The Aftermath & The Slogger's First XV for Lord's

Last updated 15:00 27/03/2008

New Zealand to win the one-dayers, England to win the Test series, who cares about the Twenty 20s. That was the prediction before the enthralling tour by the men fuelled on cold pies and warm beer. In reality that was the way it transpired too, but few would have predicted the labyrinthine twists and turns that the tour has thrown out.

The Mascarenhas fireworks display at Jeetan Patel's expense at Eden Park, the extraordinary tie in Napier punctuated with the emphatic arrival of Jamie How's talents on the international cricket scene, New Zealand gobsmacking everyone with their drubbing of the Poms in the Hamilton Test, Tim Southee's eye-catching boundary-laden debut, new kid Ocker on the block Tim Ambrose turning the knife in Wellington, and some magnificent adhesion from the previously struggling Andrew Strauss.

But in the end, it ended as it was meant to. Normal transmision resumed: the fragility of the New Zealand top and middle order was exposed ruthlessly by the lion-hearted lion-maned Ryan Sidebottom, and the English batting lineup restored their averages to 40-plus as our pace attack wilted with injury and inexperience.

So where to for the England tour?

OUT

No way: The selectors may feel they have seen enough of Craig Cumming, Michael Papps and Mathew Sinclair. Skippy let down all the Sincophiles by batting like a moron and scoring at a level comparable to extras, despite finally being given an extended run on flat tracks against non-Australian bowlers. Enough!

No, unfortunately: There may be some behind-the-scenes machinations to try and lure Scott Styris out of Test match retirement, but it won't work as he has committed to full involvement in the Indian Premier League. Given the relatively low price put on his carcass in the auction, he will surely be keen to play as match of that competition as he can to ensure he receives the full whack of his money. Even if he had not gone to the ICL, Shane Bond's fragile body would not have seen him play the Test matches against England. His focus would have been solely on limited overs cricket - he is still available for these forms of the game but has been "overlooked" based on BCCI pressure on NZC. Can Jesse Ryder be coaxed out of rehab? He will not be ready for a Test at Lord's in six  weeks. Ditto for James Franklin - although both may be a chance for the one-dayers in June. Can Andre Adams be coaxed back into international cricket? He is in the ICL so although available for Test cricket, he is also in the position of being "overlooked".

No, but nearly: Daniel Flynn, James Marshall, Grant Elliott

IN

Starting XI: Matthew Bell but only by a thread; Jamie How who is now a guaranteed selection for the next 5 years; Ross Taylor who must cement his class as our most reliable batsman; Peter Fulton because he is good enough and the cupboard is bare; Greg Hay to be the bolter and the new blood, rewarded for two years of meaty returns in first-class cricket; Jacob Oram assuming his creaking body holds together in India; Brendon McCullumDaniel Vettori; Kyle Mills who would be more handy if he could learn to bowl left-armed but makes the side nevertheless; Tim Southee who has now leap-frogged Gillespie and O'Brien; and Chris Martin, consistently our best bowler.

Bench: Jeetan Patel who will practise his well-honed Raro-making technique on tour and will play if Mills/Martin/Southee implode; Iain O'Brien who is highly rated by the selectors, if by few others; Gareth Hopkins who offers cover as a keeper and a gritty middle order batsman; and Mark Gillespie,  the most vulnerable so I'm sitting on the fence with him - he could lose his slot to a batsman such as Marshall J or Flynn, and if Oram is more crocked than has been revealed, Elliott will retain his spot (but must bat below Vettori).

45 comments
Post a comment
Andy   #1   03:30 pm Mar 27 2008

I'm a bit surprised to see Matt Bell in your lineup - if he does get there it will be by the skin of his teeth. And why would you pick Fulton again when he is clearly in dreadful form? I would much rather see Flynn and MacIntosh go.

Crash   #2   04:41 pm Mar 27 2008

I really look forward to seeing Greg Hay get into the Black Caps action, sooner rather than later. I think he's a genuine talent. Let him at it, selectors.

