right of receivers to sell property was already established and he did not need to grant permission. He said he saw nothing unreasonable in the table of costs associated with the receivership presented by Stevens.

Ross Asset Management, based on The Terrace in central Wellington, had its offices raided by the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) on October 31.

The regulator sprung into action after a number of investors complained that they had been unable to withdraw money. Within a week of the raid an asset protection order had been obtained by the High Court and the company was placed into receivership.

The first receivers’ report revealed that of the $450 million investors believed was being managed on their behalf, little over $10m had been established.Since then John Fisk of PwC said the total had increased to about $11m, but that a meeting with Ross meant there was little hope that substantially more would be found.

Ross was released from hospital last week, having been held under the Mental Health Act for three weeks.

Ad Feedback

He has stated publicly that he will cooperate with FMA and Serious Fraud Office investigations, but has declined to comment about the company.
PWC and the FMA have both said Ross had the ‘‘characteristics of a Ponzi scheme’’.


Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content