British press not impressed by All Blacks

Fairfax Media
Last updated 00:28 03/11/2008
Photosport
WISHFUL THINKING: The British press have taken a rather optimistic view of the All Blacks' hitout in Hong Kong en route to their Grand Slam visit.

Relevant offers

The British rugby press say New Zealand 's unconvincing Hong Kong Bledisloe Cup win shows the All Blacks are beatable on the forthcoming Grand Slam tour – but the claims lacked real conviction.

All of the major newspapers claimed both the Wallabies and the All Blacks could be defeated by a northern union over the next month.

However, they admitted it would still take a mammoth performance to defeat the southern hemisphere heavyweights.

Former Wales No 8 Eddie Butler, writing in The Observer, typified the northern out-take on the All Blacks' 19-14 victory at Hong Kong Stadium on Saturday night.

"There were signs of excellence; there were moments of frailty,"

Butler wrote.  "There were aspects to worry Europe and elements to give the old continent grounds for optimism.

"Both will be better for this ground-breaking game under their belts; both look some way off unbeatable."

Butler said Wallaby playmaker Matt Giteau was the best individual performer and, in what might be a preview of UK-based criticism to come, noted "at the breakdown, Richie McCaw delayed release and the rest of the forwards attacked the situation with their utterly characteristic aggression".

Long-time New Zealand rugby critic Stephen Jones followed suit.

"There was nothing on show at the Hong Kong stadium yesterday to terrify the European teams that these two Bledisloe Cup giants will meet in the next month, although there was enough to show that any victory will be hard-won," Jones told his Sunday Times readers.

"Yet it was typical of New Zealand that they should sort themselves in the dressing-room. There was far more purpose and far less speculation about them after the break."

Jones said the All Blacks' opponents will have noted the "lack of authority" in the scrum after Andrew Hore's injury-enforced departure and "the series of speculative passes which often cost them the ball".

"They will also note the fallibilities in defence of Sitiveni Sivivatu and Hosea Gear on the wing. They will note that Australians can still be attacked at scrum time, and that Australian self-belief is not what it once was."

Ex-England lock Paul Ackford, writing in the Sunday Telegraph, also concluded the All Blacks were rusty but was less emphatic than his colleagues about New Zealand and Australia being beaten over the next month.

Ad Feedback

"Vulnerable note, not beatable, because on this evidence it will require a performance of considerable courage and attention to detail to derail either side," he wrote.

Jones couldn't resist a pop at some of the talent in Graham Henry's squad which is missing at least 10 top players from last year.

"Henry's loyal hints that the players he still has at his disposal are better than those scattered round Europe are ridiculous. So you wouldn't pick Carl Hayman if you could, Graham?"

"As ever, the All Blacks will be about half as good as their followers think they are, though still hardly bad. The power and pride of their collective, the magnificence of their basic skills and ability to adapt to any circumstances cannot hide the fact that a large number of their individuals on this trip would not make a Guinness Premiership club roster.

"Take, say, Piri Weepu or Jimmy Cowan, the two All Black scrum-halves in Hong Kong yesterday? Hardly galacticos. We'll get back to you, lads."

Ackford noted the failed experiment with Daniel Carter at second five-eighth.

"With New Zealand  it's all about Carter. Get him and you get the lot.

"Coach Graham Henry shunted Carter to inside centre for the first 50 minutes and New Zealand were awful. It was not that Carter was rubbish, it's just that he has more control at outside half (first five)."

Do you agree with Stephen Jones' assertions? What do you make of his comment that a large number of All Black tourists wouldn't make an English premiership roster? Post your comments below.

97 comments
jo   #97   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Just checked No 23, if so insignificant and a waste of time, what does it say about hime taking the time to read all this and comment, if he doesnt like it take a hike .. Who is it that needs to get a life ..

Delia Smith   #96   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Who cares what Stephen Jones thinks? When are Fairfax going to get some decent sports journos that don't spend so much time naval gazing and worrying about what people in the Uk and Ireland think of us? Let the boys do the talking on the field. I know where I'm putting my money -and as usual - it sure won't be on the home nations.

Lewis Peterson   #95   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

I think everyone needs to calm down. All they said was that the All Blacks started poorly, they are not invincible, and that they could be beaten. Not that unreasonable really.

Maybe you should watch some Northern Hemispher rugby before you comment on it!

You do know that Ireland is not in the UK don't you?