The Holden   #3   04:44 pm Mar 27 2008

Andy: Just to clarify, this is who I reckon they will select as opposed to who I'd pick. That said, a lineup with Flynn in for Fulton and McIntosh in for Bell would be too green with three batsmen on debut on May 15.

Paul   #4   04:51 pm Mar 27 2008

I don't know why everyone doesn't rate Gillespie - he's taken wickets in both his tests and he has genuine pace - much more than Southee, O'Brien and Mills.

I don't see Mills as a long term test bowler unless it's a green seamer and only then as fourth paceman - for the next few years I'd rather have Martin, Southee, Gillespie and Oram as our paceman.

The Holden   #5   05:00 pm Mar 27 2008

Paul: Unfair on Mills - his Test bowling average is second only to Jacob Oram over the past 2 years (24 wkts @ 22). He can also tie down an end and bowl to a plan, something Gillespie seems less capable of doing. Gillespie is conceding over 4 runs an over and is now competing with Southee for a spot - I know who I would prefer.

chris   #6   05:03 pm Mar 27 2008

Pointless taking Bell. He's had his chances here and his lack of technique (which seems to have deserted him) will be exposed on greener pre-summer tracks in England. Being shown what was possible at Napier by a rookee was surely the end. Sinclair likewise. Someone with a history of managing seam bowling essential. But who? Ryder may be worth the punt as and when.......And who at no 3? Is going back to Fulton a return to the same old, same old? Taylor is finding his feet at no 4 and should be left there......Hats off to Southee though....had he come in after McCullum and before Vettori would the outcome have been different? Ah, hindsight.

mayhew   #7   05:16 pm Mar 27 2008

Can't help but find it gut-twistingly disturbing to see James Marshall's name popping up so frequently. The man has looked out of his depth at international level when he has been given the opportunity, and I don't believe he deserves another crack. Braces will probably take him nonetheless, he persisted with Marshall H for long enough. Fulton has shown at one day level he has what it takes against quality bowling, and Hay deserves to be rewarded for his returns at domestic level, for good or ill. We will have a much tougher middle order once Ryder's hand comes right, providing he can keep a pint out of it, bless him. If Elliot wears the silver fern again I am going to start watching softball

Chris   #8   09:01 pm Mar 27 2008

It is hard to see them leave out Bell after he 'grafted' his to a half century. He has had a dreadful run but there are not any other real opening options. MacIntosh has been all over the place in his career. For a time there people believed he could be another Richardson (I remember Richardson himself mentioning McI when he departed the scene). I believe he will suffer from the same self doubt that appears to effect Sinclair, Papps and to a lesser extent Bell. I would pick Bell again but make sure there is other options in the squad. Fulton has to be there. The many has played outstandingly well for NZ at ODI level. They should be working him hard to get him right and play him if he comes through the warm-up games OK. Other wise Hay deserves his chance.

I agree on Gillespie - he is too expensive. There is no point picking the guy just because he is fast. One concern is we are starting to develop a strong group of all rounders and given the poor top order there maybe a tendency to put another all rounder in the side longer term. My picks

Bell, How, Fulton, Taylor, Ryder, Oram, McCullum, Vettori, Southee, Mills and Martin.

Hay, Marshall or Hopkins, Patel, Gillespie and Obrien

I think they will take 16 or perhaps have one of these back-up playing domestic cricket over there.

The Holden   #9   09:05 pm Mar 27 2008

mayhew: Agree - Fulton is a good player out of touch, but he will come right. A FC average of 47 across 100 bats is useful, but man he needs some runs in the bank in the remainder of what I like to call the Plunket Shield. Hay is worth a crack for sure.

Elliot   #10   09:08 pm Mar 27 2008

This is obviously a rebuilding phase for NZ cricket so why not chuck a few young guns in the deep end and see if any of them pay off. Fulton has had his chances, likewise bell and sinclair. Bring in some fresh blood, give the young guys a crack.


Show 11-45 of 45 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content