Copyright treaty not the cause of S92A delay

BY TOM PULLAR-STRECKER
Last updated 05:00 23/11/2009

Relevant offers

Technology

Chinese iPads seized in trademark dispute Guinness' all time greatest game ending Timberlake helps bring glory back to MySpace Laptop-shooting dad fights off fame How Rodney Brooks revolutionised robotics Yager's Cory Davis on Spec Ops: The Line Review: Resident Evil: Revelations for 3DS Review: Linksys Cisco E3200 dual band N router Air NZ example for high-tech public service - Key PS Vita: new kid on the block

The Government has denied that negotiations over a new international copyright treaty are delaying a decision over how hard it should come down on internet pirates.

The assurance will be a relief to internet advocates, whose pulses have once again been sent racing by leaked details of talks concerning a new international Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (Acta).

Commerce Minister Simon Power had expected to reveal details last month of a reworked section 92A of the Copyright Act that will set out what action can be taken against people who illegally download music and movies.

A controversial plan to force internet providers to take action against repeat copyright infringers "in reasonable circumstances" was scrapped in March after public protests. However, that appears to be the goal of United States policymakers, according to a leaked European Union briefing paper that preceded negotiations over Acta in South Korea earlier this month.

An Economic Development Ministry official says decisions on the new-look section 92A should be made in a month or so. "This is a complex issue and has taken a little more time than anticipated. Acta negotiations are a separate issue and have no impact on this work," the official says.

A spokeswoman for Mr Power says no new arguments or policy issues have emerged since a panel of experts issued a report in July. It recommended that arbitrators or the Copyright Tribunal would have the power to fine or disconnect pirates.

The Federation Against Copyright Theft, which represents the interests of the major United States movie studios in New Zealand, has criticised that approach as impractical, calling instead for "streamlined justice", as provided for in the original section 92A.

Members of the European Parliament and the European Council agreed restrictions on internet access could be imposed only "with due respect for the principle of the presumption of innocence" following a fair procedure where the "right to be heard" was guaranteed. – Dominion Post

Ad Feedback

- © Fairfax NZ News

0 comments
Post a comment

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Search for jobs in and around Southland and Central Otago

Careers in the South

Search for jobs in Southland and Central Otago