1080 plan draws condemnation

BY SHANE COWLISHAW
Last updated 05:00 20/11/2009

Relevant offers

A proposal to drop 1080 poison bait into the Waitutu Forest has drawn condemnation from several individuals and groups, including the fishing industry and deerstalkers association.

The Department of Conservation has lodged a resource consent application with Environment Southland to drop cereal bait over 25,000 hectares of forest.

Fifty-eight submissions have been received on the consent, with 50 opposed, four in support and four neutral.

Many submittors said the aerial use of 1080 was a blight on New Zealand's clean, green image.

Alternative pest control such as ground baiting with poisons such as Feratox was suggested.

But department murihiku area manager Dave Taylor said the pest control had been made possible by a $500,000 grant from the Government's National Heritage Fund, which stipulated an air-control operation.

A comparison with ground control had been done and revealed an extra $300,000 cost and a lower coverage area of 16,000ha, he said.

The effect on water quality was also raised in submissions.

CRA8 chief executive Malcolm Lawson said it was inevitable the poison would enter the marine area and could affect the export of rock lobster from the fishery.

PauaMac5 chairman Storm Stanley was also concerned, stating there was no body of scientific work available on the possible effects of 1080 on shellfish.

New Zealand Deerstalkers Association South Island vice-president Harvie Morrow said he was worried there would be no water testing by the department.

The association asked for assurances that all sampling and testing be carried out by an independent organisation.

But the department had support from two environmental groups – Forest and Bird Southland and the Southland Conservation Board.

Forest and Bird said the Waitutu Forest was deteriorating because of pests. Fewer possums would also mean better carbon sequestration in the forest, it says.

The conservation board agreed to give its support at a meeting last month, deciding an aerial drop was the most effective form of pest control in the area.

Environment Southland chairman Stuart Collie said a decision on the consent would be based on facts and science, not numbers.

"All submittors have an influence on the outcome but you have to be aware of the fact that numbers themselves don't mean anything," he said.The hearing will begin November 30.

Ad Feedback

- © Fairfax NZ News

4 comments
Post a comment
norman tipuna   #4   05:45 pm Jan 05 2010

i have to agree with the above. The sheer arrogance of these people amazes me. For goodness sake. Nature doesnt need a protector.And long after we are all gone. and that includes DOC . These wild places will still be here in one form or another.And yes DOC does want the bush all to themselves, that is obvious. Where is greenpeace, and the green party, and Ngai Tahu, The whales draw on peoples heart strings not some remote ancient bush in Fiordland ,Come on people and rise up to this act of eco terroism. Voice your oppinion to the Minister

Vito   #3   03:40 pm Nov 22 2009

Sorry to disagree BW, would you like to see my Bsc and Ma. Still trying to figger out how it could be a "disproportionate say". R u saying that only you should get a vote?

BW   #2   11:45 am Nov 22 2009

The reason it's not an elected position is because people with attitudes such as vito #1's would have a disproportionate say in who gets elected. The above rambling is a fairly good representation of the ill-informed, narrow-minded attitude of the majority of the anti-DOC contingent. Given the poor grasp of the English language displayed in the rant, there is probably very little chance any scientific studies have ever been read or even seen by this person. More than likely all "scientific" evidence against 1080 has been gathered down at the local!

vito   #1   05:30 pm Nov 20 2009

Doc are at it again, they want the forests to them selves. They don't want fisherman or deerstalkers in there bush, (heaven help us if a doc officer gets caught on a rusty fish hook or a shooter mistakes a pair of them for a Moose) the trouble is we pay there wages. Therefore shouldn't they listen to us? Maybe there a little deaf,(too much duck shooting without earmuffs). I think its time the conservitor of Forests and Parks position became an elected one, then we would see how long they persisted in polluting our forests with poison.

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Search for jobs in and around Southland and Central Otago

Careers in the South

Search for jobs in Southland and Central Otago

The Clubroom

The Clubroom

Your club information portal, post or view your sports fixtures, results and general information.

Community Noticeboard

Your Noticeboard

Check out what's on in your community or post an upcoming event.

Subscribe to a digital replica of The Southland Times.

Digital edition

Subscribe to a digital replica of The Southland Times.

Click here to read our free community newspapers from around the region.

Community newspapers

Click here to read our free community newspapers from around the region online.

Southland Times subscriber news and information.

Subscriber services

Southland Times subscriber news and information.

Click here for information about advertising with The Southland Times.

Advertise

Click here for information about advertising with The Southland Times.

Order our photos.

Order photos

Buy copies of photos featured in The Southland Times.