Queen with moko portrait draws complaints

BY JONATHON HOWE
Last updated 12:01 17/12/2009
Queen Elizabeth
ROYAL MOKO: The portrait by artist Barry Ross Smith of the Queen with a traditional Maori tattoo.

Relevant offers

National news

Crash blocks SH1 on the Kapiti Coast Dead woman's family says thanks Megaupload accused to spend another weekend in jail Drunk and abusive flyer sorry Teen jailed for sexual assault Warning: Man approaching children Hundreds newly red-zoned but many in limbo Boy killed by log 'adored by everyone' Man hospitalised after explosion Expert criticises Pike River safety refuge

A portrait of Queen Elizabeth II with a traditional Maori tattoo has raised the ire of Palmerston North residents who believe the image is insulting to both Maori and the Queen.

The print, at the Downtown Art & Framing store, features a young Queen Elizabeth with a moko on her chin and lips.

The date of the Treaty of Waitangi signing appears in Roman numerals next to the monarch.

Palmerston North Maori warden Nola Te Papa, of Tuhoe, said she was shocked when she first walked past the print on Tuesday.

"I shouted: 'what an insult to the Queen'. To sell that for $500 – no way. He needs to get that wiped.

"I love the Queen. People don't like her because of what's gone on in the past, but it's not her fault."

Resisting the urge to kick the print, Miss Te Papa walked into the store and gave the owner a piece of her mind.

"Those are only worn in Tuhoe by people in the chief's bloodline," she said.

"These artists are getting too carried away with the Maori moko, that's abusive. They are just printing it anywhere."

The print was a breach of tikanga (Maori custom), which could result in bad luck for family members of the Queen and the artist, Miss Te Papa said.

"It doesn't matter that it's a picture because the Queen is a real person."

Moxons Gemtime Jewellers employee Bev Blackwell said it was an insult to Maori culture and the Queen.

"I think it's disgusting and offensive. It should be destroyed and taken away."

Paeroa artist Barry Ross Smith, who created the artwork last year, said it was not intended as an attack on anyone.

"It was a way to show as a country that we have self determination from England.

"We actually built an entirely new race by signing the treaty, so the Queen of that new race would need a moko."

Mr Smith also did a self portrait in which he has a full facial moko – a statement about the merger of two equal cultures.

He said the portrait of the Queen was a celebration, and the response had been overwhelmingly positive.

Mr Smith had received negative emails about the print, but they were mostly from people with separatist beliefs.

Downtown Art & Framing store manager Cameron Autrobus said at least one copy of the print has been sold. "To be honest, the whole time we've had it we've only had two complaints. If you don't like it, then don't buy it."

Ad Feedback

- © Fairfax NZ News

121 comments
Post a comment
Mana   #121   05:49 pm Nov 01 2011

Im a maori myself and I think its beautiful, could he have gona about it a different way? yes! but he didnt and thats hes choice to make. I dont find it offence its very interesting a good conversation starter to say the least. AMAZING

Elijah Winter   #120   01:39 pm Apr 11 2011

I agree with Hawaiian #117. There is so much appropriation of Maori designs these days, and so many Pakeha artists who miss the mark on understanding what spiritual ideas lie behind Maori visual culture. But this is not confined to Aotearoa by any means. Ta moko is beautiful, but in this context I believe it is used wrongly. I can see where Barry Ross Smith is coming from, but he approached this in the wrong way.

Melissa   #119   12:27 am Jun 13 2010

Art is meant to be thought provoking, get over it.

J White   #118   07:07 pm Jan 23 2010

This is not good art, it is actually disrepectfull of our head of state, I'll bet you dont have or didn't even bother to obtain H.M permission for this. I suspect it is a publicity stunt to sell more of your work, some of which is very good--why do it?

Hawaiian   #117   01:05 pm Jan 12 2010

This picture is a disgrace, People don't know the meaning of Polynesian tattoo's, even in hawaii, people are getting kakau for any reason, even if they don't have a reason, People need to understand the meaning behind a kakau(tattoo) the significance of it, and when it is appropriate to use it or put it on your body, ths was a very important part of polynesian culture, and if you can't respect that, then something is really wrong with you as a human being if you can't respect someone else's culture.

Gentleman Caller   #116   04:30 pm Dec 18 2009

We are not a multi cultural society because the majority of Europeans in New Zealand have thrown their culture and their heritage away.

As Europeans we have a terrible tendency to discard anything which we consider to be outdated or lacking in value.

We have long since abandoned many traditions and other aspects of our culture, heritage and ancestory due to under-valueing them.

Leanne   #115   02:06 pm Dec 18 2009

It is actually a really beautiful painting and subsequently a lovely print. You can purchase a print of it in 3 different sizes and 3 different medias - canvas, frame mount or on Art paper - from the artists website. If nothing else it certainly creates interesting conversation.

Robert   #114   01:59 pm Dec 18 2009

What's the fuss about? I have a painting by Barry Ross Smith. In the background is the Queens coat of arms, in the foreground is the Queen straddling a coronation (look alike) chair. The picture shows the Queen as she looked a few years ago (about 70 odd), totally stark naked. I think he's even given her a brazilian, all tastefully done, of course.

What! you don't even like the idea of it!

Because she's naked and over 70? or because its the Queen?

Well get over it! Either art is acceptable and anything goes, or there is a dividing line between art and decency. Using property that belongs to someone else - the moko - and applying it to a rendering of somebody -the Queen- is not art, its outright theft. Theft of the image of the Queen, and the rights (who and how the moko can be applied) of another group (in this case Maori).

And no I don't actually have a picture by this thief calling himself an artist, I just needed you to get a picture in your own head - PC be damned - decency applies!!.

Jamie   #113   01:18 pm Dec 18 2009

Oh PLEASE wont someone think of the Tamariki!!!

Colin   #112   12:30 pm Dec 18 2009

Meh, it's an average painting of an over-rated head of a long discredited instition. The moko is it's only redeeming feature.


Show 62-111 of 121 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content