It's just not cricket

Black Caps win on back of controversy

Last updated 08:09 26/06/2008
Reuters
MAN-HANDLED: Grant Elliott is taken out by English bowler Ryan Sidebottom in the pursuit of a quick single.
Getty Images
UNEASY STANDOFF: English captain Paul Collingwood and New Zealand batsman Grant Elliott face off after Elliott was controversially run out.
Getty Images
JUBILATION: New Zealand batsmen Kyle Mills and Mark Gillespie celebrate the winning run in their side's thrilling one-wicket win over England.
Getty Images
CONTROVERSIAL MOMENT: New Zealand all-rounder Grant Elliott collides with English bowler Ryan Sidebottom before being run out.

Relevant offers

A handshake and apology between captains Daniel Vettori and Paul Collingwood has quelled a fiery aftermath to New Zealand's one-wicket cricket win over England.

The gentlemanly gesture came after Collingwood had the dressing room door slammed in his face.

A fuming New Zealand side initially refused Collingwood's offer of an explanation after he did not withdraw the appeal which saw a stricken Grant Elliott run out in the fourth one-day international at The Oval.

Elliott attempted a short single but collided with England bowler Ryan Sidebottom and was run out, despite being clearly injured and unable to make his ground.

Umpire Mark Benson sent Elliott on his way after checking with Collingwood to see whether he wanted to continue with the appeal.

Elliott was icing a badly bruised thigh but a team spokesman said he was not seriously hurt in the collision with Sidebottom.

Television pictures showed the disgusted reaction of the New Zealand players on the team balcony.

It was the angriest Vettori had appeared in his 11-year international career and he admitted he had never seen an incident like it.

"I was angry, and I think the whole group was. We couldn't understand it sitting up there. I'd like to think it's a decision I'd never have to make," he said.

"The guys were incensed at the time, Paul's spoken to us and apologised and acted contrite, so we'll move on from the situation and hopefully it doesn't happen again."

Vettori also issued his own apology for his side's behaviour after they refused to speak to Collingwood, and he immediately approached the England captain and coach Peter Moores to clear the air.

"Because we won the game we'll move on a lot quicker. Because he has apologised and admitted he's wrong it means we can move forward and head to Lord's (for the series finale) in the right spirit.

"We were incensed and it took us a little while to calm down. Clear minds prevailed in the end. It wasn't the way we want to act as a New Zealand team."

Ad Feedback

A visibly shaken Collingwood fronted the press conference admitting he was wrong but saying the decision was made in the heat of the moment, with the match going to the wire and the series tied 1-1.

He said Sidebottom had assured him the collision was accidental, but under the laws of cricket the captain can withdraw an appeal.

"When you're in the heat of battle you've got to make a decision like that," he said.

"I've never been in that situation before as captain. It's a difficult one to make and in hindsight I'll hold my hand up and probably say I made the wrong decision.

"It's something I'll have to live with. I apologised to the New Zealand lads and we've shaken hands on the pitch, hopefully there's no relationships dented, everything will be okay."

- NZPA

55 comments
ben   #55   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Chris #40

Ive lived in alot of different places in the world and from what was said to me is far from what you think. I dont think your trying to help at all, your just backing down from what you said because you know your wrong... Isnt this what happend to the austrailans when India were there earlier this year? If your going to say something atleast back it up with belief. And just so you know, everyone loves to beat the English, not just NZ. Head out of ass please.

Matt Jepson   #54   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Agree with Sione. Was pretty cold what the Poms did especially given the rained out one dayer where they should've bowled one more over to constitute a game (no surprises Collingwood is now being suspended for it for previous instances of slow over rates). That said you can probably draw parallels with the incident with the Sri Lankans. It was admirable what both Collingwood and Vettori said after the match. Although to be frank I can't fault Vettori for his (and the team's) reaction he was saying what all NZers were thinking!

I suppose it's best the players leave it in the past (although it does add some spice to the game in London).

In summary you probably saw the worst and best of cricket.

Tom   #53   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

# 17 posted 'Jimmy, I think you will find that is not correct. A fielder must give way to a running batter, unless he is fielding the ball. "Standing his ground ' is not an option or an legitimate reason for being in the way. '

I think you'll find you're in the wrong. Sidebottom is perfectly entitled to go for the ball - it is the batsman that has to get out of the way. Hence the laws on 'obstructing the field'

dk   #52   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Firstly, Ryan Sidebotom was not standing his ground, he ran into Elliot. Secondly, Elliot probably would have made it safely had Ryan not done this so England obviously had the wicket only because of the collision. And lastly, this cannot be compared to the Murali incident where McCallum took the bails off. No one from the NZ team interfered with Murali's foolish decision to walk out of his crease while the ball was still in play. Even the umpire, against protocol, was indicating to Murali that he should get back to his crease.

I dont believe in Karma, England made a mammoth error in not backing up their throw on the last ball and that lost them the game. New Zealand were lucky really, Styrus was dropped 3 times!

Rowan   #51   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

....this sort of thing made baseball famous. Keep it up, cricket is a better game for it, let's say a contact sport. If you don't like it, then enjoy your chardonnay.

Jim Loxten   #50   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Good to see some common sense on this message board. Kiwi's are fast aquiring a reputation outside NZ as whingers if they don't get their own way and this shows that actually there's a more grown up majority that realises that the world is not out to get you. The AB's 95% of the time play on the very edge of the law and frequently break it but hey that's sport and the endevour to win.

Collingwood did wrong, but no-one died and he apologised. Isn't there more in life than bloody sport - families, war, famine...!!

Mike   #49   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

FACT IS they stopped saying 'its just not cricket' a few years ago where winning was more important than walking, appealing for everything started and claiming dubious catches etc etc. Get over it for C sake we would have done exactly the same and as for refusing to shake hands???? We saying THAT is a appropriate...jeez, children!

Dave Boon   #48   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

To say we would have done the same is utter rubbish.

I would be disgusted if NZ didn't call the batsmen back, we have already been through an under arm incident that still brings raw emotion.

People mention the Murali thing and that was different, first of all McCullums back was to it all, and Murali just touched down and went off to the other end. No collision, no interferance... just someone not thinking about what HE was doing...

Collingwood will have to live with this, appology or not, he will not be thought of again in a sportsmen like manner. He is being rubbished in the press over here, and so he should be...

Jonathan   #47   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Put aside wether collingwood made the right decision or not look at pictures 1 and 5. He is pulling down the shoulder of elliot, why is no-one calling for suspension those photos pretty clearly show intent

bill lumberg   #46   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

decision was made, apologies exchanged, move on. Collingwood made a bad decision and maybe vetorri would of made the same mistake if he were in that position. hopefully everyone forgets about it, its not a big deal


Show 1-45 of 55 comments
Special offers
Opinion poll

Has Joseph Parker switched to the professional boxing ranks too early?

Yes. He's a rough diamond who could do with more polishing at amateur level.

No. He's got the ability and he's not suited to the amateur style of fighting.

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content