Next on the list: 20 players to contract

Last updated 13:05 26/05/2009

The Press reported that Friday 26 June is D-day for the 20 contracted players who will be contracted to New Zealand Cricket for the 2009/10 season. This could well be in the aftermath of the ICC World T20 raffle, unless of course we lose to the Kiltwearers (6 June, The Oval) and the Proteas (9 June, Lord's).

The contract period has been moved from the end of May to the end of July, with contracts for 2009/10 starting on August 1. Contracts are awarded to the 20 players who have "the greatest likely future value to the Black Caps in the next 12 months". Whatever that means.

Of course, for seven players the contract list is more a matter of pride than a matter of pennies with McCullum, Vettori, Oram, Ryder, Taylor and Mills and Styris all paying the bills and then some with their IPL contracts.

As the international cricketing scene fragments, some speculate players may opt not to sign with New Zealand Cricket, and essentially become free agents contracted on a tournament-by-tournament or series-by-series basis. Could a B McCullum or a Styris take that bold move? No way - well, not yet anyway.

With the Indian Cricket League option imploding, and the ongoing requirement for NZC to issue a silly "non-objection certificate" to players who wish to partake in the IPL money-go-round, it seems far-fetched.

So where do we sit when we look at the merits of this year's list? I suspect lip service will be paid to the importance of Test cricket - extra weighting and all - but the reality is that ODI and T20 cricket is thundering up the priority list. It seems increasingly ridiculous that T20 value does not warrant its own separate component in terms of calculating the rankings. Surely the day for this to happen is fast approaching. 

I think we can slap the contenders into three camps: Old Schoolers from the class of 2008/09, New Entrants and Other Chaps. My list comprises 13 old schoolers and seven new entrants.

Old Schoolers: Daniel Flynn, James Franklin, Chris Martin, Brendon McCullum, Kyle Mills, Iain O'Brien, Jacob Oram, Jeetan Patel, Jesse Ryder, Tim Southee, Ross Taylor, Daniel Vettori and Scott Styris.
 
New Entrants: Neil Broom, Ian Butler, Brendon Diamanti, Grant Elliott, Martin Guptill, Nathan McCullum and Peter McGlashan.

Here are the Other Chaps to consider as you critique my list's flaws and foibles:

Shane Bond, Craig Cumming, Peter Fulton, Mark Gillespie, Gareth Hopkins, Peter Ingram, Jamie How, James Marshall, Warren McSkimming, Michael Mason, Aaron Redmond, Shanan Stewart and Ewen Thompson.

The speculation around Shane Bond's imminent return is welling up again, but I think it would be unlikely that the establishment would embrace him back with open arms at first blush. And on the other side of the picket fence, given Bond's experience trying to tiptoe through global cricket's political minefield last time around, he'll probably just play for match payments anyway. Otherwise he'd be my third man picked after Vettori and McCullum.

For the record, here's the 2008/09 list: Daniel Flynn, James Franklin, Peter Fulton, Mark Gillespie, Gareth Hopkins, Jamie How, James Marshall, Chris Martin, Michael Mason, Brendon McCullum, Kyle Mills, Iain O'Brien, Jacob Oram, Jeetan Patel, Aaron Redmond, Jesse Ryder, Tim Southee, Scott Styris, Ross Taylor and Daniel Vettori.

-> Listen to the Beige Brigade podcast here: Ep 89 is the "Shoaib Akhtar's Jungle Splash Episode".

-> Follow the Beige Brigade on TWITTER here.

-> KIT UP in Beige Brigade clobber here.

22 comments
Post a comment
Scott   #1   02:04 pm May 26 2009

cant really argue with your list, sat here trying to find things to pick at but cant :(.

Maybe Ian butler? i dont know if he really deserves a contract. but yeah he is the only one.

Todd   #2   02:57 pm May 26 2009

The problem is we are short on top quality cricketers. Do you have Franklin in as a batsman? Surely not as a bowler. Styris has had his day. Fulton is always played out of position. What's happened to Tim McIntosh? Redmond as purely a spinner - the anti-Richardson??

paulimus_prime   #3   03:27 pm May 26 2009

McCullum as your second player picked really??? Shouldn't it be Taylor - surely Taylor and Ryder are the 2 cornerstones of our batting for the next 7-8 years sure McCullum comes next but not before those two.

Is Bond is able to play internationals again I don't NZ cricket would give him a contract straight away - I think they will do match payments until next year when if everything hunky dory between Bond & NZC then he will get a contract as a matter of pride for him.

The Holden   #4   04:02 pm May 26 2009

Todd: Yes, you're bloody well right. McIntosh should be there somewhere - I overlooked him recklessly in my obsession with T20 and ODIs.

PP: McCullum is the vice-captain so that was my rationale there.

Suhas   #5   04:23 pm May 26 2009

It's a damning indictment of the state of NZ cricket that not a single 'specialist' opener makes your list - I consider Guptill a natural no.3 who has been shunted to the opener's slot by default.

No Tim McIntosh, hmm. So the verdict is out on him it seems. If there's a chance that Shane Bond makes it back, what about Daryl Tuffey and Lou Vincent?

The Holden   #6   05:46 pm May 26 2009

Suhas: I have confessed to a Timmy Mac oversight so bring him into the mix. Tuffey is an interesting one. You're dead right in that he should be in contention but who would he be contracted ahead of on "potential": Martin, O'Blogger, Jimmy F, Mills or Southee? Vincent well and truly burnt his bridges when he left the NZ scene - does he want to play for New Zealand? I suspect not. He is set to play for Derbyshire in June: http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/cricket/s/1113640_local_cricket_roundup

Reg Corres   #7   01:40 am May 27 2009

I would like to see NZC refuse to offer non objection certificates to the players in the IPL unless they agree to be non-contracted for New Zealand. I cannot see the likes of Vettori or McCullum refusing to play ODIs or Test Cricket for NZ and they would still get match payments.

Lets face it IPL players earn more coin in the IPL and non-contracting them would also allow more of the second stringers to get a contract and focus on improving their game in the next twelve months.

Of course the risk is they take off and play 20/20 all year, but I think they are likely to do this anyway if they really want to.

Just a thought.

Ben A.   #8   01:21 pm May 27 2009

I'm with Todd, Styris has done nothing for us lately and unless he shows better in the World 20/20 than his typical innings of 14 off 8, 11 off 4 etc., we should have done with him. Ryder can bowl his overs.

Todd   #9   04:17 pm May 27 2009

Careful with your T20 and ODI obsession Holden - you'll end up like Gayle. And I don't mean cool...

John Patrick   #10   06:39 pm May 27 2009

McIntosh does not have the technique to play tests, Mr Holden. Having been ruthlessly exposed by a top test side in India. I'd hate to think what South Africa, England, Australia would do to him, especially with the short one. The search goes on for another opener then.


Show 11-22 of 22 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content