Time for NZ World Cup bid

BY SAM BUCKLE
Last updated 10:42 01/02/2010

Football in New Zealand must aim high. It must be ambitious. And right now, we should be aiming to host a Fifa World Cup. No, this is not comic fantasy.

As we know, Australia has launched a bid to host the 2018 World Cup. Its bid was typically Australian: brash and undaunted. "We are Australians, of course we can host the World Cup. Let's just get on with it." You have to admire the audacity. However, despite creating quite a stir and making an obvious impression on Fifa with its preliminary bid, there are increasingly strong signals that the upstarts from Down Under will be not be permitted to turn global football order on its head. Last week, Fifa president Sepp Blatter suggested it was likely only European countries will be considered as candidates to host the 2018 World Cup finals. There was follow-up in the Sydney Morning Herald on Saturday.

This is New Zealand's opportunity.

I suspect Football Federation Australia (FFA) always felt 2018 was a helluva long shot. Europe is due that World Cup, with 2010 going to Africa and 2014 to South America - even if Asia is an increasingly powerful football bloc. The Australians' real target will be 2022 (as should be ours). But 2018 provided a rallying point and an opportunity for Australia to establish its credentials.

2022 is Asia's World Cup. It will be 20 years and five World Cups since Japan and South Korea co-hosted the only previous Asian World Cup. That's what the FFA really wants. Yet it is not the only member of the Asian Football Confederation keen on grabbing the big prize. South Korea, Indonesia and Qatar have all applied to host in 2022 - and there's plenty of time for others to enter the fray.

Personally, I have no doubt Australia would deliver a better World Cup than any Asian competitior. It has the infrastructure, the commercial knowhow as well as the ideal sports and tourism culture. Unfortunately (perhaps fortunately for us), Fifa will have other considerations, some political. For all its bridge-building with Asian football, Australia still remains an outsider in the Asian confederation. I have no idea exactly who owes whom what within Asian football or global football for that matter, but I doubt Australia can count on the support of Asia for its bid. After all, it's only been part of the confederation for four years, it's already grabbed one of the 4.5 precious World Cup qualifying berths and now it wants to take the only World Cup that Asia will see in the next 30 years.

Australia does, however, have a certain advantage over its Asian rivals. It is the only country that could involve Oceania (aka New Zealand) in a World Cup. Of course, Australia would prefer to host alone, but at a certain price it becomes worthwhile to trade a handful of World Cup matches for Oceania's political support and the opportunity to sell Fifa the concept of a World Cup that reaches right into football's sixth confederation and forgotten region. What's the price of extra insurance against the vagaries of Fifa politics or the powerful money of a Middle Eastern bid?

So, my starting point for negotiation is one group (six games), plus a second-round match and a quarterfinal. And we will even forgo automatic qualification as a host country. That's just how reasonable we can be!

Thanks to the Rugby World Cup, we already have two stadiums that meet Fifa's capacity requirements. Plus, the government would be obliged to front up with the cash to sufficiently augment Westpac Stadium given its willingness to hurl hundreds of millions at rugby and the America's Cup. And, yes I've heard Fifa don't like joint bids. Fortunately, Fifa does like to be flexible and take all considerations into account.

Of course, there will be massive obstacles, challenges, political and commercial realities etc etc etc. But the prize is enormous and the cost of being proactive and beginning to engage with the FFA is nothing. You cannot predict at this point how the 2022 bid process will unfold, who will bid, how the votes will fall, but it's possible that the stars could align favourably. What we do know is you don't get if you don't ask.

The moment Australia's bid for the 2018 bid is formally turned down is the moment the FFA will be reviewing its 2022 strategy. It is also the moment we (that's New Zealand Football and the Oceania Football Confederation) should be knocking on their door. I hope New Zealand Football can be as bold in setting its sights on less than an eighth of a World Cup as the FFA has been in going after the whole damn thing.

