Come in number 1917, your time is up

Last updated 11:21 27/03/2009

The game at McLean Park is the 1917th test match, going back to 1877 when 2,000 Melbourne residents turned up to watch the touring English side take on a 'combined' side including players from both NSW and Victoria at Richmond Park.

There have been a lot of incredible moments in-between - Bert Sutcliffe and Bob Blair batting in the fog of grief and emotion at Ellis Park (number 378), a test tied by a matter of a meter (498), a game which lasted ten days, and still ended in a draw (271), a game that was decided on just two innings (1483) and such extraordinary sporting moments that even a cipher of a ground and a year can recall memories of shots and wickets - Headingley 81, Kolkata 01, Carisbrook 80, Madras 86, Edgbaston 05, and older matches where no eyes who saw them remain to bear witness to them - The Oval 1882, Sydney 1895.

There have been controversies on the field that have rattled cricket - creating diplomatic incidents - names like Shakoor Rana, Darrell Hair, Douglas Jardine, Hansie Cronje, Muttiah Muralidharan, Geoff Griffin.

There have been heroic moments from Graeme Smith, Colin Cowdrey, Michael Atherton, Michael Whitney, Ewen Chatfield.

There have been performances of absurd athleticism, skill or stamina from Mark Greatbatch, Tom Richardson, Brian Lara, Harbhajan Singh, Waqar Younis, Willie Watson (no not that one...), Richard Hadlee, Jim Laker, Hugh Trumble and Mitchell Johnson.

There have been hideous injuries - to Ewen Chatfield, or Andy Lloyd, or Jason Gillespie. No-one who heard them will ever forget the bellows of Syd Lawrence as he writhed on the Basin pitch with a patella split in two.

Tragedy has breathed its livid breath over players like Archie Jackson, Gordon Greenidge, Ken Wadsworth, Colin Milburn, Johnny Briggs, Glenn McGrath and Jock Cameron. Politics has chilled the careers of Lala Amarnath, Heath Streak, Basil d'Oliveira, Charlie Parker and many South Africans of the 1970s and Pakistanis of recent times. There have been bombings, shootings, sabotage and fire.

There have been pitches infected by insects, or improperly prepared. There have been hoses mysteriously left on, and wickets deliberately glued, and vandalism in support of a prisoner.

Opera singers, priests, policemen, miners, cartoonists, florists, grave-diggers and princes have played test cricket. Nazi sympathizers, murderers, drug addicts and paedophiles have played test cricket. Sikhs, Hindus, Muslims, Christians and Buddhists have played test cricket - and that's just for India.

A Kenyan has played for New Zealand, an Egyptian for Zimbabwe, a Dane for England, and a Dalmatian for Australia. 

There is such an extraordinary freight of history that you might think there is nothing new that could possibly be original when umpires head out to place their stumps on the first morning of the 1917th test.

But no. McLean Park's latest entry into history may develop into one of the great games, or it might flop into deep dullness and boredom. That is for the next few days to witness.

But when the history of test cricket is recorded, McLean Park 09 - the second test to be played in Napier this summer, and only included in the tour schedule because of the terror attacks in Mumbai - may be remembered as the moment where two young blokes of Polynesian extraction played innings of great abandon, and less than 20 other pairs had made such a high partnership for the fourth wicket. Ever. In 1916 games.

It might also mark the game when Jesse Ryder began his ascent to becoming the world's number one batsman. Was his innings that good? Against an attack of Sharma, Patel, Khan and Singh - coming at 27 for 3? Supporting a skittish Taylor to a century of his own? Oh yes, it really was that good.

13 comments
Post a comment
Mr Crucket   #1   12:01 pm Mar 27 2009

<i>It might also mark the game when Jesse Ryder began his ascent to becoming the world's number one batsman.</i>

Wow, you aren't mincing.

I had similar thoughts however. Yesterday's innings could have been the first flushings of greatness of two players possibly destined to be two of New Zealand's greatest.

Alex   #2   02:43 pm Mar 27 2009

The big boy bats. He gets 100. He gets out. He bats again. He gets 200 and gets out.

I really like this pattern.

Dave   #3   04:14 pm Mar 27 2009

Just to put a twinge of reality here. Taylor's innings was lucky. Yes, he got 150, but McCullums innings was (or is, as its still going) better - even though he's only just reached the ton. Also, the Indians aren't bowling well generally, and as far as some calling them the best attack in world cricket - that's substantially overrating them.

That said, Jesse's innings was sublime. Just about chanceless, and showed maturity and temprament. It bodes very very well for the future. To say he's on the path to becoming the world's No.1 batsman might be a long bow to draw just at the moment though. Don't get me wrong, I hope he does, and he's got talent to burn, but these comments smack a little of those about a certain Matthew Sinclair after he got 214 on debut.

Deep Purple   #4   05:55 pm Mar 27 2009

I'm gonna follow the IPL with interest, if only to see how Ryder goes. Whichever team picked him up got a bargain, especially compared to Jacques Kallis (great test player, woeful one dayer).

Nick   #5   07:12 pm Mar 27 2009

I am getting really, really excited about our batting, and Kane Williamson isn't even in the side yet. All we need is a fast bowler who the Indian domestic corporate mini-game league lets us play.

Cooch   #6   10:15 pm Mar 27 2009

Hamish - As someone with a deep knowledge of test cricket history, surely you are aware that a couple of great innings does not a world no. 1 test batsman make... the adulation and the IPL are distractions that remain to be overcome!

Jacob   #7   10:21 pm Mar 27 2009

It was thrilling to go to cricinfo having last seen NZ three down for nothing hours before and see the headline "Taylor and Ryder drive New Zealand". You learn to take the small victories, and two young batsmen taking it to one of the best attacks around was magnificent. Only problem is a flat pitch for NZ is a flat pitch for India. Lets hope our bowlers can conjour something up. Dravid/Tendulkar/Laxman... gulp.

milkywayrocks   #8   03:37 am Mar 28 2009

I have to agree with Dave regarding Mathew Sinclair. Ryder is a wonderful talent, however, lets hope he stays away from the sauce. Taylor's innings was extremely streaky and against a team which fields properly he wouldn't be able to get away with it. He needs to learn from Ryder.

Nonetheless I'm glad to see the Blackcaps finally putting up a score. Well done lads.

Alex   #9   11:41 pm Mar 28 2009

Oh pooh-pooh you pooh-poohers. Matthew SInclair might almost qualify as being capable of cleaning Ryder's boots. The comparison was actually made by the guys in the commentary box, with the note that when Sinclair hits the ball as beautifully and cleanly, it goes straight to fielders.

This just in: a world unpredictable XI from Andy Zaltzman (the slightly less funny half of The Bugle). He resists naming a Dull X1 starring entirely NZ players http://blogs.cricinfo.com/andyzaltzman/archives/2009/03/the_unpredictable_xi_part_1.php

mark   #10   10:25 am Mar 29 2009

Well maybe someone can convince Bond and Tuffey to play for NZ again and throw Wagner into the mix and then NZ will start to trouble the major test teams again


Show 11-13 of 13 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content