Expert responds over injuries

Last updated 05:00 21/02/2013

Relevant offers


Three men accused of aggravated robbery in court Accused killer the son of infamous murderer Drunken ski instructors charged 'Miracle' driver didn't hit traffic Jury sworn in for Oamaru murder trial Driver not at fault in tourist's death Fleeced investors unlikely to be compensated Judge: Mum puts booze before kids Man faces multiple fraud charges Spree of southern thefts admitted

A pathologist giving evidence at an Invercargill jury trial yesterday said it was not possible that a young boy's injuries resulted from an accident, given the evidence he had heard.

The trial of Aaron Kenneth Charles Howell, 24, continued in the Invercargill District Court yesterday before Judge Kevin Phillips. He faces a charge of causing grievous bodily harm with intent and an alternative charge of causing grievous bodily harm with reckless disregard for the boy's safety. The Crown alleges Howell assaulted the boy in his bedroom at Otahuti on May 29, 2009, causing his brain to bleed.

Defence lawyer Hugo Young said Howell told police he found the boy lying face down in the corner of the bedroom.

Mr Young asked pathologist Dr Martin Sage if it was reasonably possible the boy's injuries could have resulted from an accident.

Dr Sage said, given the circumstantial evidence given throughout the case, the answer was no.

Ad Feedback

- The Southland Times

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content