Also some of you appear to think that all Northern Hemisphere National sides are full of New Zealanders! I don't think thats true, maybe you should check it before you comment.

Surely to be a grand slam tour you would have to beat France too! The "Grand Slam Tour" you all talk about is easier than winning the 6 nations, it shouldn't be too hard for you superior beings!!

Should it?

jim   #94   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

@63

Scotland have NEVER beaten the ABs. I guess they always just play their 2nd stringers the powerhouse they are.

Stephen Jones consistently rubbishes the ABs and apart from the odd WC game they consistently win. The record books do NOT favour Jones, in fact they make a complete mockery of him.

ABs record

Opponent Played Won Lost Drawn % Won France 46 34 11 1 73.9% Lions 34 26 6 2 76.5% England 31 24 6 1 77.4% Scotland 26 24 0 2 92.3% Wales 23 20 3 0 87% Ireland 21 20 0 1 95.2%

Says it all I think

Pat   #93   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

I am a Kiwi living in Europe and follow the English Premiership and the European competitions. Kiwi players of old such as Filo Tia Tia, who must be pushing 40, still shine in these competitions (he was recently man of the match in a Hieneken cup game) and players like Justin Marshall and Byron Kelleher are consistent standouts. This speaks volumes for the standard of rugby in the Northern Hemisphere and also explains their opposition to the ELVs which considerably speeds up the game, something their huge losse forwards in particular just can't cope with. To suggest that any of the current AB wouldn't make an English premiership team is palpably ridiculous - they all would on the standards I have observed over the past 3 seasons. I will be in Ireland on 15 November and Twickenham on the 29th to see Jones and co, once more, eat their words.

Duncan   #92   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

As usual, NZ supporters think that only they understand rugby and nobody else is allowed to comment on their team. To say that only Paul Ackford was a player of any note, does an injustice to Eddie Butler, late of Wales back row. In the Northern Hemisphere, we have nothing but admiration for NZ rugby, the fact that our own national sides are weaker at the moment, should not stop us from commenting on those of other unions. Triumphalism is not an attractive quality, especially when accompanied by Graham Henry`s smug face!

jamie   #91   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

commenting on the opinion that most of our squad would not make a premiership roster is rubbish. Our 1st 22 would all make it and those that would miss out would be Macintosh and the likes who have had solid Super 14's and stellar NPC season's which most outside NZ have not seen. I mean Ricky Flutey -a hurricanes first five who was replaced with Jimmy Goperth haha- is set to be the next English second five! The countless ex All Blacks and even fringe players, like Tito, who have had massive impacts even in near retirement in some cases shows their lack of depth and development.

CD   #90   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

I read Jones's comments on the weekend, and I've seen quite a few Premiership games living in the UK....Weepu and Cowan would easily laugh their way into the England squad let alone most Premiership teams if they could. Does Jones realise there's actually a guy who couldn't make the All Blacks been chosen for the England team after a few seasons here - Flutey. Jones probably feels Weepu and Cowan wouldn't make it because of their style of play, i.e. not in keeping with the boring tradition of English rugby. He went on and on about the ELVs and how most players are against them and how speeding up the game is not a good idea. He talks about the All Blacks being below par and very beatable, and for any Home Nation to have a successful Autumn they must beat the All Blacks, but then at the end of his article says that the All Blacks should win every game..

Lobbo   #89   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Let em whinge. Its what the poms are good at. Cant see that a good tight game like the one we saw from HK wasnt the try spree rugby but a real arm wrestle with two of the best teams in the world I dunno what they expect. Talk it up in your tabloids, NZ will meet you on the field, and the scoreboard will tell the story.

and in reply to #69, Maybe we should have sent Hawkes Bay! :)

Nick   #88   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Nothing against Filo Tiatia as he was a personal favourite when he was in his prime (about ten years ago), but I noticed that he was playing for the Ospreys a 1st division team at the age of 37. I doubt Filo Tiatia would be able to achieve this if he was still playing in New Zealand. For Jones to make the comments he did is outrageous and hypocriticial. Point taken the likes of Hayman, Mauger and Jack if were still in the country they would be in contention, if not in the All Blacks. But to say that Weepu or Cowan wouldn't make a playing roster is rediculous when a month or twi ago Jamie Nutbrown, probably ranked outside the country's top 5 halfbacks got a contract.


Show 38-87 of 97 comments
Special offers

Featured Promotions