Copyright treaty not the cause of S92A delay
By TOM PULLAR-STRECKER - The Dominion Post
Relevant offers
The Government has denied that negotiations over a new international copyright treaty are delaying a decision over how hard it should come down on internet pirates.
The assurance will be a relief to internet advocates, whose pulses have once again been sent racing by leaked details of talks concerning a new international Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (Acta).
Commerce Minister Simon Power had expected to reveal details last month of a reworked section 92A of the Copyright Act that will set out what action can be taken against people who illegally download music and movies.
A controversial plan to force internet providers to take action against repeat copyright infringers "in reasonable circumstances" was scrapped in March after public protests. However, that appears to be the goal of United States policymakers, according to a leaked European Union briefing paper that preceded negotiations over Acta in South Korea earlier this month.
An Economic Development Ministry official says decisions on the new-look section 92A should be made in a month or so. "This is a complex issue and has taken a little more time than anticipated. Acta negotiations are a separate issue and have no impact on this work," the official says.
A spokeswoman for Mr Power says no new arguments or policy issues have emerged since a panel of experts issued a report in July. It recommended that arbitrators or the Copyright Tribunal would have the power to fine or disconnect pirates.
The Federation Against Copyright Theft, which represents the interests of the major United States movie studios in New Zealand, has criticised that approach as impractical, calling instead for "streamlined justice", as provided for in the original section 92A.
Members of the European Parliament and the European Council agreed restrictions on internet access could be imposed only "with due respect for the principle of the presumption of innocence" following a fair procedure where the "right to be heard" was guaranteed. – Dominion Post
Sponsored links
Woosh keeps package prices down
John Grisham gives nod to e-books
City charity shop uses Trade Me
Websites cry foul at Government deal
Word, Excel, PowerPoint: free online
William Shatner starts Facebook rival
'Do not call register' for NZ mooted
Rural areas to get fast broadband
Google opens online software shop
Apple iPad sparks war of the tablets
Ten funniest tweets during the Oscars
Let us sell at Easter: retailers
South's cow cockies cleaning up act
Effluent compliance up in south
Teenager survives spectacular crash
Davie's delicate digger deeds could win top prize
Minister to gather Milford flights info
Milford Sound cleans up it's rubbish act
Gore draft tips rate rise of 5.4pc
Maori wardens may patrol Queenstown from May
Collage in homage to Cassino battle
Rising talent Leitch confirms step-up
Teenager survives spectacular crash
Davie's delicate digger deeds could win top prize
Let us sell at Easter: retailers
Milford Sound cleans up it's rubbish act
Teenager survives spectacular crash
Worker clocks up 50 years at plant
Newest First
Oldest First