CMJ's Top 100 (mainly English) cricketers

Last updated 09:48 19/05/2009

Christopher Martin-Jenkins relinquished the chief cricket correspondent's throne at The Times to Mike Atherton a year ago, and he has been a busy little anorak in the interim. In December, he was made an MBE in the Queen's New Year's honours list, telling Patrick Kidd: 

"It has been a great privilege to go round the world writing about cricket. The older one gets, the requirement for England to win becomes less important than the needs of the game as a whole... One concern for me is the contraction of cricket coverage towards the England team alone. We should not forget the county game and the grass roots, without which you couldn't have an England team. Nor should we overlook the fascination of the world game generally."

This month, his book - The Top 100 Cricketers of All Time - was published and the PR in its wake proclaims it as follows:

"Placing them in order of precedence, he has analysed each of them, assessing their characters, the cricketing elements that made them so outstanding and the special qualities that enabled them to be pre-eminent in their time." 

Not quite sure how this particular publication sits in relation to that plea to look after the county game: not only does it focus on past and present members of the England team (rather than first-class players), it is also heavily biased toward Old Blighty's great cricketers rather than those from elsewhere around the world.

Given Martin-Jenkins's pedigree of (a) writing eloquently for The Times and (b) muttering away magnificently on Test Match Special for a staggering 35 years (famously relaying the news that Daniel Vettori had kept "his rod down" at Lord's last year), there should be no surprise that blind patriotism and Anglophilia shines through.

CMJ's podium finishers are predictable - Bradman at number one, and English legend W G Grace in the silver medal position, ahead of Sir Garfield Sobers. The bearded Englishman is one slot too high for mine - he should be behind, rather than ahead of the great West Indian knight.

Overall, there are 34 English players in his top 100, 24 Australians, 15 West Indians, while India claims eight, Pakistan and South Africa six apiece, Sri Lanka a quartet, and Andy Flower flies the Zimbabwean flag solo. One slightly dyslexic Australian put it succinctly in a comment left on The Times website: "With all the English players making the top 100, you would think that they should of won more games." Great call Waz from Mission Beach, Queensland.

Among his century of cricketers, the man known as CMJ holds a place in his cricketing heart for New Zealand - but it is a very, very small place. Just two Kiwis make the list: Sir Richard Hadlee at #25, and Martin Donnelly at #73, wedged there in between Super Cat at #72 and The Wall at #74. Martin Crowe, Glenn Turner, John R Reid, Shane Bond, Daniel Vettori and Bert Sutcliffe would probably make some decent arguments in their favour if they headed to the Old Bailey to argue for inclusion.

Following on from CMJ's slightly dodgy angling theme above, Squib Donnelly (who was also a very keen fisherman) is an intriguing selection, but only for the fact he is hugely underrated in his home country. Given he was going around in the 1930s and 1940s, and his career was very brief at international level, it is perhaps no surprise that his cricketing abilities are not celebrated as often and as loudly as they should be. Described by some as the greatest left-hand batsman and point fielder ever seen, Donnelly's most discussed achievement was probably compiling New Zealand's inaugural Test double ton (206 at Lord's) to force a draw at the spiritual home of cricket, a watershed moment for our nation's cricketing credibility.

18 comments
Post a comment
paulimus_prime   #1   11:21 am May 19 2009

I think Geoff Armstrong's The 100 Greatest Cricketers is a much better book, he selects people into teams(plus a 100th man) this way you get an even amount of batsmen, allrounders, bowlers & the usually forgotten wicketkeepers.

But honestly you wouldn't think Vettori would be anywhere near that list do you? His record in tests over the past few years isn't anywhere as good as it should be.

Dave   #2   11:26 am May 19 2009

Donnelly isn't so surprising given the Enlgish bent on the book... He played most of his cricket at first class level in England, and became quite renowned over there at the time. Including Donnelly at 75 and not even mentioning Sutcliffe (Donnelly's contemporary and rated his equal or better by those that saw them play on that tour in the 30's) is quite surprising though. Crowe and Turner, were both rated the number one batsman in test cricket for a period of time and Turner is one of the very few guys with 100 100s. Personally, I've have had Reid in there as well. That would give NZ five, which is about right. Bond is awesome, but he just wasn't around long enough in tests, or in ODIs for that matter. Vettori is a good left arm spinner, but he's not an all time great of the game.

Stef   #3   01:41 pm May 19 2009

Lots of Poms I've never heard of on that list, but if Ian Healy, Shaun Pollock, Freddie Flintoff and Graeme Smith have made the cut, then Turner and MD Crowe should definitely be in there. And Murali at no. 13? Controversial.

Jack   #4   03:12 pm May 20 2009

Blair Hartland should be on that list...

Marco   #5   07:38 pm May 20 2009

Blair's namesake Pocock could equally be there too.

KP   #6   11:33 pm May 20 2009

What about Chris Cairns? A better Test player then flintoff (who is rated 82nd)!!!

guy   #7   09:42 am May 21 2009

what about murphy sua?

Ben A   #8   11:14 am May 21 2009

Yeah, for all that I love our noble captain (and I do, in an entirely appropriate manly way), he can't claim to be an all-time great. He'd STROLL into the All-Time NZ XI, though. Bond is another one in the same boat (and I see Cricinfo is reporting that the ICL has released him and he's keen to play "official" cricket...EXCELLENT.)

@ Paulimus: I think his problem in tests is 1) not being a huge turner of the ball but more importantly 2) having been assessed as by far NZ's best bowler by the opposition. Everyone we play in tests is largely content to just see off Vettori at one end and feast on whoever is bowling at the other - and why not? In one day or 20/20 cricket though, teams can't afford to just write-off a quiet 10 or 4 over spell and end up trying to attack him more, and consequently he gets a lot more wickets.

ivor bigun   #9   01:14 pm May 21 2009

Surely 'Mr Extras' Robert Kennedy must have been close?

big dog   #10   04:48 pm May 21 2009

To be honest I think these "all time lists" are flawed. Players should be ranked as per decade, can we really compare for say Bradman with Ponting? We never saw Bradman play a 20/20 or an ODI, the era's are different. How effective would Richard Hadlee be in a 20/20?

Dont get me started on rugby and Pinetree in these lists...


Show 11-18 of 18 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content