 

Follow me on Twitter Join the Facebook Page
Send me an Email
12 comments
Post a comment
ed   #1   12:35 pm Feb 01 2010

Agree with all of this.

However, how can Westpac stadium be "augmented"? The short sighted planners who made the stadium an oval - when there's usually only one or two cricket games a year at the stadium which actually require an oval compared to something like 25 rugby and football games - and a completely enclosed and shallow one at that, have probably majorly hamstrung efforts to augment the numbers sitting in the stands. I guess it could be done, by cutting out a bunch of the concrete sections along each sideline and replacing with taller stands that actually run flush with the sidelines, leaving the ends curved, but it'd be a big job....

Rhys   #2   12:59 pm Feb 01 2010

I think if we were to forgo the automatic host qualification then Oceania should get a full spot at that world cup, thus granting us the next best thing, a virtually guaranteed spot!

Canukiwi   #3   01:03 pm Feb 01 2010

I agree with most of your sentiments, Sam. Perhaps the biggest sign of whethere we have a chance will also come with who replaces Sepp. If, the position is taken up by a middle eastern/Asian, our chances are next to none. The power & influence of the role Sepp currently enjoys, cannot be underestimated, irrespective of how democratic we may think the voting process is.

However, having said that, they only way NZ'ers could ever get to see a world cup game is as you say, through hosting a pool game. I don't think hosting one of the 1/4 finals would be a stretch, either- but perhaps the biggest challenge may not come from FIFA, but FFA themselves. They may well be unprepared to share & I think that is a very real prospect. Oceania's voice, I'm afraid will count for little.

One thing that could work in our favour is if we run 2011, well. Infrastructure- grounds, hotels & transport have to hold up. We have to demonstrate the capacity to host larger events & IMO, a RWC would be dwarfed by the responsibility of hosting just one soccer WC pool, especially if the pool had an England, Italy or Brazil.

bergkamp   #4   03:26 pm Feb 01 2010

My understanding is that it is a requirement to have at least a 40000 seated stadium to host a Football World Cup...

How many of our stadiums are up to that?

Gregori   #5   04:41 pm Feb 01 2010

One in Auckland, one in Christchurch, and one in Dunedin (soon) will have at least 40 000.

To be honest, if Australia needed us to host a few games (which could well be the case, especially with the AFL not wanting to play ball) then that'd be great. But I reckon it would be great for NZ to have a go at trying to host it themselves in 2030.

We could (and should) be a part of Asia by then, but if we weren't (and that's a worst case scenario) we could use the whole "spread football around the world" card. The fact that Oceania has never hosted a World Cup could work in our favour.

louie   #6   05:14 pm Feb 01 2010

great article, i definitely agree games should be taken across the tasman. however Australia is bidding for both world cups at the same time. So New Zealand football should start the process now

Rhys   #7   05:29 pm Feb 01 2010

@bergkamp #4 He is not saying we will host the entire thing, just one pool, thus negating that regulation.

The Watcher   #8   06:00 pm Feb 01 2010

Sam, Frank Lowy was on SBS TV Australia discussing the World Cup bid.

ALSO, I think it's too far down the track (and too messy logistically and 'politically') to start messing with the World Cup bids.

JW   #9   01:53 pm Feb 02 2010

Hosting one group (with or without a couple of knockout games as well) would be a dream come true and the best NZ can ever hope for. There's no way we would forgo our automatic entry as hosts though - FIFA wouldn't allow that.

We should also be trying to join the Asian confederation as soon as possible. Oceania should be disbanded entirely.

Shaun   #10   03:53 pm Feb 02 2010

Good discussion- would love to have a group in NZ, and you are right, this is the best opportunity for NZ.

Gregori- the stadium in Dunedin wouldn't meet the requirements if it has to seat 40,000. According to the stadium website, the "Total capacity in maximum event mode is approximately 30,500"


Show 11-12 of 12 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content